The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

November NAC

Junior Women's Épée

Friday, November 8, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KOMAR Sofia - - - 2% 15% 42% 41%
2 BEDDINGFIELD Claire E. - - - 2% 12% 39% 46%
3 KETKAR Ketki - - - 2% 15% 41% 42%
3 PARK Faith K. - - - - 5% 29% 66%
5 KHROL Jaclyn - - 1% 5% 21% 41% 32%
6 DIB Vanessa - 1% 7% 26% 39% 24% 4%
7 GRADY Miriam A. - - - 3% 17% 42% 37%
8 ZAFFT Tatiana M. - - 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
9 BEITTEL Chloe F. - - 4% 15% 32% 34% 15%
10 ZOZULYA Christina S. - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
11 LIN Jessica Y. - - - - 4% 26% 70%
12 YAMANAKA Mina - - 1% 6% 26% 44% 23%
13 BULAVKO Sonia - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
14 MANGANO Ariana J. - - - 3% 17% 41% 39%
15 YEU Irene - - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
16 HU Grace - 1% 8% 26% 37% 24% 5%
17 VERMEULE Emily - - - - 3% 26% 71%
18 HUSISIAN Hadley N. - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
19 LIANG Jessica - - - 3% 15% 40% 42%
19 CALDERARO Margherita - - - 6% 30% 57% 7%
21 JOYCE Michaela - - - - 5% 31% 63%
22 OXENREIDER Tierna A. - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
23 DING Jiahe (Heidi) - - - 4% 20% 42% 33%
24 BUCUR Rebekah O. - 2% 11% 30% 36% 19% 3%
25 O'DONNELL Amanda A. - - 1% 6% 25% 44% 25%
26 WANG Elizabeth - 1% 5% 21% 38% 28% 7%
27 ENO Megan E. - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
28 BOUDREAU Justine - 4% 17% 31% 30% 14% 3%
29 PROCTOR Sara J. - 3% 13% 32% 37% 15%
30 TYLER Syd - 1% 4% 16% 33% 33% 13%
31 ZHENG Ava - 1% 5% 20% 38% 30% 7%
32 CHOI Lyla 1% 6% 20% 32% 27% 11% 2%
33 NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
33 DANIEL Chloe L. - - - 3% 15% 42% 40%
33 MUCSI Angela Lilla - 1% 9% 26% 37% 23% 4%
36 PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. - - - 4% 17% 41% 38%
37 RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. - - - 5% 22% 43% 30%
38 KHAMIS Yasmine A. - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
39 LEUNG Natalie - - 4% 16% 34% 33% 12%
40 WU Amelia - - 3% 15% 36% 35% 11%
41 ZUHARS Renee A. - - 3% 15% 34% 36% 11%
42 LEE Sumin - - 4% 16% 34% 33% 12%
43 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. - - 3% 19% 40% 31% 7%
44 LIN Waiyuk 1% 10% 26% 34% 21% 7% 1%
45 MILEWSKI Nicole 1% 10% 32% 36% 18% 3% -
46 RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. - - 5% 20% 36% 30% 9%
47 KULKARNI Diya - 1% 7% 24% 40% 26% 3%
48 MYLER AnneMarie - 1% 9% 26% 37% 22% 4%
49 LEE Michelle J. - 1% 6% 22% 38% 27% 6%
50 MILLER Veronica 1% 10% 33% 38% 16% 2% -
51 LEUNG Karina Kay Sze - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
52 SMITH Grace L. 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 5% -
53 NING Emma - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
54 MALDONADO Pilar I. - - 4% 15% 33% 35% 14%
54 KIM Diane E. - - 4% 20% 40% 30% 6%
56 ROBERTSON Lily 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
57 GREGORY Elizabeth - - 6% 28% 46% 18% 2%
58 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. - 3% 20% 45% 27% 5% -
59 DESAMOURS Sabine I. - 5% 19% 34% 30% 11% 1%
59 GERARDIN Marie 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
61 DOUGLAS Julia F. - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
62 WEBER Nora 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
63 GIORDANO Giorgia 3% 16% 31% 30% 15% 4% -
64 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. - - 4% 19% 36% 31% 9%
65 WASIAK Axelle - 2% 12% 33% 38% 14% 2%
66 MCLANE Lauren - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 19%
67 LIN Katie Y. - 1% 5% 19% 37% 31% 7%
68 LURYE Sarah - - - 3% 17% 41% 37%
68 ZHU Chenxi (Heidi) - 2% 11% 31% 37% 17% 2%
70 HEDVAT Alexis S. - 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
71 MACHULSKY Leehi - - 1% 8% 30% 46% 15%
72 TONG Sarah Shen 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
73 CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) - 1% 7% 22% 34% 27% 8%
74 IGOE Nirali B. 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1%
75 TAYLOR Audrey Y. - 1% 9% 28% 38% 21% 3%
76 SCHAFF Marlene M. 3% 18% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
77 BINDAS Blodwen S. - 2% 12% 30% 35% 19% 4%
77 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. - - 2% 15% 38% 35% 9%
79 WATRALL Christina - 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 2%
