The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

November NAC

Junior Women's Saber

Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 2:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. - - - - 2% 21% 77%
2 TIMOFEYEV Daniella - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
3 BURKE Nora S. - - - - 4% 28% 68%
3 YONG Erika E. - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
5 HARRILL Gillian N. - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
6 ANGLADE Alexis C. - - - - 3% 26% 71%
7 JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
7 LINDER Kara E. - - - - 4% 28% 67%
9 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. - - 1% 10% 33% 45% 11%
10 WILLIAMS Chloe C. - - 2% 14% 34% 36% 13%
11 KIM Zoe - - - 2% 15% 41% 42%
12 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. - - - 1% 12% 40% 47%
13 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
14 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
15 BAE EMMELINE 1% 11% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
16 WHANG Rebecca - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 29%
17 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda - - - - 2% 23% 75%
18 JOHNSON Honor B. - - - - 1% 11% 89%
19 YUN Joy - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
20 DI PERNA Chiara I. - - - - 3% 27% 71%
21 MOYA Keona L. - - - 2% 16% 45% 38%
22 KONG Vera - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 23%
23 HUANG Sharon 2% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2% -
24 LIU Lily 1% 7% 21% 33% 27% 10% 2%
25 JENKINS Ryan J. - - - - 6% 33% 61%
26 GOUHIN Chloe - - - 1% 9% 37% 54%
27 FOUR-GARCIA Madison - 1% 6% 25% 43% 26%
28 FREEDMAN Janna N. - - 6% 26% 43% 24%
29 POSSICK Lola P. - - - 4% 24% 47% 24%
30 GREENBAUM Ella K. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
31 DELSOIN Chelsea C. - - 5% 21% 41% 30% 3%
32 ENDO Miyuki N. 23% 40% 27% 9% 1% - -
33 GUTHIKONDA Nithya - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 31%
34 OLSEN Natalie J. - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 2%
35 DUNGEY Amelia S. - - 1% 7% 30% 51% 11%
36 DUCKETT Madison 2% 14% 36% 35% 12% 1%
37 LU Vivian Y. - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
38 MORALES Jessica Y. - - - 4% 20% 45% 32%
39 TIMOFEYEV Nicole - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
40 BLUM Leah I. - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
41 MOZHAEVA MARIA - 2% 11% 31% 37% 17% 2%
42 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
43 TAO Hannah J. - 2% 14% 34% 36% 13% 1%
44 ANDRES Katherine A. - 1% 11% 32% 38% 16% 2%
45 GREENBAUM Atara R. - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
46 BOIS Adele - 1% 7% 26% 42% 21% 3%
47 TURNER Zoe Y. - 2% 14% 37% 36% 11%
48 XU Ellen - 5% 21% 37% 29% 9% 1%
49 BERMAN Stella - - 4% 18% 40% 33% 5%
50 OISHI Megumi - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
51 WU JiaQi 2% 16% 38% 32% 11% 1% -
52 BENOIT Adelaide L. - 6% 29% 41% 20% 4% -
53 TONG Kunling - - 1% 7% 28% 45% 20%
54 CHEN Jane 3% 24% 41% 25% 6% - -
55 LIN Audrey J. - 1% 7% 26% 42% 23% 2%
56 JULIEN Michelle - 5% 24% 38% 26% 7% -
57 TANG Catherine H. - 6% 24% 38% 25% 6% -
58 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. 1% 7% 24% 39% 25% 5%
59 KOVACS Sophia - 1% 7% 27% 44% 22%
60 LI Anna M. - 2% 11% 33% 39% 15%
61 HONE Katarina G. - 1% 9% 31% 40% 17% 2%
62 GORMLEY Arwen E. 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
63 FLOREZ Melissa - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14% 1%
64 LU Amy 29% 48% 20% 3% - -
65 SHEA Erin - - 3% 16% 38% 35% 8%
66 CODY Alexandra C. 1% 7% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
67 SHEALY Maggie - 1% 5% 21% 37% 28% 7%
68 LIANG Megan - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 16%
69 FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
70 HE Charlotte - 1% 8% 25% 36% 23% 5%
71 VAN ATTA Grace Y. - 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% -
