The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

October NAC

Div II Women's Saber

Friday, October 12, 2018 at 9:00 AM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DUNGEY Amelia S. - 2% 11% 26% 34% 21% 5%
2 REDDY Shreya - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 8%
3 LIMB Madeline I. - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
3 BURCH Makana Y. 9% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
5 YUCEL Emine I. - - 2% 12% 31% 37% 16%
6 EDWARDS Darby - - 3% 14% 34% 35% 13%
7 PETTIT Sara M. - 3% 12% 27% 33% 20% 5%
8 IYER Mohini R. 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
9 MARSEE Samantha - - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15%
10 KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria - - 2% 13% 35% 37% 13%
11 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea - 1% 7% 25% 39% 23% 5%
12 VALADEZ Emily T. 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4%
13 SEAL Julie T. 13% 40% 37% 9% 1% -
14 BAWA Sanya 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
15 MILLER Mattea K. 13% 35% 35% 15% 3% -
16 WU Zoe 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2% -
17 KOBERSTEIN Maggie - 1% 6% 21% 35% 29% 9%
18 DARINGA Arianna - 5% 22% 38% 28% 7%
19 TIBURCIO Diana - 1% 9% 40% 40% 11%
20 STONE Hava S. - - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
21 CODY Alexandra C. - - 4% 17% 36% 33% 10%
22 WEINBERG Alexandra L. - 1% 10% 29% 40% 20%
23 BENOIT Adelaide L. - 2% 15% 39% 35% 9%
24 MERRIAM Katherine I. - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
25 DODRILL Brooke 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
26 KIM Allison E. 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
27 ZINNI Kaylyn M. - 2% 11% 30% 37% 18% 2%
28 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. - 1% 8% 25% 37% 23% 5%
29 HONE Katarina G. 1% 10% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
30 SHIN Andrea Y. 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 7%
31 DESAI Maya D. 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1%
32 ROBINSON Stella - 7% 27% 39% 23% 4%
33 WOLFSON Elizabeth - 3% 14% 31% 33% 17% 3%
34 CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
35 CHERNOMORSKY Maria - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
36 NOBREGA Carolina S. 3% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1% -
37 ABOUDAHER Janna A. - 3% 15% 32% 33% 14% 2%
38 LAMBERT Jasmine M. 8% 29% 38% 21% 4% -
39 STOODLEY Theresa R. 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2%
40 GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. - 1% 11% 33% 37% 15% 2%
41 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. 7% 24% 34% 24% 9% 2% -
42 CANNON Sophia E. - 2% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
43 PRAXL Alexa R. 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 4% -
43 PANIGRAHI Sophia - 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2%
45 PETE Gillian C. 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
46 SATHYANATH Kailing - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
47 OWENS Celine A. 2% 19% 39% 30% 9% 1%
48 BEATY Carlee 2% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3%
49 KIM Nam Heui 16% 39% 33% 11% 1% -
50 MATAIEV Natalie S. 6% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1% -
51 BENTOLILA Yedida 3% 14% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
52 PIACENTINI Ava (Ava J) J. 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
53 D'ORAZIO Isabella 8% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
54 BAE EMMELINE 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2%
55 SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara 1% 11% 30% 36% 19% 3% -
56 RANDALL Cathleen Coyle 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% - -
56 LIN Zhiyin 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% - -
58 VANCE Beth S. 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
59 ZENG Xiaoyi 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
60 KITTLE Lauren 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1% -
61 BENTOLILA Thalia 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% -
61 WHEELER Kira 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 1%
63 FORD Sofia 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
64 MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. 16% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
65 PONIATOWSKI Elise 15% 39% 33% 11% 2% - -
66 RANGANATHAN Ruchi 10% 32% 35% 18% 5% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.