Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | MICKO Fritz K. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | GATES Darcy C. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | VELINOV Gabriel | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 5 | SILVERS Ari | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 6 | KANAR Ian | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 7 | MARSHALL John W. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | BUCKLEY Michael | D V D V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
| 9 | ELYADERANI Paxon | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | PIENTA Chris J. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 11 | BECKER Thomas | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | BROOKS Zachary B. | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | WILKINSON Derek H. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 14 | MITTAL Sanil | D V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | D V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | KIM Sebastian | V V D D V V | V V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 17 | GREEN Zachary J. | V V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | CAMPBELL Alex | V D D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | ELSTON Sophia | V V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | SCHRANK Mitchell | D D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 22 | BOGARD Matt J. | D V D V V D | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 23 | ATKINSON Josiah | D V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | BERTRAND Matthew T. | D V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 25 | ECKEL Anson J. | D V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 26 | JOBE Connor | D V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | FAGERHAUG Aubrey R. | V D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 28 | MCDONNELL Michael | V D D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 29 | OCHS Bradley C. | D D V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 30 | BARANOSKI Chloe | D D V V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 31 | HOLDORF LE GOFF Bianca | D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | ZEHE Michele A. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 33 | BROWN Amanda | D V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 34 | HE Lingyun Matthew | V D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 35 | FLORIAN Alex M. | D V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 36 | KLINE R. Jay | D D D D V V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 37 | KWOK Roland | D V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 38 | JANYSKA Allen | V V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 39 | RIVERA Ricky N. | D D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 40 | CACCAMO Nicholas | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 41 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | V D D D D D | D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
| 42 | STAUBITZ Marc | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 43 | LIEBER Adam | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | MITKUS Marianne J. | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 45 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 46 | HOORNSTRA David S. | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 47 | GRIMA Stephen (Steve) M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 48 | DUTTON Kimberly (Kitty) | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 49 | HOLT Kennedy | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.