UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DEGROOT Blake | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | TSAO Lukas | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | EDWARDS Maxon | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | GOGOI Vir K. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 7 | PAI Lakshan K. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 9 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | MCISAAC Finn | D V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 11 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | LIU Ethan | V V V V D D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 13 | REEVES Liam | D D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 14 | CHUANG Oscar | D V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | XIE Buster | D D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | DEDENBACH Joseph | D D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 17 | MASSIMINO Andrew | D V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 18 | STRINGER David | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | SANTOS Carlos R. | D V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | GUTH Joseph | V V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | NYKAMP Caleb | V V D V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 22 | HEYBOER Jason | D V V D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 23 | SUN Ryan | V V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | GNEUHS Sam | D V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | MAVANI Krishna | V D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | HICKEY Connor | V D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 27 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | D V V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 28 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | V D D V D D | V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
| 29 | HAN Ethan | D D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | DUNLAP Ian | V D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | SLUSHER Gideon | D V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | KUE Temujin | D D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 33 | TOWNE Benjamin | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | DHOKTE Neev | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 35 | POGOSIAN Roman | D D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 36 | LINDOW Connor | V D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 37 | LIU Yinhong | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 38 | NAZARIO Dominic | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 39 | REAUME Nate | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 40 | ZMUDA Aiden | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 41 | ROLDAN-LEVCHENKO Nikita I. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 42 | FRASER Rhys | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.