72 HARRISON Imogen N. - - - 3% 19% 47% 31%
73 HAN Jeanette X. 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
73 GORMAN Victoria M. 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
75 BROWN Emma - 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 7%
76 PAK Kaitlyn - 2% 13% 36% 37% 12%
77 CHIN Erika J. - - 4% 22% 45% 29%
78 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. 12% 35% 35% 14% 3% -
79 REDDY Shreya - 2% 12% 38% 36% 11% 1%
80 MILLER Sky - - - 1% 7% 35% 58%
81 WEBER Juliana I. - 3% 18% 36% 32% 10% -
82 YAP Madeline - 4% 17% 34% 33% 12% 1%
83 CAO Stephanie X. - - 3% 18% 38% 33% 8%
84 LI Victoria J. - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
85 TURNOF Kayla M. 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
86 TANG Annie L. - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
87 KOZAK Sonja A. - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27% 3%
88 KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria - - - 4% 20% 46% 29%
89 BALMASEDA Sabrina F. 1% 10% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
90 LIU Rachel - 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 2%
90 KATZ Anat - 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 2%
90 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 4% -
93 BEALE Zoe M. - 2% 13% 32% 36% 15% 2%
94 WHELAN Brynn M. 34% 51% 14% 1% < 1% - -
95 CHEN Erica - 3% 16% 35% 34% 11% 1%
96 ROH Rachel E. - - 3% 16% 37% 36% 8%
97 TZOU Alexandra - - 4% 17% 38% 34% 7%
98 DOHERTY Maverick L. - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
99 KIM Catherine - - 2% 14% 36% 37% 11%
100 MARSEE Samantha 2% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
101 WU Erica L. - 2% 12% 32% 37% 16% 1%
102 WU Zoe 3% 26% 41% 24% 6% 1% -
103 CHAN Leanne 1% 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% -
104 CHEN Xinyan 2% 17% 37% 32% 11% 1% -
105 YANG Angelina 4% 25% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
106 BUCHMANN Vivien - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 13%
107 WIGGERS Susan Q. - - 6% 28% 43% 21% 2%
108 LI Amanda C. - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 3%
109 LAMOTHE Laurie-Ann 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 8% 1%
110 HOOGENDOORN Sterre - - 6% 26% 41% 24% 3%
111 SHOMAN Jenna - - 4% 17% 36% 33% 10%
111 BOURGEOIS audreane 24% 42% 26% 8% 1% - -
113 FEARNS Zara A. - 5% 28% 41% 22% 4% -
114 CHING Sapphira S. - 1% 8% 30% 40% 19% 3%
115 CHAN Audrey - 3% 17% 36% 32% 11% 1%
116 KRYLOVA Valery 13% 33% 33% 16% 4% - -
117 LACSON Sarah - 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 2%
118 LU Yi Lin 3% 20% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
119 LIN Angela 2% 14% 32% 34% 15% 3% -
120 LI Jessie 7% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
121 STONE Hava S. - 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
122 SHOMAN Miriam - 4% 19% 34% 30% 12% 2%
123 DEPEW Charlotte R. 10% 33% 36% 17% 3% - -
124 SHIN Andrea Y. 3% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
125 KOO Samantha 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
126 WHEELER Kira 22% 54% 21% 3% - - -
127 CHANG Josephine S. - 1% 5% 21% 38% 29% 5%
128 LUKASHENKO Angelina 2% 13% 31% 34% 16% 3% -
129 KALRA Himani V. - 2% 13% 35% 35% 13% 1%
130 HURST Kennedy 2% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2% -
131 CANNON Sophia E. - 5% 24% 38% 26% 7% -
132 YANG Kaitlyn H. - 3% 15% 33% 32% 14% 2%
133 NEWELL Alexia C. - 2% 16% 38% 32% 11% 1%
134 ZINNI Kaylyn M. 1% 9% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
135 LARIMER Katherine E. - 11% 33% 37% 16% 2% -
136 TODD Peregrine 24% 43% 26% 7% 1% - -
137 LIN Selena 8% 37% 41% 13% 1% - -
138 VALADEZ Emily T. 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
139 KOBERSTEIN Maggie - 5% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1%
140 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. - 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1%