80 KOWALSKY Rachel A. - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
81 REITINGER Emilie B. - 7% 29% 38% 21% 4% -
82 YOON Julia J. - 4% 20% 37% 30% 9% 1%
83 BELSLEY Devon K. 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
84 WANG Karen - - 2% 11% 29% 39% 19%
85 GANDHI Sedna S. - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 12%
86 LEE Olive 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
87 CHOI Eunice 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
88 PARTE Isabella B. 1% 16% 39% 32% 11% 2% -
89 PAPADAKIS Lily 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
90 GUO ZI SHAN - - - < 1% 6% 33% 60%
91 MYERS Helen Sophia A. 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
92 KORNGUTH Lindsay 5% 23% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
93 PYO Yunice - 2% 10% 28% 36% 20% 3%
94 SLACKMAN Valerie 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
95 ZHANG Tina 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
96 HENRY Asha S. 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 2%
97 QURESHI Aafreen - 5% 24% 41% 24% 6% -
98 LIVERANT Jordan S. - 3% 16% 35% 33% 12% 1%
99 ADAMS KIM Madeline - - 5% 21% 40% 28% 5%
99 BARON Sabina 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
101 DUNBAR Breck L. 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
102 WHITTEMORE Lucy K. - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 3%
102 DILAWRI Anika 30% 46% 20% 4% - - -
104 REID Sobia - 3% 15% 34% 33% 13% 2%
105 MEHROTRA Anya - 1% 10% 31% 39% 17% 1%
106 ADVINCULA Anabella E. 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
107 LEE Yejine - 1% 7% 23% 37% 27% 6%
107 WOLF Isabella A. - 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1%
107 BEI Karen - 3% 13% 29% 34% 18% 3%
107 HAVKIN Elisabeta 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
111 LEE kyungmin - 1% 8% 25% 38% 24% 4%
111 XU Grace (XinYi) - 1% 8% 24% 37% 25% 5%
113 LAVERY Chloe K. 3% 16% 32% 30% 15% 4% -
114 BOYS Nishta B. - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17%
115 SHEN Stephanie - 3% 21% 39% 28% 8% 1%
116 CHU Audrey - 2% 10% 28% 37% 21% 3%
117 PARK Yoohyun (Sarah) - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 4%
118 MAO Amy 4% 21% 35% 28% 10% 2% -
119 NI Emma 1% 8% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1%
120 MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. - 19% 43% 30% 8% 1% -
120 NELSON-LOVE Lily B. - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
122 KIM Elizabeth Y. - 10% 31% 35% 18% 5% -
123 NELSON Gwendolyn H. 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2% -
124 LIU Christina A. - 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 1%
125 YEE-WADSWORTH Sofia L. - 1% 7% 24% 40% 25% 3%
126 COBERT Helen G. 1% 7% 25% 36% 23% 7% 1%
127 GAO Aretha R. - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
128 DUAN Jenny S. 25% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
129 FILIPPOV Nika D. 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 6% -
130 MUCSI Anna M. - 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
130 SAAL Anna 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
132 BROOKS Tean R. - 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
133 WANG Nora - 4% 19% 35% 30% 11% 1%
134 MILLETTE Marie Frederique - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 5%
135 DARANOUVONG Logan 3% 21% 46% 26% 5% - -
136 MING Cynthia 13% 39% 34% 12% 2% - -
137 PARKER Allegra H. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
137 NGUYEN Kaylin A. 1% 10% 32% 35% 18% 4% -
137 KUNDU Anisha - 3% 13% 29% 34% 18% 3%
140 RUNIONS Emersyn - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
141 AHUJA Arianna - 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
142 LIM Clarice - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
142 YANG Miranda (Yinuo) 1% 6% 23% 37% 25% 8% 1%
144 JOYAL Anne-Sophie 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
145 FENG Kelly L. 6% 24% 36% 25% 9% 1% -
146 KIZILBASH Alizeh H. 11% 38% 35% 14% 3% - -
147 EBRAHIM Ameera H. 2% 16% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
148 DINGMAN Amanda - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7% -
149 GU Sarah - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
150 SON Katherine (Injee) 7% 29% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
150 POIRIER Ariane 2% 13% 29% 33% 18% 5% -
152 CHIRASHNYA Noya 24% 40% 26% 9% 2% - -
