The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Buckie Leach RYC & Non-Regional Y8

Y-14 Men's Saber

Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 4:30 PM

New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BRANDT Jaden - - - 4% 18% 43% 34%
2 CARRINGTON IV William T. - - - 4% 31% 65%
3 KIM Ethan - - - - 5% 29% 66%
3 ZHAO Lucas - - - 5% 25% 45% 24%
5 BONETTI Brayden - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 21%
6 FADEL Alexander - - 2% 12% 32% 39% 15%
7 DE SIENA Salvatore - 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3%
8 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas - 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 6%
9 OH Aster - 3% 15% 37% 36% 9%
10 CLARK Aram - - - 3% 33% 64%
11 SALDARINI Glenn - - - 3% 19% 45% 32%
12 SRIVATS Vedh - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 19%
13 BAI Evan - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
14 BUIKEVICH Ihnat - 1% 9% 29% 41% 20%
15 BIVIJI Ali - - 3% 23% 55% 18%
16 PINTO Marcus - - 1% 8% 26% 40% 24%
17 OLOUGHLIN Quin - 4% 21% 43% 29% 3%
18 DOMINIQUE Remson - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
19 SUBA Lucas - 2% 10% 27% 35% 22% 5%
20 SADHU Neiyam 4% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2% -
21 ZHAO Royce 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 5%
22 LEE Anderson - 1% 10% 31% 39% 17% 2%
23 CHANG Timothy - 5% 22% 39% 26% 6% -
24 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 7% 28% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
25 VILEMAITIS Tadas - 4% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3%
26 LEE Matthew - 6% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
27 WONG Caleb W. 3% 19% 38% 30% 9% 1%
28 MUNJULURI ruhaan 39% 42% 16% 3% - -
29 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary - 2% 12% 32% 39% 16%
30 SARWAHI Viraat 3% 16% 32% 31% 14% 3% -
31 DEELY Hartigan - 3% 15% 32% 34% 15% 1%
32 MENON Arjun 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
33 PRIEUR Christian F. - 5% 21% 35% 28% 10% 1%
34 BALE ATMAN 1% 5% 20% 34% 29% 10% 1%
35 KENNEDY Tomás 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
36 RAJMOHAN Arya 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 3%
37 FORSTED Ian - - 4% 20% 42% 34%
38 LAMTAN Christoffer 3% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
39 HU Jayden 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
40 LOO Jason 1% 9% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
41 LIU Ryan - 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3%
42 SHENOY Rowan 6% 34% 41% 17% 2% -
43 BHANDARE Niev 4% 25% 44% 24% 3% -
44 LIU Alexander 14% 40% 35% 10% 1% -
45 SONG Nicholas 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% -
46 JIANG Terence 28% 45% 23% 4% - -
47 ROSADO Sebastian 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
48 FRANCO James 14% 41% 34% 10% 1% - -
49 WEISS Toby 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
50 SONG Aidan 1% 8% 26% 35% 23% 6% 1%
51 VAHABZADEH Jake R. 5% 28% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
52 ARVIND Adhijay 6% 26% 39% 23% 5% - -
53 OREN Daniel 8% 31% 37% 19% 4% -
54 TSAI Kai-An (Kash) 13% 40% 35% 10% 1% -
55 BROENING-CHAI Jonas - 1% 11% 40% 40% 8%
56 ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket 2% 19% 41% 32% 6% -
57 FIROOZI Sam 52% 38% 9% 1% - -
58 LOSQUADRO Joseph 14% 47% 30% 8% 1% - -
59 BARENBOYM Michael 10% 30% 35% 20% 5% 1% -
60 DOSTAL Maximilian 1% 7% 24% 35% 25% 7% -
61 BHERWANI Ishaan 52% 38% 9% 1% - - -
62 LEE John 18% 40% 30% 10% 2% -
63 SAYAR Luke 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
64 CAFFREY Ethan 23% 40% 27% 9% 2% - -
65 LI Aidan 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
66 CHUNG Loden 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.