Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 2 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | |
| 3 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 19% |
| 3 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% |
| 5 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 6 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 7 | BUECHEL Holly M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 8 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 9 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 10 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 11 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 13 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | |
| 14 | WELLS Tesla M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 16 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% | |
| 18 | LOMBARD Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 19 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 20 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 21 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 22 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
| 23 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
| 24 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 25 | YOU Emily | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | BOURDEAU Emily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 29% |
| 27 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | BUSH emma | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | ISERT Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 27% |
| 30 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 34 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 35 | HANSEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 36 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 37 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 38 | DU Eiry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 39 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 41 | REID Sobia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 42 | ZHOU Wenjun | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 43 | FOELLMER Kristin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 44 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 47 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 50 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 51 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 53 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 54 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MOON Seojung | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 56 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | FENG ge | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 58 | GAO Judy | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 59 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 60 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 61 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | WONG Caitlin | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 65 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 66 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 67 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 68 | MUNOZ Andrea H. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 69 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 72 | POLANICHKA Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 73 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 74 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 75 | BARG Daniella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 76 | BENZAN India | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 77 | BOTNER Olivia | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 79 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 80 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 81 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | SCHMID Carola K. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 83 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | |
| 84 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 85 | SUN Renee R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 86 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 86 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 88 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | KINDEL Amara | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 91 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 92 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 93 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 94 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 95 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 96 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 97 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 98 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 99 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 100 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 101 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 102 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 102 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 104 | ZHAO Alina | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 105 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | MEYER Rachel | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 107 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 109 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 110 | TANG Sze Nga Nicole | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 111 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 112 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 113 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 114 | MIINEA Elena | 100% | 90% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 115 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 116 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 117 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 118 | LI Fei | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 119 | POON Desiree | 100% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 120 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 121 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | CHANG Chloe | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.