Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FIGUEREDO Adrian | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 2 | WESTERN Rafael | - | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
| 3 | HARE John R. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 3 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 5 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 6 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 7 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% |
| 8 | BROU Inkosi | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 10 | HONG Steven | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 11 | CORTEZ Christopher | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 12 | WONG Tzer | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 13 | HOLMES Aiden G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 14 | KANG evan R. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | ZHAO Lucas | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | HO Kaden M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 17 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 18 | STAMIS Kyle | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 20 | CHEN Evan P. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | ZHOU Miles | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 22 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | TENG Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 24 | DEPEW Spencer | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | PAN Alex | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 26 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 27 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 28 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
| 29 | TIAGI Daniel | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHENG Hong | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LIN Maxim | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 32 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 33 | GLOZMAN Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 1% |
| 34 | OH Triton | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 35 | EDELMAN Seth A. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% |
| 37 | STONE Christopher A. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 38 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 39 | FORMENTI Giulio | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | CHEN Samuel | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GUFFEY Christopher | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 42 | HUROWITZ Max | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LIU Kevin | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | PIWOWAR Alex | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | KIM ELIJAH | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 46 | ALFAU LARACUENTE Gabriel | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WEN Edward | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | HUANG Tom | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | - |
| 50 | PERRON Robert | 5% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LIU Lawrence | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | SUGIURA Samuel | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | CHOKSI Vihaan | 2% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LAU Justin Y. | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 55 | ZHENG LEON | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | HAN Daniel Y. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 57 | MURTHY mukund | - | < 1% | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 58 | KIM Matthew | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 58 | KIM Theodore | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | HUFF Clayton R. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | XU Justin | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | TIAGI George | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | WANG Weiyun | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | WU Richard | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | GONG Jerry | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | KUMAR Arjun | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | HENDERSON Jack | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 69 | KOGAN Nikita | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | FORD Tyler J. | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 71 | BHATIA Ekam | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | LUCAS Hayden | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 73 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 74 | AMES Kylan | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | COURTIN Frederic | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | BARROWS Hunter | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.