Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 2 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 59% |
| 3 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 3 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 53% | 21% |
| 5 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 51% | 36% |
| 6 | ZHOU Ryan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 42% | 42% | 7% |
| 7 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 8 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 20% |
| 9 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 10 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 39% | 54% |
| 11 | YANG Charles | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 47% | 42% |
| 12 | HE Bourne | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 13 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
| 14 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 14% | |
| 15 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 16 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 36% | 5% |
| 17 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 18 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 52% | 17% |
| 19 | GUO Joey | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 20 | PETROV Mikhail | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 21 | NGAI Julian | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 40% | 6% |
| 22 | CHAN Joseph | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 36% | 4% |
| 23 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 24 | UPENDER West | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | LEHTINEN Axel | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 26 | ZHANG Jayden | 1% | 12% | 39% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | WONG Braxton | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ZHANG Andrew | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 30 | LIANG Ethan | 2% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
| 31 | ANDRADE Cedric | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HE Ian | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | HUANG Nathan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | YANG Tate | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | YUE Jackson | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | AGARWAL Savya | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 37 | BOYNTON Alex | 16% | 43% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MACEIRA Immanuel | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | PARK Andrew | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | SHU Eric | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KREISHER Ilan | 17% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 43 | MAO Runxian | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 43 | WEI Winston | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | LUK Trusten | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | VALLADAO Derek | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | AHN Theodore | 14% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | GANESH Maxen | 11% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | YANG Steve | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 51 | KIM Andrew | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 52 | HE Gary | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 53 | FEDOR Lucian | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHEUNG Henry | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ZHU Randy | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | LO Ernest | 3% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | HUANG Terrance | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | SHEN Alaric | 16% | 46% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | VALLADAO Balian | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | CHEN Aiden | 13% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | BANUELOS Dario | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.