Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SVERDLOV Seth | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | HU Robert J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | WANG justin | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | WU Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 5 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | SETO Jing | V V D V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 7 | XI Benjamin | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | SHOUSHA Yassin | V D V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 9 | PALLADINO Ben T. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 10 | KIM Tei D. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 11 | LIU Adam | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | PAN Tristan | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | WONG Maximus | V V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 14 | OKUN Benjamin | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | ZHANG Roland | V V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | TSE Maxwell | D V D D V D | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 17 | XIE Brandon | V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | KARIMOV Amir | V V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | JIANG ryan | V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 20 | CAO Ray | V V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 21 | AHMED Mohsen | D V D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 22 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | V V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 23 | ZHANG Dinghao | V V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 24 | ALABI Tobi | D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | BRADSHAW Carter | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 26 | LEE Wyatt | D D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 27 | SONG Troy | D D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 28 | SHONEMAN Sam | D V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 29 | HELMY Richard | V D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 30 | REPIC Oliver | D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | DOUBOV Andrew | D V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | ZHAO Pierce | D D V D V | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 33 | TRULL A.J. | V V D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 34 | GLUSHKOV David | V V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 35 | LI Jade | D D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 37 | NILSEN Mark | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 38 | WANG Xiangdong | D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 39 | TRAN Spencer | V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 40 | SPRINGER Elijah | D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 41 | CZEPLA Andrew | V D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 42 | CHEN Edward | D V D V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 43 | LIU Jeremiah W. | D D D D V V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 44 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | GAO Victor | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 46 | YIN Chujun | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 47 | PAN Anthony | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 48 | YU Samuel | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | SCHAUER Oliver | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 50 | CHOU Benson | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 51 | ROSIELLO Francesco | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 51 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 53 | LI Jaden | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 54 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 55 | URBAN Leo | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 56 | RIM Eugene | D D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
| 57 | WHITE Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.