The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Junior Olympic National Championships

Junior Women's Saber

Saturday, February 16, 2019 at 1:00 PM

Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ANGLADE Alexis C. - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
2 JENKINS Ryan J. - - - - 1% 23% 75%
3 JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
3 YUN Joy - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
5 BURKE Nora S. - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
6 HIRSCH Sydney R. - - - 2% 14% 40% 43%
7 LINDER Kara E. - - - 4% 18% 41% 38%
8 THEODORE Maria A. - - 2% 10% 27% 39% 22%
9 GOUHIN Chloe - - - 1% 11% 41% 47%
9 MILLER Sky - - - - 4% 26% 69%
11 AVAKIAN Mikaela - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
12 JOHNSON Honor B. - - - - 2% 18% 80%
13 KONG Vera - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
14 DI PERNA Chiara I. - - 1% 8% 27% 43% 21%
15 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda - - 1% 5% 27% 55% 12%
16 GREENBAUM Atara R. - - 1% 8% 25% 40% 25%
17 HARRILL Gillian N. - - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
18 WOZNIAK Kelli - - 2% 11% 29% 39% 19%
19 KIM Zoe - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 16%
20 MOYA Keona L. - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 20%
21 GUTHIKONDA Nithya - 1% 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
22 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. - - - 3% 18% 43% 35%
23 FAHRI Monir J. - - 2% 10% 29% 40% 19%
23 LIANG Megan - - 2% 12% 35% 40% 10%
25 SHEA Erin - 4% 16% 32% 32% 15% 2%
26 YONG Annika A. - - 3% 18% 41% 31% 7%
27 NGUYEN Thea - 3% 13% 29% 33% 17% 3%
28 POSSICK Lola P. - - 3% 14% 36% 38% 9%
29 HUNTER Nina B. - 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
30 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth - - - 4% 18% 42% 35%
31 LI Anna M. - - 6% 25% 43% 23% 3%
32 WANG Caroline Y. - 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
33 WHANG Rebecca - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
34 TIMOFEYEV Nicole - 2% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2%
35 TIMOFEYEV Daniella - - - 1% 14% 45% 40%
36 SEHIC Cassandra 1% 11% 31% 34% 18% 4% -
37 HANADARI-LEVY Amit - 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 3%
38 WITEK Sophie B. - 1% 7% 20% 34% 29% 10%
39 SHEALY Maggie - 1% 7% 23% 38% 27% 4%
40 HARRISON Imogen N. - - - 4% 20% 45% 31%
41 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. - - - 5% 27% 46% 21%
42 ZEGERS Anneke E. - - - 1% 9% 37% 54%
43 SONG Robyn - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
44 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. - - 3% 14% 34% 36% 14%
45 CHERNOMORSKY Maria - 5% 20% 36% 28% 10% 1%
46 REDDY Shreya - 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
47 HOOGENDOORN Sterre - 4% 18% 37% 32% 9% 1%
48 KOVACS Sophia - 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3%
49 CAO Stephanie X. - 1% 8% 25% 37% 23% 5%
50 LU Vivian Y. - 5% 18% 33% 31% 12% 1%
51 TANG Catherine H. 1% 16% 37% 32% 12% 2% -
52 PARKER Abigale B. - 1% 7% 22% 34% 27% 8%
53 OISHI Megumi - - 2% 14% 37% 37% 10%
54 HOFFMAN Ilsa L. - - 3% 15% 35% 35% 12%
55 ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. - 2% 10% 28% 37% 21% 4%
56 WU Erica L. - 3% 13% 31% 34% 16% 3%
57 IYER Mohini R. 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
58 TURNER Zoe Y. - 1% 4% 18% 35% 32% 10%
59 WEINBERG Alexandra L. - 1% 7% 23% 38% 26% 5%
60 FREEDMAN Janna N. - - 1% 10% 33% 42% 13%
61 WHITE Amber L. - - 1% 6% 25% 45% 23%
62 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 26% 5%
63 KOZAK Sonja A. - - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8%
64 SONG Jenny - 4% 15% 30% 32% 16% 3%
65 IZENSON Lark (Keli) (Lark) - - - 2% 13% 39% 46%
66 YONG Erika E. 1% 9% 25% 33% 23% 8% 1%
67 ROH Rachel E. - - 2% 12% 33% 40% 13%
68 LACSON Sarah 1% 8% 25% 36% 23% 6% 1%
