Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% | |
| 2 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
| 3 | PO Oliver | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 3 | BING Charles | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 5 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 6 | DIERKS Kian | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 7 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 8 | LU Yikai | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 9 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 10 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
| 11 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 31% | |
| 13 | LIN James G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 14 | GERVAIS Joel | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 15 | CO Dylan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
| 16 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 18 | GUO Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 19 | DEGROOT Blake | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 20 | LEE Chris | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
| 21 | LI Matthew | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 22 | LEE Jacob | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 23 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 24 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 25 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 26 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 27 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 28 | LI Arvin | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | CHEN Kyle P. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 1% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 32 | REYES Omar | - | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 33 | MATSAKH Philip | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
| 34 | KNIZHNIK David | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 35 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 35 | TAN Aidan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | LI Eric | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 38 | WONG Adrian | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 28% | |
| 39 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% |
| 40 | MILLER Aidan A. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | MOHAMED Amir | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 42 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 43 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 43 | NGUYEN Martin | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 45 | PARRISH Evan | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 46 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 28% | |
| 47 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 48 | ZHAO Adam | - | 7% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 49 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 50 | YOON DYLAN | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
| 51 | LANG Dong Lin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
| 52 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
| 53 | WANG Winston | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 54 | CHENG Jonathan | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 55 | LING Eddie | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 56 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 6% | 32% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
| 57 | HE Patrick | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 58 | HAN Changhee | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 59 | LE Jacob H. | 15% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | GATZA Logan | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 61 | SENIC Lucas | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
| 62 | FUKUDA Diego | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | WU DING-JUN | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 65 | NAGER Noah | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 66 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% | |
| 67 | ROSE Ben | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 68 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 69 | JIANG Bowang | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 70 | LI Samuel | - | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 71 | YAO Bradley | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 72 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | - | 7% | 31% | 45% | 17% | |
| 73 | ORR Spencer | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 73 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 75 | SAGE Michael P. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 76 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 4% |
| 77 | XU Andy P. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 78 | EDISON Ansel | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 79 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 80 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 81 | CHENG Nathan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 82 | MCISAAC Finn | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 83 | KIM Minhyeok | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 84 | BADLANI Dev | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 85 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 86 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
| 87 | ZHEN Ethan | 2% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 88 | WU Alber Y. | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
| 89 | GAO William | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 89 | GUTH Joseph | 4% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 91 | LIGOS Alex M. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 91 | KIM Brian | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 93 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% | |
| 93 | LI Aaron | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 95 | SONG Austin | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 95 | RAJ Jay | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 97 | PAN Henry | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 98 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 99 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 100 | WU Trevor | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 101 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 102 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 103 | PARK Jason B. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 103 | LEE Eugene | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 105 | CHENG Ethan | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 105 | MARTIN Darius | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 107 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 108 | MOHAMED Murad | - | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 4% |
| 108 | YAP Nathan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 110 | WONG Antonio | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 111 | MA Bryant | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 112 | HUANG Eythan | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 113 | FENG Michael | 7% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 114 | HE Kyle | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 115 | LIU Ethan | - | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 116 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 117 | EDWARDS Maxon | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 118 | GOGOI Vir K. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 119 | LEE Jonah | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 120 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 121 | XIE Buster | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 122 | ALONSO Vinicius | - | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 123 | XU Ethan | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 124 | AHN Jun | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 125 | GAO Payton | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 126 | SUAREZ Adrian | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 127 | VANOYEN Dominick | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 128 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 129 | LOVE Aaron | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 45% | 13% | |
| 130 | TANG Albert | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
| 131 | JURMAN Therin | 22% | 50% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 132 | QIU Zhaocheng | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 133 | LIN Michael | - | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
| 134 | MAO Lucas | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 135 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 136 | LEE Brendan | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 137 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 4% | 42% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 137 | MA Andrew | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 137 | TIKHAEV Alexander | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
| 140 | KLYCZEK Andrew | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 141 | STRINGER David | 1% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 142 | SONG Noel | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 143 | WANG Brian | 2% | 19% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 144 | LEVY Jacob | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 144 | YU William | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 146 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 146 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 148 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 46% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 149 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 150 | LORENZO Alejandro | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 151 | DERRICK Blake | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 152 | SMOLICH Marat | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 153 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 11% | 46% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 154 | GNEUHS Sam | 4% | 29% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 155 | YU Stephen | 42% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 156 | SHANNON Jack | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 157 | PARK Rion | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | |
| 158 | TANG Alexander L. | 6% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 159 | SHAO Eric | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 160 | SHANKS Aidan T. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 161 | TANG August L. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
| 162 | WANG Mason | 1% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 163 | BAI Brian | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 164 | SHENG Dalton | 5% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 165 | SEMP Iain | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 166 | KRAMER Ryan | 42% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 167 | SUN Ryan | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 168 | SHAPIRO Leon | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 169 | ZAIDI Adil | 18% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 170 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 171 | CLARK Benjamin | 12% | 48% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 172 | YANG Dylan | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 173 | NICOLSON William | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 173 | GRIEB Oliver | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 175 | CHUANG Oscar | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 175 | GUEVARA Isaac | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 177 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 3% | 21% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 178 | CHO Xzander | 2% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 179 | ORNELAS Matteo | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 180 | ZOU Michael | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 181 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 182 | CHANG Nathan | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 183 | MODADUGU Aryan | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 184 | KOVACS Wyatt | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 185 | BAE Eugene | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 186 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 187 | MCKEE Calvin | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 188 | TSAI Caleb | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 188 | REEVES Liam | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 188 | ZMUDA Aiden | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 191 | DHANOA Kian | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 191 | HOLLIS Sean | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 193 | MCCOWN Ronan | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 194 | TAM Kyle | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 194 | LIM Charlie | 32% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 196 | POWELL Sean | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 196 | NADOL Sam | 65% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 198 | REAUME Nate | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 199 | KRZYWON Dylan | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 200 | EGE Nathan | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 201 | KUE Temujin | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 202 | PETROV Mikhail | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 202 | BLACK Zachary | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 204 | COSSROW Alex | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.