Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WATRALL Rick | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 2 | VARNEY John R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 3 | RICHARDS Dick | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 3 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 5 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 6 | AMELI Sean | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 7 | VAN DYKE Frank | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 8 | JENSEN David | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
| 9 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 67% |
| 10 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 52% | 13% |
| 10 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 12 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 13 | GLASS Timothy C. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 14 | NIEMIEC Mark | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 15 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 16 | NEALE James H. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | SEGAL Mark N. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 18 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 19 | JAMES Lonnie M. | - | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | SWANSON Dave | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | RANES Evan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 22 | JUGAN Bruce M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 23 | SETTE Alessandro | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | ALEXANDER Chuck | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | KLEIN Johannes | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | - | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | POPPRE Michael N. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 30 | KRUGER Mark | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | MARSHALL William L. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | CHANG Henry | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 35 | WHITELOCK James R. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | WHEELER Mark C. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | EVANS Allen L. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HUGHES Michael D. | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | BEITTEL David F. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | PITZEL John E. | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | MCKEE David | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | MITCHELL Matthew D. | 32% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | POOLE James M. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | TIERNEY Luke | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | STONE Ken | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | GROSS Louis A. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CROUCH William John (John) | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | CHERNEK Stephen L. | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | SKOPIK Jr August | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 53 | ENGLISH William | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | 5% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | OLSON Mark R. | 50% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.