69 PINCUS Lucy Y. - 17% 36% 31% 13% 3% -
70 SZETO Chloe - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
71 BLUM Leah I. - 1% 5% 19% 37% 30% 8%
72 DUNGEY Amelia S. 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
73 STONE Hava S. - 2% 10% 27% 35% 22% 5%
74 HONE Katarina G. 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 2%
75 LEE Alexandra B. - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
76 TZOU Alexandra 2% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
77 GULATI Ria 1% 11% 31% 35% 17% 4% -
78 MATAIEV Natalie S. 2% 24% 39% 25% 8% 1% -
78 LARIMER Katherine E. 2% 20% 40% 29% 8% 1% -
80 TAO Hannah J. 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
81 HILADO Sarah - 4% 19% 35% 31% 10% 1%
82 SCHMITT Alana P. 5% 32% 39% 20% 5% - -
83 TIBURCIO Diana 1% 10% 33% 39% 15% 2% -
84 TONG Kunling - 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
85 FLOREZ Melissa 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6% -
86 TANG Annie L. - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 3%
87 YAP Madeline - 3% 15% 32% 33% 14% 1%
88 CHAN Audrey - 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 7%
89 PINCUS Emma Y. 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% -
89 TUCKER Iman R. 1% 17% 40% 32% 9% 1% -
91 CHANG Josephine S. 6% 23% 34% 25% 10% 2% -
92 DESAI Maya D. 6% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
92 MOZHAEVA MARIA - 1% 7% 24% 37% 26% 5%
94 MILLER Mattea K. 9% 33% 37% 17% 3% - -
94 KIM Catherine - - 3% 17% 37% 34% 9%
96 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. 7% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
97 SHIN Andrea Y. 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% 1%
97 FAUCHER Erin 4% 19% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
97 BECCHINA Bridget F. 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
100 KALRA Siya L. 4% 21% 36% 27% 10% 2% -
101 FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. 11% 32% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
102 JULIEN Michelle 9% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
103 CASHMAN Natalie - 6% 23% 39% 27% 4% -
104 VALADEZ Emily T. - 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
105 PATEL Riya 20% 40% 29% 10% 2% - -
106 FEARNS Zara A. 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
107 KRYLOVA Valery 1% 12% 31% 34% 18% 4% -
107 BAE EMMELINE 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
109 CHIN Erika J. 1% 5% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
110 WILLIAMS Chloe C. - 1% 6% 22% 37% 28% 7%
111 CHEN Erica - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
112 HOOGENDOORN Levi 2% 22% 42% 27% 6% - -
113 FOUR-GARCIA Madison - 3% 14% 29% 32% 17% 3%
114 LI Victoria J. - 5% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
115 BERMAN Stella 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1%
116 DODRILL Brooke 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
117 SUNGA Arabella Krystienne M. 1% 11% 30% 35% 19% 4% -
118 SATHYANATH Kailing - 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
119 BURCH Makana Y. 1% 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% -
120 LIU Rachel 1% 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 1%
121 PAK Kaitlyn - 2% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
122 OLSEN Natalie J. 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
123 KALRA Himani V. - 5% 21% 36% 29% 9% 1%
124 DEPEW Charlotte R. 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
124 CHANG Emily 2% 15% 34% 34% 13% 2% -
126 CANNON Sophia E. - 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
127 OXENSTIERNA Carolina 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
128 PARKER Allegra H. 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 8% 1%
129 GREENBAUM Ella K. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
