NJFA RYC / RJCC

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 8:30 AM

SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TOLBA Abdelrahman 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 67%
2 LI Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 51%
3 BAS Liam 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 80%
3 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 65%
5 KIM Yonjae 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86%
6 TANG Albert 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 39%
7 MATSAKH Philip 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 55% 16%
8 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 33%
9 LEWIS Akhil 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 79%
10 XU Andy P. 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 9%
11 YOON DYLAN 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 35%
11 AKYAMAC Bora 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 13%
13 SONG Noel 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 56% 10%
14 TAHOUN Mostafa 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29%
15 LIGOS Alex M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 41% 9%
16 PLASTARAS Trey 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 21% 2%
17 LIN James G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 60%
18 LEE Jonah 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 32%
19 XIE Buster 100% 100% 99% 87% 47% 11% -
20 TANG Alexander L. 100% 100% 99% 86% 53% 17% 2%
21 KOVACS Wyatt 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 24% 3%
22 BRAIZINHA Thomas 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 10% -
23 GAO Payton 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18% 1%
24 GUO Justin 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 12%
25 MAGALONG William 100% 99% 86% 44% 12% 1% -
26 ORLOV Dmitriy 100% 100% 100% 96% 73% 29% 2%
27 LEVY Jacob 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 21% 1%
28 BADLANI Dev 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 55% 6%
29 NICOLL William 100% 100% 93% 63% 25% 5% -
30 SIMA Congyu Josh 100% 100% 100% 97% 72% 15%
31 LEE Brendan 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 30% 2%
32 NICOLL James 100% 100% 92% 49% 12% 1% -
33 TANG August L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 25%
34 SRINIVASAN Vedant 100% 100% 99% 87% 52% 17% 2%
35 JIMENEZ Naveen 100% 100% 95% 73% 34% 7% -
36 JURMAN Therin 100% 99% 84% 46% 12% 1% -
37 YAP Nathan 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 16% 2%
38 WADLEY Brendan E. 100% 100% 95% 67% 18% 1%
39 SURESH Rohan 100% 95% 72% 32% 5% -
40 BAI Brian 100% 99% 82% 43% 11% 1% -
41 PITERBARG Maxim 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 41% 9%
42 WOODCOCK Henry 100% 96% 64% 21% 2% - -
43 LYNCH Owen C. 100% 100% 97% 79% 40% 8% -
44 KAPOOR Aayan 100% 100% 100% 95% 68% 24% 1%
45 LIM Charles 100% 73% 31% 7% 1% - -
46 WANG Brian 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 27% 4%
47 YU Stephen 100% 99% 86% 50% 14% 2% -
48 LINDEMANN Marc 100% 99% 87% 49% 10% 1% -
49 BLACK Zachary 100% 88% 54% 19% 3% -
50 TJON Calum 100% 99% 76% 26% 3% -
51 HOLLIS Sean 100% 86% 48% 13% 1% -
52 FENG Michael 100% 95% 70% 33% 8% 1%
53 PEDERSEN Charles 100% 95% 47% 9% - -
54 TANG Terry 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 13% 1%
55 CHANDRAMOHAN Aran 100% 83% 41% 11% 1% - -
56 SHANNON Jack 100% 98% 72% 27% 3% - -
57 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 100% 100% 100% 94% 69% 25% 3%
57 TRUBETSKI David 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 12% 1%
59 SIMON Luke 100% 89% 54% 18% 3% - -
60 BONOMO Sebastian J. 100% 97% 77% 36% 9% 1% -
61 WUN Jonathan 100% 94% 68% 30% 7% 1% -
62 DHANOA Kian 100% 75% 29% 5% - - -
63 BELOKON Sammy 100% 88% 52% 15% 1% -
64 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 100% 79% 39% 10% 1% -
65 LEE Eugene 100% 98% 85% 52% 17% 2%
66 NADOL Sam 100% 93% 56% 17% 2% - -
67 TAM Kyle 100% 86% 33% 6% - - -
68 BHAN Amar 100% 70% 21% 3% - - -
69 VISHAWADIA Jaimin 100% 98% 81% 43% 12% 1% -
70 VALENTINE David 100% 86% 19% 1% - - -
71 KRECKE Gareth 100% 92% 58% 20% 3% - -
72 LAM Anthony 100% 15% 1% - - -
73 MATTOS Luis Felipe 100% 86% 48% 13% 1% -
74 GAO Andrew 100% 69% 23% 3% - - -
75 SANCHEZ Carlos 100% 21% 1% - - - -
76 COSSROW Alex 100% 66% 22% 3% - - -
77 PEREZ Logan 100% 61% 14% 2% - - -
77 BONTHA Aadit 100% 38% 6% - - - -
79 EGE Nathan 100% 36% 4% - - - -
80 BUNDUS Luca 100% 26% 3% - - - -
81 OEHLER Mac 100% 37% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.