The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

National Championships & July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Y-10 Men's Saber

Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 CHAMBERS Miles V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.7 6 +0.3
2 HWANG Hagan V V D V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
3 KHANNA Adamantis V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 LUC Cedric D V D D V V V V V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
5 YU BOWEN V V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
6 KOZLOV Lucas V V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
7 HRISTOV Nickolas V V D V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
8 WU Vincent D V V V V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
9 KANG Jeremy V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
10 BAERENWALD Tybalt Wolfram V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
11 GREENSTEIN Viktor V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
12 BIVIJI Adam V V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
13 AGARWAAL Yohan V V V V D V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
13 GU Andrew V V V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
15 ISAYENKO Daniel V V D V D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
16 GRIGORIEV Roman V V D D V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
17 OU Rigel V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
18 HAO Johnny V V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
19 FISCHER Noel V D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
20 BRISENO Ethan D V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
21 ZILLER Rowan D V V V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
22 YU Ian V D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
23 AVERY Marcus V V V V D V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
24 LUCAS William D V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
25 MIAO Heqi V V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
26 GRABOWSKI Alexander D V V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
27 CHEN Brian V V V D D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
28 BEAL Colton D V V V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
29 QI Jeremy V D V V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
30 LIU Jayden V V D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
31 FU BRANDEN D D V V D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
32 MALEK Zak V V D D D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
33 TANG Morgan V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
34 WANG David V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
35 TITOV Zachary V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
36 CHAN Ewan V V V V V V D 1.8 5 +3.2
37 HO Alden V V D V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
38 CHAVAN Aditya V D V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
39 LEVY Daniel V D V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
40 BURRES stuart V V V D V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
41 CHUNG Evan V V V D V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
42 SONG Aidan V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
43 SLAVNOV Anton D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
44 HOLMES Xavier V V V D D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
45 BROOKS Drake D V V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
46 CHOU Qianhao D V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
47 KIM Eric V D V D V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
48 LEE Bill King V V D D V V V D 1.6 4 +2.4
49 GUO Youwei V V D V D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
50 RAMBHIA Smit V V V D D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
51 KAUL Ishaan D D V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
52 KAMURA Kosei V V D V D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
53 VO Blake V V D V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
54 KIM Junseong V D D V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
55 LI Ryan V D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
56 GUO Jonathan D V V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
57 RABEL Sebastian D D V D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
58 EKAMBARAM Rithik D D D D V V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
59 LAU Kyrus V D D V D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
60 BROOKS Theo D V V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
61 JI Derek V D D V D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
62 DENG Richard D D D D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
63 ZHANG Aiden D D V D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
64 LEE Blake D D V D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
65 YUEN Caleb D V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
66 CIECIEREGA MATTHEW V D V V V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
67 VENKATRAMAN Sushil V D D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
67 LIM JUWANA Maximilian D V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
69 WONG Alexander V D D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
70 HAN Kyle V V D D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
71 KIM Mason V V D D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
72 CHIANG Tyson V D D V V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
73 LIU Ryan D V D V D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
74 CHOW Tyson J. V D D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
75 YUAN Alan D D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
76 RABEL Alexander V D D V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
77 JAVIER Xavier D D V V V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
78 MAI Ryan D D D V V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
79 LYU Tyler D V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
80 HAGN Maximilian D D V V V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
81 QI Zach V D D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
82 BABY Henry D V V D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
83 SHAPIRO Leo D V V D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
83 LIN Ethan D D V D V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
85 CHANG William V V D D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
86 BROOKS Isaac D D V D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
87 CROOKS Andrew V D D D V D D 4.3 2 -2.3
88 LU Simon D D D V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
89 LEIGH Brayden D V D D V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
90 VALLETTA John “JD” D V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
91 LO Lei D D D D V D 2.7 1 -1.7
91 KIM Dylan D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
93 TABANCAY Cole V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
94 LEE Lucas V D D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
95 FAVO Christopher D V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
96 CHEN Aaron D D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
97 HOWARTH Hayes V D D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
98 SALMAN Ibrahim D V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
99 NORTON Hudson V D D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
99 CAO HAOTIAN D D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
101 GUAN Dylan D D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
102 RINALDI Benigno D D D D V D D 2.6 1 -1.6
103 ALLEN Parker D D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
104 PARK Layne D D D V D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
104 CANNON Rowen D D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
106 ZHANG Weihang D D D D V D D 3.2 1 -2.2
107 O'KEEFE Brody D V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
108 PARK Sean D D D D D V D 3.6 1 -2.6
109 MUSSON Miles D V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
110 DEGUZMAN Miguel Javier D D V D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
111 DING Kyen D D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
112 LIU Baichen (Matthew) D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
113 RANGE Easton D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
114 STERN Kazuki D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
115 YU Albert D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
116 MARCISZ Maksym D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
117 BADMUS David D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
118 RAJMOHAN Syon D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
118 STYS Owen D D D D D D D 2.6 0 -2.6
120 JASPERSON Nolan D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
121 LEI Isaac D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
122 MISHRA Ayan D D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.