The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Jersey Clash RYC/RJCC& Y8

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 8:00 AM

SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TOLBA Abdelrahman - - - - 4% 30% 65%
2 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
3 LIN James G. - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
3 TSIMIKLIS Yanni - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
5 KEE Andrew L. - - - 1% 8% 37% 55%
6 KNIZHNIK David - - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
7 MILLER Aidan A. - - 1% 7% 33% 46% 14%
8 YAO Bradley - - 5% 20% 41% 29% 5%
9 BAS Liam - - - - 1% 16% 83%
10 RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen - 2% 16% 38% 32% 10% 1%
11 LIGOS Alex M. - - 2% 14% 36% 36% 11%
12 HE Xiangrui - - - 3% 18% 45% 34%
13 JIMENEZ Lukas - - 1% 11% 40% 41% 7%
14 PYO Michael M. - - - 1% 8% 35% 55%
15 YAP Nathan - 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% 1%
16 ORLOV Dmitriy - 3% 16% 37% 34% 10% -
17 TANG Albert - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
18 MAO Lucas - 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
19 MOHAMED Murad - - - - 8% 38% 54%
20 LIU Derek - - 2% 14% 35% 37% 11%
21 XU Andy P. - 1% 7% 25% 39% 25% 4%
22 HUANG Eythan - 1% 11% 32% 37% 16% 2%
23 BADLANI Dev - - 1% 10% 35% 41% 13%
24 LEE Brendan - - 2% 14% 38% 37% 8%
25 TIKHAEV Alexander - - 2% 15% 41% 34% 8%
26 PO Oliver - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
27 SONG Noel - - 2% 14% 45% 34% 5%
28 GLEBA Nico - 5% 25% 41% 24% 5% -
29 KOVACS Wyatt - - 3% 19% 45% 28% 4%
30 SHAPIRO Leon - 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
31 WANG Winston - - 1% 6% 27% 45% 21%
32 TRUBETSKI David - 1% 13% 35% 36% 13% 1%
33 NICOLSON William 3% 16% 36% 32% 11% 2% -
34 LI Ayren - 1% 9% 32% 38% 18% 3%
35 LARA Diego - - 3% 18% 41% 34% 3%
36 LEE Jonah - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
37 MILLER Jordan - - 4% 19% 39% 30% 7%
38 VISHAWADIA Jaimin 1% 12% 35% 38% 12% 1% -
39 MATTOS Luis Felipe 3% 35% 42% 17% 3% - -
40 CHENG Ethan - 2% 15% 34% 34% 13% 1%
41 REZA Farazi 3% 20% 38% 29% 10% 1% -
42 KALIPERSAD Neil A. - 1% 8% 28% 39% 21% 4%
43 WONG Jackson - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 4%
44 BRAIZINHA Thomas - 10% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
45 GHEDINI Luca - 1% 7% 25% 39% 25% 4%
46 AKYAMAC Bora - - 4% 18% 40% 32% 6%
47 SURESH Rohan 11% 39% 35% 13% 2% - -
48 SHAO Eric - 1% 7% 27% 41% 21% 3%
49 CHEN Kyle P. - 1% 8% 30% 38% 19% 3%
50 TJON Calum 1% 14% 40% 33% 11% 1% -
51 MILLER Dillon - 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 4%
52 MAGALONG William - 4% 30% 40% 20% 4% -
53 SRINIVASAN Vedant - 5% 22% 39% 28% 7% -
54 LIU Ryan 2% 16% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
55 YU Stephen 7% 38% 38% 15% 2% - -
56 CHO Xzander - 7% 30% 44% 16% 2% -
57 PECK Quinn 11% 35% 36% 15% 3% - -
58 WANG Brian - 3% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1%
59 SUN Henry 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
60 MUNDY Ezra 18% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
61 HOLLIS Sean 3% 21% 43% 27% 5% - -
62 HUNTER Phillip 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
63 ZAPPALA Nikolai 13% 44% 34% 8% 1% - -
64 CHANDRAMOHAN Aran 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -
65 LEE Eugene - 1% 13% 36% 35% 13% 2%
66 BAI Brian 6% 26% 39% 24% 5% - -
67 WOODCOCK Henry 5% 27% 42% 21% 5% - -
68 NICOLL James 10% 33% 37% 17% 3% - -
69 LI Allen 2% 17% 38% 31% 11% 1% -
70 BONOMO Sebastian J. 5% 22% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
71 BLACK Zachary 5% 24% 39% 26% 6% 1% -
71 BAKSHI Aman 5% 27% 44% 21% 3% - -
73 BONTHA Aadit 46% 41% 12% 1% - - -
74 JURMAN Therin 9% 32% 37% 17% 4% - -
75 KENNEDY christo 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
76 DHANOA Kian 19% 44% 29% 7% 1% - -
77 XU Brian 48% 40% 10% 1% - - -
78 TAM Kyle 13% 48% 31% 7% 1% - -
78 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 2% 31% 41% 21% 5% - -
80 BASKIN Lukáš 1% 16% 41% 32% 10% 1% -
81 JANNEY Jonathan - 3% 14% 33% 34% 15% 1%
82 SHAMBARGER Graham 18% 61% 19% 2% - - -
83 COSSROW Alex 35% 45% 17% 2% - - -
84 BHAN Amar 12% 41% 35% 11% 1% - -
85 VALENTINE David 60% 34% 5% - - - -
86 OEHLER Mac 71% 28% 2% - - - -
87 PEREZ Logan 47% 40% 11% 1% - - -
87 NADOL Sam 26% 42% 25% 6% 1% - -
87 BUNDUS Luca 86% 14% 1% - - - -
90 BRENNAN Connor 61% 32% 6% 1% - - -
90 EGE Nathan 84% 15% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.