Liacouras Center - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 2 | MARAKOV Allen B. | V V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 3 | TOWNSEND Avery | V V V V V V V D | V V D | 6.2 | 7 | +0.8 |
| 3 | DAO Matthew M. | V V D V D V V D | V V V V D | 6.2 | 5 | -1.2 |
| 5 | CHEN Eric | D V D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | RHYU Kozmo | V V D V V V D | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 7 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V V D V V D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | CHO Tyler H. | V D V V D D D V | V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 9 | HUGHES Levi | D V V V V V V | D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 10 | ADLER Ian B. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 11 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | D V V V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 12 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | D V V V V D V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 13 | WESTEN Zach | D V V D V V V D | V V D | 6.2 | 5 | -1.2 |
| 14 | WIMMER Chandler | D V D V D D V D | V V D | 5.5 | 3 | -2.5 |
| 16 | WONG Nicholas | V V V D D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 17 | ZHAO Luhan | V V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | LEHR William D. | D D V V D V V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 19 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | V V V D V V | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 | |
| 20 | WILCOX Alexander | V V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 21 | WU Joey | D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 22 | SMITH Nicholas | D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 23 | CLAYTON Robert | D V D V V V D | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 24 | YI Kyle | D D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 25 | INSLER Gabriel C. | V V D V V V D D | V D | 6.4 | 5 | -1.4 |
| 26 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | V V D D D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 27 | HANDBERG Paul | D V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | GUI Runlin | D V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 31 | CARVALHO Danny | V D D D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 32 | KANG Michael H.J. | V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 33 | ROY Joseph | V D V D V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 34 | KIM Ethan | V D V V V V D V | D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 35 | YU Colin | V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 36 | SERAFIN Ben | V D D V D V | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 | |
| 37 | FLEYSH Dennis | D V V V D V D V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 38 | PARKER Riley D. | V D D V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 39 | MISHIMA Torata | V V D V V D V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 | |
| 40 | LOPEZ-SIMPSON Victor | V D V D D D V V | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 | |
| 41 | GHAZALEH Thomas | V D V D V D V | D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 42 | FREEMAN Zachary | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 43 | ROMERO Caleb | D V D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 44 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | V V V V D D D V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 45 | ANDREEV Arthur | V V V D V D D | D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 46 | TOPAZ Nicholas A. | D D V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 46 | VAN NIMWEGEN Nicholas | D D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | YAGNIK Yash | D D D D V D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 49 | RASSEL John | D D D V D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 51 | BELSELAH Omar | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 52 | CORRIDON Jack T. | D D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 53 | TURNER Sahij | D V D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 54 | PEREVORUKHOV Ivan | D D V D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 55 | MORRIS James | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 | |
| 58 | MARTINEZ Jose | D D V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 59 | SPECTER Luka | D D V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 | |
| 60 | GULLO Kenji Y. | D V D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 64 | FINK Jake | D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 65 | GUIDANGEN Jason | D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
| 66 | NEEMAN Benjamin | D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 68 | STAFFORD Neti | D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 68 | GUADAMUZ Cesar | D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.