Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Ivy | D D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 2 | MOLHO Sofia | V D V V V D | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 3 | HO Brianna W. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 5 | SADAN Jordan E. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 6 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | POWERS Meredith R. | D V V V D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 8 | KELLY Katherine E. | V D D V D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | LEVI Lea | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | PO Edith | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 11 | NARANG Maya | V V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 13 | SEGAL Lydia G. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 14 | HOLLE Aviella S. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 15 | CHEN Georgia M. | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | SAXENA Sejal | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 17 | LI Meilin | V V V V D V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | V V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 19 | JONES LONGENBACH Melanie | V V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 20 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 21 | BECKER Elena | D V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 22 | DU Hannah | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 23 | LEE Bethany W. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 24 | WILSON Anna S. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 25 | SHAW Kayla M. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 26 | CHO Lorin Y. | V V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 27 | HEISER Anna M. | D V V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 28 | ZIMBALIST Lila | D D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 29 | SUTHERLAND Michelle J. | V D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 30 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 31 | WERBACH Esther | V D D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 32 | LEE Montana | V D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 33 | LEE Alyssa W. | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | YEUNG Yulia | D D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 35 | MUELLER Tatum J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 36 | ADLER Alexandra | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 37 | ZAVALA-ARBELAEZ Ivanna | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 38 | NITTI Rebecca | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 39 | NICOU Melina | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 40 | ROCCA Mary J. | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 41 | CHEN Jasmine | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 42 | ZHEN Ellen | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 43 | RAI Ananya | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 43 | GILHULEY Catie | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | CLEVENGER Estella | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 46 | SILVER Anna | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 47 | VAYNBERG Ellen | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 49 | SLOAN Emma F. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.