130 WOLFSON Elizabeth 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
131 SHAY-TANNAS Zoe 14% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
132 CHEEMA Sophia - 8% 29% 38% 20% 4% -
132 DELSOIN Chelsea C. - 6% 23% 36% 26% 7% 1%
134 YANG Kaitlyn H. 2% 12% 29% 32% 19% 5% 1%
135 ANDRES Katherine A. 1% 14% 36% 34% 14% 2% -
136 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) 11% 35% 34% 16% 4% - -
137 KIM Emily 4% 21% 35% 27% 11% 2% -
138 LIMB Madeline I. 2% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
138 KOBERSTEIN Maggie - 6% 24% 37% 26% 7% -
140 BROWN Emma 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
141 BIENVENU Camille C. 16% 36% 31% 14% 3% - -
141 BENTOLILA Yedida 41% 42% 15% 2% - - -
143 HE Charlotte 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
144 BUHAY Rachel T. 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
145 NEWELL Alexia C. - 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1%
146 XU Ellen 1% 5% 20% 34% 28% 10% 1%
147 WEBER Juliana I. - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
148 KONG Isabel 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
149 DRAGON Rainer - 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
150 CODY Alexandra C. - 5% 20% 36% 30% 10% -
151 PETE Gillian C. 6% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1% -
152 MORAN Emma 3% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
153 MORAGA Christiana 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
154 MARSEE Samantha 1% 12% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
155 GEYER Carolina M. 5% 31% 42% 19% 3% - -
156 FOX-GITOMER Francesca M. 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
156 HAYES Grace Y. 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
158 RANSON Margaux 1% 6% 22% 36% 26% 8% 1%
159 BALMASEDA Sabrina F. 3% 42% 39% 13% 2% - -
159 VAN ATTA Grace Y. 10% 32% 37% 17% 4% - -
161 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
162 THROWER Lola S. 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
163 MANUBAG Amanda R. 4% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
164 DARINGA Arianna - 15% 38% 34% 11% 1% -
165 BEALE Zoe M. 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
166 PRAXL Alexa R. 21% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
167 KALEEL Caroline 78% 20% 2% - - - -
168 BENOIT Adelaide L. 11% 39% 36% 13% 2% - -
168 ZINNI Kaylyn M. 2% 17% 36% 32% 11% 1% -
168 RHIE Lena 14% 48% 30% 7% 1% - -
171 NOVICK Mia J. 47% 39% 12% 2% - - -
171 NOBREGA Carolina S. 3% 16% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
173 ZUO Xiaofan 7% 29% 37% 21% 5% 1% -
173 HAN Lauren 32% 42% 20% 5% 1% - -
175 LIM Isabel K. 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 3% -
176 BATRA Simran 54% 37% 8% 1% - - -
177 XI Shining 13% 32% 33% 17% 5% 1% -
178 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea 1% 13% 36% 34% 13% 2% -
179 KATZ Anat < 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 10% -
180 BENTOLILA Thalia 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
181 ANGKAVANICH Anna 8% 33% 38% 17% 4% - -
182 ROBINSON Stella 44% 40% 13% 2% - - -
183 KIM Sujin 20% 40% 29% 10% 2% - -
184 RANGANATHAN Ruchi 93% 7% - - - - -
185 FAY Zoe A. 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
186 KATZE Ashley 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
186 BHOGAL Sukhleen 88% 11% - - - - -
188 MACDONALD Kaylie S. 19% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -
188 FAUSTINO Emily 98% 2% - - - - -
190 BOWDEN Ms Hope A. 34% 42% 19% 4% - - -
190 FREEDMAN Amelia F. 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
192 GRIFFIN Afwe 35% 43% 19% 4% - - -
193 WHEELER Kira 67% 28% 4% - - - -
193 GUZMAN Claudia 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
195 CHARLES Caitlin 87% 13% 1% - - - -
196 BODILY Grace 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.