The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Division 1 Championships/April NAC

Junior Women's Épée

Friday, April 21, 2023 at 1:00 PM

America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WU Fan - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
2 GU Sarah - - - 4% 20% 42% 33%
3 XIAO Ruien - 1% 6% 23% 43% 28%
3 BEZUGLAYA Varvara 2% 11% 27% 33% 20% 6% -
5 KHAMIS Yasmine A. - - - 1% 6% 32% 61%
6 CHIN Isabella - - - 3% 16% 41% 39%
7 OXENREIDER Tierna A. - - - 2% 11% 37% 51%
8 MACHULSKY Leehi - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
9 GAJJALA Sharika R. - - 4% 18% 42% 35%
10 MAO Amy - 1% 5% 20% 36% 30% 8%
11 XUAN Nicole J. - - - 3% 17% 43% 38%
12 TYLER Syd - 1% 7% 25% 43% 25%
13 LUO Ashley - - 2% 12% 33% 37% 15%
14 DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia - 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 3%
15 LEE Scarlett 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
16 MEHROTRA Anya - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
17 KETKAR Ketki - - - - 4% 27% 68%
18 ZHANG Victoria R. - - 4% 18% 37% 31% 9%
19 ZIGALO Elizabeth - - 3% 14% 35% 36% 11%
20 WANG Elizabeth - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
21 WANG Karen - - - 4% 18% 42% 35%
22 KORFONTA Jolie - - 2% 10% 31% 40% 18%
23 ZUHARS Renee A. - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 21%
24 LEE REGINA - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
25 KIM Zoe L. - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
26 YU Nicole J. - 4% 19% 38% 31% 8%
27 CHEN Lefu - 3% 14% 34% 36% 13%
28 RUNIONS Emersyn 2% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
29 YAO Melinda - 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
30 WONG Alexandra R. 11% 35% 36% 15% 3% -
31 REID Anousheh 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
32 ELSTON Sophia - 6% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
33 JOYCE Michaela - - - 1% 6% 32% 61%
34 NGUYEN Tallulah - 1% 5% 19% 36% 31% 8%
35 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. - 6% 26% 47% 21%
36 FALLON Kyle R. - - - 3% 16% 42% 38%
37 WATRALL Christina - - - 3% 17% 42% 37%
38 YIN Julia - - 2% 10% 29% 40% 19%
39 SPRINGER Sierra - 1% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
40 PEHLIVANI Zara - 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 3%
41 WU Amelia - - 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
42 WITTER Catherine A. - 3% 16% 33% 32% 13% 2%
43 HONG Elaine 1% 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1%
44 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. - 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
45 KIM Jayna 4% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1%
46 SWENSON Nikita G. 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
47 JAKEL Sophia N. - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
48 BARG Daniella 2% 14% 32% 33% 15% 3% -
49 LEANG Priscilla Y. - 4% 17% 34% 31% 12% 1%
50 HESS Heidi J. 8% 27% 34% 22% 7% 1% -
50 CAFASSO Natalya 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
52 FENG ge 1% 11% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
53 NGUYEN Kaylin A. - - 4% 18% 38% 34% 6%
54 YANG Alisa - 3% 17% 40% 33% 7%
55 SMUK Alexandra S. 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1%
56 BECKMAN Ana 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1%
57 QI Jarynne Valerie 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% -
58 BUSH emma 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
58 SONG Angela 1% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5% -
60 YAO Yilin 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1%
61 LU Junyao - 1% 8% 25% 38% 25% 4%
62 KUMAR Eva 12% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
63 LEE Olivia 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
64 MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) 1% 6% 25% 39% 25% 5%
65 SU Evelyn 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
66 WANG Jessie 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
67 WANG Ziqi (yoyo) 2% 15% 34% 34% 13% 2%
68 PRIHODKO Nina 6% 30% 41% 20% 4% -
69 WANG Angelina 26% 42% 25% 6% 1% -
70 SMOTRITSKY Mia - 4% 20% 41% 29% 5%
71 AI Amy 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
72 LEE Sumin - 2% 15% 44% 38%
73 GUMAGAY Erika L. 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
74 LEUNG Natalie - 1% 5% 20% 37% 30% 8%
75 LIN Waiyuk - - 4% 17% 37% 33% 9%
76 ALEXANDROV Katherine S. - 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4%
77 DESAI Meera P. 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 1%
78 KORKIN Alice 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
79 KETKAR Mallika - 1% 5% 20% 37% 30% 8%
80 LI Alisha 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 3% -
81 LEE Natasha 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 4%
82 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
83 REMEZA Alissa - 1% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6%
84 PAPADAKIS Lily - 1% 9% 27% 39% 21% 2%
85 AZMEH nour 6% 23% 34% 25% 9% 2% -
85 LI Fei 4% 29% 39% 22% 6% 1% -
87 YOUNG VIVIAN 3% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
88 SMUK Daria A. - 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
89 PHUKAN Indra 4% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1% -
90 BASRALIAN Azniv 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
91 LIN Elaine - 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
92 LAN Alice S. - 2% 10% 29% 36% 20% 3%
93 DENG Annie 23% 40% 27% 9% 1% - -
94 POTAPENKO Margarita D. 1% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6% 1%
95 DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. - 4% 19% 38% 31% 7%
96 GUO Luxi 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% -
97 DOUGLAS Marketa F. 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
97 PINNAMANENI Drithi 26% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
99 CAPELLUA Mariasole - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
100 LIU Nicole 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
101 BARG Margaret 23% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
102 SHARMA Sanvi 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% - -
103 WANG Victoria 16% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
104 MUELLER Emma M. 4% 21% 36% 27% 10% 1% -
105 YOU Emily 4% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
106 LI Zhenni (Jenny) 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
107 MUN Brianna K. 19% 43% 30% 7% 1%
108 ZHU Serene M. 17% 42% 32% 8% 1%
108 GUJJA Misha 16% 41% 33% 9% 1%
110 PANT Anisha 12% 36% 35% 15% 3% -
111 REKEDA Anna 53% 37% 9% 1% - -
112 DONGES Anna 31% 43% 21% 4% - -
113 CARRIER Meredith 9% 32% 37% 18% 4% -
114 WALLER DEL VALLE Alexandra 37% 42% 17% 3% - - -
115 CANNING Charlotte 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
116 NAKA Emily 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% - -
117 LIN Ashley 2% 21% 38% 28% 10% 1% -
117 SHELIN Chelsea 3% 20% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
119 CHISHOLM Phoebe C. 4% 20% 37% 28% 10% 2% -
120 LIN Ariel 18% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
121 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
122 WATTANAKIT Anda 8% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
123 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) 1% 7% 23% 36% 25% 7% -
124 ANDERSON Claire 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
124 STOECKEL Sofia I. 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
126 CHANG Chloe 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
127 HUANG Lanlan 13% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
128 SHELTON Devyn 77% 21% 2% - - - -
129 LEE Yedda 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 2% -
130 KUKVA Taisiya 6% 31% 41% 19% 3% -
131 NELSON Grace E. 47% 39% 12% 2% - - -
132 LIU Christina A. 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
133 WITTE Vera 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% -
134 POON Desiree 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
135 CHERNIS Zoe C. 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% -
136 HSIU Elizabeth 11% 35% 35% 16% 4% - -
137 MENDOZA zoie 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
137 MARTIN Adriana 65% 30% 5% - - - -
139 HOPKINS Leila 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.