The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Remenyik ROC and RJCC

Junior Men's Foil

Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 1:30 PM

Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 REEVES Liam - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
2 DERRICK Blake - - 1% 12% 36% 39% 12%
3 FORTUNE Alexander J. - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
3 WONG Antonio - - - 5% 25% 50% 19%
5 SENIC Lucas - - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
6 NUNNINK Phillip W. - - - - 6% 38% 55%
7 LU Yikai - - - - 4% 30% 66%
8 PALMA Matthew Dominic - - 1% 10% 50% 39%
9 SANTOS Carlos R. - - 2% 16% 41% 35% 6%
10 FANHAIJI Musitafa - - 2% 20% 52% 26%
11 LEUNG Ethan - 1% 9% 26% 37% 23% 5%
12 JI Aidan Y. - - - 4% 21% 44% 32%
13 MCISAAC Finn - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 23%
14 GUTH Joseph - - 4% 23% 42% 26% 4%
15 GATRELL Mitchell E. - - 1% 11% 43% 45%
16 ZHAO Adam - - 4% 22% 41% 27% 6%
17 PAI Lakshan K. - - - 8% 49% 42%
18 CHUANG Oscar - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 4%
19 DORE Davis - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 26%
20 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn - - 5% 27% 43% 22% 2%
21 CHOE Jayden K. - 1% 9% 33% 38% 17% 2%
22 CHEZ Nolan - 3% 15% 35% 35% 10% 1%
23 CROOM Tucker 3% 26% 40% 24% 6% 1% -
24 ARATA Connor 1% 18% 40% 30% 9% 1% -
25 XIAO Bowen - - 2% 16% 40% 35% 7%
26 VANOYEN Dominick - 2% 10% 26% 36% 22% 5%
27 ZHAO Bowen - 1% 5% 21% 38% 29% 6%
28 MCKINLEY Luke 1% 16% 42% 35% 5% -
29 BOYKO Miles - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
30 PALMA Nathan Anthony - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
31 SORRENTINO Salvatore - 2% 11% 32% 37% 16% 2%
32 DUNLAP Ian 7% 27% 38% 23% 5% - -
33 LOCKWOOD Jacob 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
34 MARTIN William 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 5% -
35 RAJPAL Alastair - 6% 28% 45% 18% 2%
36 WILKINS Mateo - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 12%
37 WAKEHAM Paul 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
38 TAN Xinlai - 2% 16% 40% 32% 9% 1%
39 MATLIN Mark 24% 51% 23% 3% - - -
40 LIU Yinhong 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
41 SMITH Cooper 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 2% -
42 KENNEDY Michael 5% 31% 44% 19% 1% -
43 IRISH Thomas 3% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
44 HEYBOER Jason 3% 21% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
45 NAIDL Josiah 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
46 MAVANI Krishna 3% 27% 45% 21% 4% - -
47 ENOIU Patrick 7% 26% 38% 23% 6% - -
48 HOWLAND Jonas 4% 26% 47% 20% 3% - -
49 HREHOCIK Matthew - 1% 13% 40% 35% 10% 1%
50 WAKEHAM Timothy 9% 36% 41% 13% 1% -
51 MENASCO Juliun 12% 40% 37% 10% 1% -
52 COLEMAN Marcus 6% 32% 41% 18% 2% -
53 MARTIN Dexter 40% 43% 15% 2% - -
54 ZMUDA Aiden 27% 51% 20% 2% - - -
55 NAZARIO Dominic 14% 36% 34% 14% 2% - -
56 GNEUHS Sam - 6% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
57 REAUME Nate 24% 41% 26% 7% 1% - -
58 PHONPRASANSACK Grayson 1% 17% 45% 29% 7% 1% -
59 FINDLER Zachary 58% 35% 6% - - - -
60 LAKAS Darius 53% 36% 9% 1% - - -
61 HAN Ray 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
61 HASHMI Mushaf 10% 42% 36% 10% 1% - -
63 NI Aaric 73% 24% 3% - - - -
63 LIN Connor 37% 45% 16% 2% - - -
65 ZHANG Alexander 8% 28% 36% 21% 5% - -
66 MORRISON Eddie 55% 37% 8% 1% - -
67 REECE Oliver 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
68 DAVIS Benjamin 53% 41% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.