Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 2 | KO Caleb | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 3 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
| 3 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 5 | ZHAI Derrick | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 6 | WANG Mendy | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 7 | CZARNECKI Thomas | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 8 | REN Ryan | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 9 | XU Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 17% | |
| 10 | ULYSSE Jacob | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 2% |
| 11 | CHEN kenneth | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | XIAN kevin | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 13 | MO Ethan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% | |
| 14 | LEE Thomas | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 15 | ZHANG Gavin | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 16 | NOVIKOV Yann | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 17 | CHENG Logan | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
| 18 | WANG Luke | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 19 | OH Joshua | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | - |
| 20 | HU Daniel | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SIU Max | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | HART-SYED declan | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 23 | WANG Ancen | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 24 | YAVENDITTI William | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 25 | LU Hansen | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | CHANG Parker | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 27 | QIAN Zekai | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 28 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
| 29 | KOVACS Harrison | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 30 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | BRAIZINHA David | 5% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | KIM Daniel | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | ROTH Gavin | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | KIAYIAS Anthony | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | BAS Jonathan | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 36 | LI Jayden | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 38 | ZHANG Ethan | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | FREL Vincent | 1% | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 40 | KIAYIAS Alexander | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | - |
| 41 | HU Michael | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ZHENG Austin | 4% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | PAN Jason | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 44 | LEE Kyle | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LIU Brady | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HAN Jiaren | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 47 | MANCHALA Vedanth | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 48 | WU Alexander | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | YOUM Tyson | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | LEE Aeden | 8% | 35% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | MOON Nicolas | 21% | 53% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | DAVIDSON Henry | 61% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | TIAN Dylan | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | ZHONG Albert | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | YUNG Zak | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | WANG Joshua | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 57 | LIU Gene | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 58 | ROTH Adam | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | ZHAO David | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 60 | LU Baisu | 14% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | ALIMI Mousa | 56% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | TIAN Andy | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | HUANG Marcus | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 64 | ROSENTHAL Hugh | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.