The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Mission SYC 2023

Y-14 Men's Saber

Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 12:30 PM

Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MEHAN Nicholas - - - 5% 35% 60%
2 KANG Evan R. - - 1% 7% 35% 58%
3 BRANDT Jaden - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
3 KIM Ethan - - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
5 LEE Andrew - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
6 NARDINI Nathanael P. - - 2% 11% 34% 38% 14%
7 ANAND Rohan - - - 4% 20% 42% 33%
8 CLARK Aram - - - 5% 22% 43% 29%
9 KUMAR Arjun - 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 4%
10 WANG Daniel - - 1% 6% 25% 46% 24%
11 HU Christopher - - - 1% 9% 35% 54%
12 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas - 4% 24% 40% 26% 6%
13 GONG Jerry - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
14 ATWOOD Griffin - 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 4%
15 CARRINGTON IV William T. - - 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
16 SUBA Lucas 1% 7% 27% 38% 21% 4% -
17 CHUNG Connor - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
18 EYBELMAN Ariel - - 2% 11% 32% 40% 15%
19 ZHAO Lucas - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
20 CHEN Jonathan - - 2% 13% 36% 37% 12%
21 ZHAO Royce 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
22 LIU Kevin - - 3% 22% 55% 20%
23 SO Preston - 1% 9% 31% 40% 18%
24 WITCZAK Mateus - 1% 8% 27% 38% 21% 4%
25 BONETTI Brayden - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
26 LI AYDEN - 3% 15% 33% 35% 13%
27 NGUYEN Anthony - - 1% 6% 26% 43% 24%
28 WAXLER Ryan - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
29 MATTOO Deven - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
30 LAMTAN Christoffer 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
31 DEELY Hartigan 3% 22% 40% 28% 6% -
32 VILEMAITIS Tadas 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
33 WANG Michael 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% < 1%
34 OH Aster - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
35 PINTO Marcus - 1% 12% 34% 38% 15%
36 LIN Philip T. - 1% 11% 34% 43% 11%
37 SHAPIRO Simon 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
38 SHIPITSIN Alexander - 1% 5% 21% 36% 29% 8%
39 ANDRES Michael - - 1% 6% 22% 40% 30%
40 BROENING-CHAI Jonas - 4% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
41 LIEBOWITZ Carson 4% 23% 39% 27% 7% 1% -
42 YOOK Isaac - 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 3%
43 WELSTEAD Nicholas 4% 18% 34% 29% 13% 3% -
44 LEE Anderson 2% 18% 39% 31% 9% 1%
45 TSATSAS Andreas 1% 16% 42% 34% 7% -
46 KOGAN Yelisey L. - 2% 14% 34% 35% 13% 1%
47 DOMINIQUE Remson - 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 6%
48 TAN Vick - 5% 24% 38% 26% 7% 1%
49 BAI Evan 3% 18% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
50 LIU Ryan 4% 19% 32% 28% 13% 3% -
51 AYDOGDU Hakan - 3% 21% 40% 29% 7%
52 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 11% 38% 35% 13% 3% - -
53 KENNEDY Tomás 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
54 SARWAHI Viraat 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
55 LI Huangziyue 17% 37% 30% 12% 3% - -
56 MARTINSON Torm 15% 36% 33% 14% 3% -
57 PORTER Dupree 5% 21% 36% 27% 10% 1%
58 FIROOZI Sam 82% 17% 1% - - -
59 VOHRA Ekam 58% 36% 5% - - -
60 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary - < 1% 5% 21% 38% 28% 7%
61 FADEL Alexander - 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 3%
62 SUN Andrew 5% 22% 35% 26% 9% 2% -
63 LEE Matthew 3% 17% 36% 30% 12% 2% -
64 HU Andrew 3% 15% 30% 31% 16% 4% -
65 LIU Andrew 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
66 TAYCHER Aaron 11% 30% 33% 19% 6% 1% -
67 GERTSBERG Eli 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
68 MUNJULURI ruhaan 10% 47% 33% 9% 1% - -
69 ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket 23% 44% 26% 7% 1% - -
70 KETT Richard 6% 33% 39% 18% 4% - -
71 MERMEGAS Alexander 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
72 SONG Aidan 1% 18% 44% 32% 5% -
73 DOSTAL Maximilian 6% 29% 40% 21% 4% -
74 KUMAR Avinash 3% 34% 44% 18% 2% -
75 VALENCIA Jose 3% 18% 33% 30% 13% 3% -
76 RINALDI Savio 12% 33% 33% 16% 4% - -
77 DAI Zihou 1% 8% 22% 33% 25% 10% 1%
78 HU Jayden 19% 42% 29% 9% 1% - -
79 LOSQUADRO Joseph 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
80 OREN Daniel 5% 25% 39% 25% 6% 1% -
81 LIU Alexander 46% 40% 12% 2% - -
82 LIN Brendan 14% 34% 33% 15% 4% - -
82 MILLET Etienne 59% 34% 7% 1% - - -
84 LEE John 19% 53% 24% 4% - -
85 GRABOWSKI Stanley 27% 44% 23% 5% - - -
86 SHEYNZON Benjamin 38% 42% 17% 3% - - -
87 LI Aidan 68% 29% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.