153 STOJANOVIC Mina 13% 34% 34% 16% 3% -
154 KWON Athina - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1%
155 TONCHEVA Victoria M. - 2% 10% 25% 34% 23% 6%
156 MOSKOFF Tessa 6% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
157 LONG Cindy - 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 3%
158 SCHLOSSER Hope 2% 18% 36% 30% 12% 2% -
159 TSANG JAFFE Avi 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
160 MOTON Mckenzie R. 1% 12% 33% 36% 15% 2% -
161 PAN Michelle 2% 15% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
162 WU ALLYSON 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -
163 OAKE Erica 16% 43% 30% 9% 1% - -
164 WEISS Talia L. - 3% 13% 31% 34% 16% 3%
164 LU Shiqi 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% 1%
166 KIM Erika S. 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% 1% -
167 ARAYE Nasro 23% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
168 KETKAR Mallika - 3% 15% 36% 34% 11% 1%
168 LI Alisha 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
170 BOLES Savvianna 18% 50% 26% 5% - - -
171 BELAOUSSOFF Kira 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
172 YAO Jillian 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
172 HIRSCH Naomi B. 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
172 KIM Zoe L. 7% 37% 37% 15% 3% - -
175 TOMASELLO Olivia E. 2% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
176 O'REILLY Aeryn E. - 2% 13% 34% 35% 14% 2%
177 FELAND Alexandra 18% 42% 30% 9% 1% - -
178 CHANG Ella 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
179 CHAN Cheri K. 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
180 XU Jessica 19% 50% 25% 5% - - -
181 KIZILBASH Zara 8% 29% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
182 CHUNG Sohee 39% 41% 16% 3% - - -
183 CHERNYSHOVA Victoria 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1%
184 RAUSCH Juliana 4% 24% 40% 25% 7% 1% -
185 CHAN Elizabeth 3% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
186 BOTNER Olivia 2% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
187 BRILL Sophie 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
187 SMUK Daria A. 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
189 SU Vivienne 39% 41% 17% 3% - - -
190 CAPELLUA Mariasole 9% 28% 35% 21% 7% 1% -
191 ZHANG Chuyi 4% 33% 40% 19% 4% - -
192 LIN Julia L. 4% 27% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
192 YU Bailey 1% 33% 44% 19% 3% - -
194 HILL Phoebe 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
195 LEE Yedda 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
196 PATURU Meghana - 1% 6% 23% 40% 27% 4%
196 ZAKHAROV Anne E. 16% 42% 31% 10% 1% - -
198 MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) - 3% 15% 34% 33% 13% 2%
199 KERAMANE Halah Z. 47% 42% 11% 1% - - -
200 GOLDBERG Sophie C. 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
201 PATEL Aditi S. - 16% 40% 32% 11% 2% -
201 FALLON Kyle R. 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
203 WATKINS Josephine M. 14% 35% 32% 15% 4% - -
204 DUTTA Amelia 22% 46% 26% 6% 1% - -
204 LESSNE Lauren 13% 32% 33% 17% 5% 1% -
204 MEI Felicity 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
207 LI Tiffany 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
207 CORDERO Allison 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
209 KOKES Ava 1% 23% 39% 26% 9% 1% -
210 BARNES Olivia R. 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 2% -
211 BULK Sierra 88% 12% - - - - -
212 RAINEY Zoe-Andrea 42% 41% 14% 2% - - -
213 DILLE Carolina G. 37% 45% 16% 2% - - -
214 ABDULLAHI Ekhlas 31% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
215 ZHOU Lei 62% 32% 6% - - - -
216 BAJAJ Nikita K. 7% 30% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
216 SHUM Jessica 20% 40% 29% 10% 2% - -
216 PORADA Yarena 23% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
219 KNOX Alexia 46% 41% 11% 1% - - -
220 PEREZ Gabriella (Gabi) S. 9% 28% 34% 21% 6% 1% -
220 VANDERLINDEN Mira 6% 28% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
222 MOK Chloe R. 40% 41% 15% 3% - - -
222 WANG Gioia Serena 12% 34% 34% 16% 3% - -
224 BYBEE Lucy J. 39% 43% 15% 2% - - -
225 LIU Angela 87% 13% 1% - - - -
226 SINGH Aayushi 54% 38% 7% 1% - - -
227 GAO Judy 15% 35% 31% 14% 4% - -
228 CHEN Quanyou Lisa 94% 6% - - - - -
228 ZENG Katrina 20% 50% 25% 4% - - -
230 LIU Alice 75% 23% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.