141 WANG Jianning 3% 39% 41% 14% 2% - -
142 HUANG Tina 35% 43% 18% 4% - - -
143 BENTOLILA Thalia 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
144 TIBURCIO Diana - 3% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
145 BAKER Audrey C. 5% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
146 NOVICK Mia J. 4% 28% 42% 22% 4% - -
147 DHAR Aamina 13% 37% 34% 14% 3% - -
148 LIN Zhiyin 4% 24% 39% 26% 7% 1% -
149 YUN Maya 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 2% -
150 HOLMES Emma 18% 47% 29% 6% 1% - -
151 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
152 ENGELMAN Madeline A. - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
153 SIMONIAN Olivia A. 23% 46% 25% 6% 1% - -
154 WILSON Isley N. - 1% 12% 34% 37% 15% 1%
155 TUCKER Iman R. - 4% 17% 34% 32% 13% 2%
155 SMIRNOVA Anastasiya 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% - -
157 BUHAY Rachel T. - 4% 21% 39% 29% 6% -
157 RHIE Lena 3% 25% 38% 25% 8% 1% -
159 KONG Isabel - 8% 27% 37% 22% 5% -
160 HOVERMAN Hannah A. 4% 37% 39% 17% 3% - -
161 BAKER Amelia M. 50% 38% 10% 1% - - -
162 ROBINSON Stella 13% 36% 34% 14% 2% - -
163 BILILIES Sophia 5% 33% 40% 19% 4% - -
164 PRAXL Alexa R. 11% 38% 35% 14% 2% - -
165 SATHE Mehek S. 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1% -
166 UNGUREANU Lisa 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
167 ROGERS Pauline E. 36% 47% 15% 2% - -
168 SCHMITT Alana P. 10% 32% 37% 18% 4% -
169 HAYES Grace Y. 11% 37% 38% 13% 2% -
170 HOOGENDOORN Levi - 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
171 NOBREGA Carolina S. 1% 15% 37% 34% 12% 2% -
172 MATAIEV Natalie S. 2% 12% 32% 35% 17% 3% -
173 DARINGA Arianna 1% 9% 31% 39% 17% 3% -
174 LI Angela 71% 26% 3% - - - -
175 ZHANG Judy 1% 17% 42% 30% 9% 1% -
176 PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. - 1% 9% 28% 39% 21% 2%
177 DILLE Carolina G. 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -
178 CHIANG Emily 13% 37% 34% 14% 2% - -
179 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) 3% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
179 NI Sharon 3% 27% 40% 23% 6% 1% -
179 NYSTROM Sofia C. 6% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1% -
182 OXENSTIERNA Carolina - 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1%
182 YERRAMILLI Kavya 8% 34% 37% 17% 4% - -
184 MARQUES Hannah 43% 41% 14% 2% - - -
185 YANG Lele 57% 35% 8% 1% - - -
186 TODD Phoebe 3% 30% 40% 21% 5% - -
186 FU Linqian (Helen) 31% 43% 21% 5% - - -
188 ALCEBAR Kayla 1% 11% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
189 SU Emma 2% 24% 44% 25% 6% 1% -
190 CHEN Grace 38% 42% 17% 3% - - -
191 LIM Isabel K. 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
192 GIRARDI Aemilia 19% 43% 30% 7% 1% - -
193 KIM Sujin 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
194 GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. 21% 42% 29% 8% 1% -
195 JIN Olivia P. 20% 41% 29% 8% 1% -
195 SATHYANATH Kailing 1% 13% 38% 35% 12% 2%
197 YEN Natalie 35% 45% 17% 3% - - -
197 BAWA Sanya 10% 41% 35% 12% 2% - -
197 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. 2% 15% 34% 33% 13% 2% -
200 HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea 22% 41% 28% 8% 1% - -
201 LEI Weixuan (Demi) 78% 20% 2% - - - -
202 LEZHAVA Leah 77% 21% 2% - - - -
203 NEIBART Fiona 15% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
203 NIU Yiyi 24% 44% 25% 6% - - -
205 SHIH Christina 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
205 BATRA Simran 46% 42% 11% 1% - - -
205 KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. 71% 25% 3% - - - -
205 DAVIS Charlotte 63% 31% 6% 1% - - -
209 NG Sarah W. 10% 37% 37% 14% 2% - -
209 MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. 49% 38% 11% 2% - - -
209 AHMED Amina 75% 23% 2% - - - -
212 CUNNINGHAM Erin 63% 31% 5% - - - -
213 LIGH Karis 56% 38% 6% - - - -
214 PETERSEN Kate 84% 15% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.