Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 2 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 3 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 3 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 5 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% |
| 6 | LIN Audrey J. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
| 7 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 8 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 9 | JUNG Irene | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 10 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | - | 3% | 30% | 66% |
| 11 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 23% |
| 12 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 31% |
| 13 | HE Charlotte | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 14 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 15 | YAO Rainie | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | JOHNSON Lydia | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
| 18 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 17% |
| 20 | LEE Hannah | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% |
| 21 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 22 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 30% | |
| 23 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 24 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% |
| 25 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
| 26 | LU Amy | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 27 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 28 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 53% | 14% |
| 29 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% |
| 30 | SADOVA Olga | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 31 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 32 | BOIS Adele | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 36% |
| 33 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 34% | 59% |
| 33 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 35 | LIU Sophie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 36 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 37 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 38 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 39 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 40 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 41 | SHI Cathleen | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 42 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 46% | 11% | |
| 43 | LU Elaine | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 44 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 45 | SO Catelyn | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 46 | MUND Ruth | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | JEONG Katie | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
| 49 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 3% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 8% |
| 50 | CHANG Audrey | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | HUANG MADELINE | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 52 | DHAR Aamina | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 53 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
| 54 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% |
| 55 | LIAO Siwen | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 56 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 58 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 59 | CHAVAN Arya | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | TSUI Natalie | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 61 | WEBER Juliana I. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 62 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 63 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 64 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 65 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 65 | JOHNSON Lauren | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 67 | XIONG Haojiao | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 68 | MARYASH Samantha | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% |
| 70 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | - | 6% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 5% |
| 71 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 72 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 73 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 74 | YUAN Greta | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
| 75 | CHIN Elise | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 76 | TONG Jessie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 77 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 78 | LEE Sophia | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 79 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 80 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 81 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 82 | LACSON Sarah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 14% |
| 83 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 84 | DENG Brooke | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 85 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 86 | HOLMES Emma | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 87 | LEE Lauren | 1% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 88 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 89 | FAVO Isabella | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 89 | SCHICK Veronica | 3% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 91 | HUAI Delilah | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 26% | 3% | |
| 92 | TREACY Aisling | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | HU Michelle | - | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | LIU Yifei | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 95 | ZHAO Emily W. | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 96 | WEI JoyAnn | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 97 | XI Shining | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 8% |
| 98 | FESTA Carina | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 99 | NAYAK Esha | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 100 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 101 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 102 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 103 | CANSECO Carly | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 104 | LOO Kaitlyn | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 105 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 106 | SPEARS Mya B | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 107 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 108 | LIU Sydney | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 109 | YANG Lea | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 110 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 111 | KER Grace | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 112 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 113 | LIN Nicole | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 114 | YOUNG Audrey | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 115 | HITOMI Nadya | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 115 | DAI Olivia | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 117 | XU Emily T. | 3% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 118 | FEIG Sela | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 119 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 5% |
| 120 | XIE Nora | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 121 | SCOTT Eve | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 122 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 123 | JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 124 | ZOLLER Noelle | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 125 | FAN Grace | 1% | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 126 | CHEN Kevy | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 127 | BROCK Sydney | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 128 | KANDADAI Lara | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 129 | DILLE Carolina G. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 130 | CHO Michelle | 5% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 131 | NAYAK Indra | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 132 | CHIANG Melissa | 1% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 133 | MARGULIAN Maria | 9% | 41% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 134 | FANG Sophie | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 135 | FENG Alicia G. | 6% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 136 | ATTIA Jasmine | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 137 | HENRY Soraya S. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 137 | FREY Sarah E. | 11% | 50% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 137 | BAWA Anahat | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 140 | NEUMAN Ella | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 141 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 142 | TAN Adelyn | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 143 | TODD Phoebe | 1% | 18% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 144 | CHIANG Emily | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 145 | BROWNER June | 18% | 52% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 146 | TUNG Renee | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 147 | COLBY Mercer | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 148 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 149 | REGANTI Sitara | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 150 | HOLMES Sabrina | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 151 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 152 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 153 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 154 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 155 | BRAMMER-GONZALES Xiomara | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 156 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 157 | NEELEY Leilani | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 157 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 3% | 32% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 159 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 160 | TESTROET Aubrey | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 161 | DONDERIS Katherine | 2% | 38% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 161 | GOLDIN Nina | 2% | 15% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 163 | STONE Coral | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 164 | PYO Penelope E. | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 165 | DUDNICK Morgan | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 166 | MANN Sophia J. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 167 | LIM Jaslene | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 168 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 169 | DANTULURI Shalini | 3% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 170 | LIM Jovine | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 170 | WILSON Eva | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 172 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 173 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 174 | FLATT Sophia | 1% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 175 | SAWANT Asmi | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 176 | GONTARSKI Rachel | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 177 | RODGERS Rachel | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 178 | ZHOU Ziling | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 179 | KIM Nicole | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 180 | IYER Arushi | 23% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 181 | ERBSEN Sarah | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 182 | ARNOLD Hali | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 183 | CHAN Kayla | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 184 | GRULICH Rayaana | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 185 | NAYAK Anika | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 186 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 12% | 49% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 186 | YAM Danika | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 188 | CHOW Caitlyn | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 189 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 189 | KHAN Alissa | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 191 | LIN Lauren | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 192 | KIM Caitlin | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 193 | KHOST Maeve | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 194 | SYED Azra | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 195 | FAYETTE Mathilde | 71% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 195 | LAGOON Miriam | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 197 | BRUNGARDT Gabriela | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 197 | OWCZARZAK Mae | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.