The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

October NAC

Div II Women's Saber

Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, FL, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 BOYNTON Ainsley V D V D V V V V V V V V V 3.9 4 +0.1
2 LIM Jaslene V V V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
3 YUCEL Emine I. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 CHIARELLI Valentina V V D V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
5 PABIAN Emilia V V V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
6 FAVO Isabella V D V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
7 LUKER Sophia V V V D V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
8 CHUNG Hailey V V V D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
9 SHI Julia V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
10 SENOGLU Irmak V V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
11 HSU Leah V V D V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
11 MANKOVA Varvara V V V V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
13 DAVIDOVA Kira V V V V D D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
14 DANTULURI Shalini D V V V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
15 CAO Sophie V D V V V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
16 ZHANG Sophie V D D D V V V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
17 HUANG MADELINE V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
18 ZHANG Chenfei V V V V V D V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
19 FAN Grace D V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
20 LI Alexis D V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
20 LIN Nicole V V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
22 GOMERMAN Sophia V V V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
23 HENRY Soraya S. V V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
24 WANG Zidan D V V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
25 LIU Sumin D V V V D V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
26 CHIANG Melissa V V V V D D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
27 DIECK Miranda P. D D V V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
28 FANG Victoria W. V V D D V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
28 PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari V V D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
30 GOLOVITSER Maya V D V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
31 VINOGOROVA Sofiia D V D V V D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
32 BERNARD Kathryn D V D D V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
33 DENG Brooke V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
34 LUKER Hannah V V V V V D 2.1 5 +2.9
35 TURNOF Kayla M. V V D V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
36 MALEK Zolie V V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
37 HU Michelle V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
38 ELLIS-FURLONG Ava V D V V V V D 1.3 4 +2.7
39 GRAJALES Hannah E. V V V D V D V D 4.6 4 -0.6
40 TA-ZHOU Emma V D V V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
41 DUDNICK Morgan V D D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
42 CHAVAN Arya V V V D V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
43 KHAN Alissa V V V D D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
44 GOLDIN Nina D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
45 DAMBAL Sasha V V V D D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
46 SCHAIBLE Sofia L. V V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
47 HUANG Doris D D V V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
48 WANG Callie D V V D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
49 DONDERIS Katherine V V V D D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
50 MONTORIO Lily M. V D V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
51 LIU Hannah D V D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
52 ZOLLER Noelle V D V V D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
53 LI Sonia V D V D V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
54 SAYSON Andrea V D V V D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
55 WANG Gloria Ruoyan D D V V V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
56 GARRETT Madrid V V V D D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
57 HALPERIN Elizabeth H. D D D V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
58 BAIREDDY Maya D D V D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
59 XIE Nora D D V V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
60 TENG EMMA D D D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
61 MERCHANT Aishwarya V V D D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
62 TESTROET Aubrey D V D D V D V D 3.8 2 -1.8
63 LABRECQUE Savannah D V D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
64 NAYAK Antara D D D D V D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
65 STONE Coral V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
66 ONG Lauren V V V D V D 0.9 4 +3.1
67 MUNGUIA Mila V V D D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
68 LOPEZ-ONA Mia V V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
69 HU Anna D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
70 XU Kaylyn V D D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
71 GLUCK Myriam V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
72 GUGALA Hanna V V D V D D D 3.8 3 -0.8
73 JEFFORDS Sophia V V D V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
74 BAINS Nandini D D V V V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
75 DHAR Layla D D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
76 OU Yixuan V D V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
77 REN Xinling D D V V V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
77 BORGUETA Madison V D D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
77 BROWN Aria D V V V D D D 1.2 3 +1.8
80 LOO Kaitlyn D D V V D V D 3.0 3 -
81 NAYAK Esha D D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
82 ALAMI Amira D V D D V V D 1.1 3 +1.9
83 LITTLE Avery D V D V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
84 KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra D V D V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
85 NEUMAN Ella D V D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
86 LEE Lauren V D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
87 LEOU Korina V V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
88 FREEMAN Armine D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
89 BROWN Olivia V V D D D D D 3.7 2 -1.7
90 LATYSHAVA Stephanie V D V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
90 NGUYEN Madeleine V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
92 CHI Claire D D D V V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
93 SHEN Emily D D V D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
94 YOUNG Audrey V D D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
95 MANN Sophia J. D D D D V D 3.0 1 -2.0
96 BUSH Bethany D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
96 BLAKE Anna D D V D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
98 CROOKS Riley D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
99 DE SILVA Augusta D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
100 SADANI Jyotika D D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
101 PADANILAM Lily D D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
102 MUELLER Amelia D. V D D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
103 VILD Grace D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
103 BANGALORE Shriya D D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
105 JEAN Emmanuelle C. D D D D V D D 3.1 1 -2.1
106 HO Sophia D D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
106 SVENSSON Siri Lin D V D D D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
108 WUNNAVA Elina D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
108 TURIANO Nadelle D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
110 PROBASCO Leila D D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
110 ALDERFER Katherine D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
112 AKULOVA Kat D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
113 MAUL Judy L. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
114 LEE Kaelyn D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
115 WUNNAVA Ellora D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
116 SHEMONAEVA Irina D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
117 CUTLER Juliet D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
118 MILLER Tiffany E. D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
119 PELLETIER Skylar D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
120 SWEETLAND Lucy D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.