Bay Regional Fencing Alliance - Freeland, MI, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | D V D V V | V V V V | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 2 | KIM Daniel | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 3 | OWENS Andrew J. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | BONE Porter | D V V V V | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 5 | VANOYEN Dominick | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 6 | KAROLAK Dale W. | D D V V V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 7 | BASS Nathan | D V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 8 | GREEN Zachary J. | V D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 9 | OWENS Carrie M. | V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 10 | OWENS Luke J. | V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 11 | HARRISON Gabriel | V D V V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 12 | HENDRIAN Rachel M. | D V V D D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 13 | POGOSIAN Roman | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 14 | GOEL Noam | D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 15 | KIMMEL Joseph | V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 16 | ZHAO Aimee | D D D D D | V D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 17 | CASS-CALAY Shannon | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 18 | OXIE Matthew | D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.