The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Cherry Blossom ROC

Div I-A Men's Épée

Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 9:00 AM

University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 MAZUR Daniil V V V V V D V V V V V V V 5.7 5 -0.7
2 PARK Ian C. D V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
3 NORTH Alexander M. V V V V D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
3 WOLFE Alex V V V V D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
5 CHEN Eric V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
6 SHAH S Ayush V V V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
7 HRAPSKY Ryan J. V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
8 SU Caleb V V V D V D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
9 TABLEMAN Doug S. V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
10 CLICK Aiden V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
11 SHELANSKI Isaac V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
12 CAI Brian V V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
13 HEADRICK Lance V V V V V V V V D 2.9 6 +3.1
14 NOWAK Jakub P. D V V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
15 LI Benjamin V V V V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
16 SHEN Max V V D V D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
17 KHANNA Nikhil V V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
18 CULPEPPER John (JR) R. V V V V V D V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
19 TRIMMER Colin V V V D V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
20 HANSEN Lars D V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
21 NORTH Gary S. V V V D V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
22 CAO Albert D V V V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
23 JEYOON Ryan S. D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
24 SINGH Aryaman V D V V V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
25 HENSAL Nicolas A. V V D D V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
26 GOHEL Dayus T. V D V V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
27 WOODLEY Colin V V D V D V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
28 VELINOV Gabriel V D V V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
29 SAKO Ayrton J. D V V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
30 WOZNIAK Fryderyk D V D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
31 KIM Dylan J. V D D V V D V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
32 CARTER Austin L. D D V V D D V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
33 JOVANOVIC Jovan V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
34 FU Leon D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
35 ZHANG Caden V V V D V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
36 DEUCHER Joseph H. V D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
37 HU Robert J. V V V D V V V D 1.8 5 +3.2
38 ELLINGTON Keegan A. V V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
39 SHREM Samuel G. V V V D V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
40 MURPHY Thomas P. V V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
41 BROWN Joshua (Josh) A. V D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
42 SIVAKUMAR Ajit V V V V D D V D 5.2 4 -1.2
43 CHEN Wesley V D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
44 ROTHKA Spencer J. D V D V V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
45 MCDANIELS Jeremy D V V V V D V D 5.0 4 -1.0
46 FULLER George K. V D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
47 MEGGERS Davin D D V V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
48 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. V D D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
49 SWANSON Lars M. V D D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
50 CHEN Brian D V V V V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
51 JORDAN Anton V V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
52 HILBERT Gabriel E. V D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
53 TIRRELL Justin J. D V V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
54 KIM Ethan J. D V D D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
55 STEPHENS Corbin V V D V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
56 LEE Aiden V D V D V D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
57 HUGHES Michael D. D V V D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
58 WHEELER Daniel D V V D D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
59 LE BORGNE Matthieu V V D D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
60 USDIN Anton V D V V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
61 SWENSON Keane J. D V D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
62 AMOLSCH Dylan D D D V V V D 1.0 2 +1.0
63 NIKOLOV Peter D D V V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
64 KIM Jeff V D D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
65 CAO Brad D V V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
66 SNIDER Jeffrey H. D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
67 TAMULONIS Fen C. V D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
67 MAROCHNIK Daniel V V D V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
69 COHEN Jared E. V V V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
70 HARDY Tristan L. V D V D V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
71 HERZ Alexander S. D V D D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
72 WALTHER Bryan M. D V V V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
73 FISHMAN Rahm V D V D V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
74 DISIMONE David Z. D D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
75 MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert V V D V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
76 KWOUN Miles S. V D V D V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
77 LEE JoonWon D V V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
78 OTTO Nathaniel B. D V D D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
79 ROTONDI Gregory V. V D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
80 MODANLOU Navid D V D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
81 ABBOUD Michael D V D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
82 ZHANG Sen V D D D D V D 2.0 2 -
83 ZIMINSKY Karel M. D D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
84 BERNARD Jack B. V V D D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
85 HUTZ Michael B. D D V D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
86 BANNEN Nicholas V D V D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
87 SHAFRITZ Noah V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
88 SAUNIER Cameron D D V D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
89 MARSH Alex V D D D D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
90 PAN Colin D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
91 WANG Clayton V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
92 ILYAS Zakariya D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
93 NANCE Jonathan W. D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
94 TOMASZEWSKI Joshua D D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
95 MILLSON Daniel V D D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
96 SO Lorenzo D D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
97 WANG Aiden D D D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
98 WU Shaochi V D D D D D D 1.0 1 -
99 ALI Farhan D D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
100 SEID Zachary W. D D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
101 O'REILLY Robert V D D D D D D 1.0 1 -
102 PETROW Zoryan D D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
103 MARKOWITZ William M. D D V D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
104 WOODLEY George D D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
105 GAUVEY Ken C. V D D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
106 EVANS Allen L. D V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
107 MARTINEZ Joshua D D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
108 PALAMARCHUK Matthew D D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
109 BUI Ryan V D D D D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
110 HULL Liam D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
110 DAN Rex D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
112 BUCCELLATO Joel S. D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
113 LENZ Carter D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
114 ALI Adam D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
115 MORET Eric N. D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
116 DAN Chuntao D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
116 WATERS Nathaniel D D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
116 FORAIDA Khalid D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
116 WATSON Raymond D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
120 KANG JUNWOO D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
121 GIAMPETRO Nicholas D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.