The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

January NAC

Vet-60 Men's Épée

Friday, January 5, 2024 at 2:00 PM

San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DRAGONETTI Walter E. - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
2 PERKA Michael - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4%
3 RICHARDS Dick - - - 3% 15% 40% 42%
3 AMELI Sean - 1% 7% 28% 44% 20%
5 WATRALL Rick - 1% 7% 28% 42% 22%
6 VARNEY John R. - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
7 JOHNSON Jeff 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
8 BAXTER Daniel J. - 5% 24% 40% 26% 6%
9 JUGAN Bruce M. 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
10 LIPTON Michael D. 4% 29% 42% 21% 3% -
11 SCHINDLER Sergey M. 2% 16% 36% 33% 12% 1%
12 GILLHAM Timothy A. - - 2% 12% 33% 39% 14%
13 BECK Brian C. 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
14 MARIANI Lou - 7% 29% 39% 21% 4%
15 EVANS Allen L. 1% 8% 30% 37% 19% 5% -
16 RANES Evan - - 6% 26% 47% 21%
17 GRANDBOIS Peter R. - - 2% 9% 27% 39% 22%
18 DEPOMMIER Remi - - 4% 19% 37% 30% 8%
19 NEALE James H. 3% 16% 32% 31% 14% 3% -
20 LOEFFLER Carl E. - 2% 13% 34% 37% 13%
21 VAN DYKE Frank - 3% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3%
22 POOLE James M. 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
23 HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. - - 2% 15% 44% 38%
24 JENSEN David - 1% 13% 35% 37% 13%
25 KAROLAK Dale W. - 5% 21% 36% 29% 9%
26 HUGHES Michael D. 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
27 SWANSON Dave 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
28 LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
29 CAMPBELL Kenneth 19% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
30 WHITELOCK James R. 55% 37% 7% 1% - -
31 DOWNEY Gerard C. 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1%
32 TREANOR Donald K. 11% 32% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
33 HAYENGA Gary M. - 1% 6% 26% 43% 24%
34 FRANK Fred - - 3% 16% 35% 35% 11%
35 KLEIN Johannes 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
36 MASE James B. - - 5% 21% 38% 28% 7%
37 TATU Dan M. 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9%
38 ARTHURS David - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16%
39 OLSON Mark R. 62% 32% 6% < 1% - -
40 TULLY Thomas F. 1% 11% 31% 35% 18% 3%
41 O'NEILL Kevin S. 16% 48% 29% 7% 1% -
42 HOOPES Jr. Richard R. 23% 41% 27% 8% 1% -
43 WHEELER Mark C. - 9% 32% 40% 16% 2%
44 BAXTER David 4% 21% 35% 28% 10% 2% -
45 KRUGER Mark - 4% 21% 38% 28% 9% 1%
46 MCINTOSH Michael 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 2% -
47 DELGADO Jr. Eli M. - 2% 10% 27% 37% 21% 3%
47 JONES John (Mike) M. 7% 26% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
49 LUCASEY Charles (Chuck) J. - 3% 14% 32% 34% 14% 2%
50 KANE Tim 25% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
51 LANDIS Geoffrey A. 59% 33% 7% 1% - -
52 KOERBER Christopher T. 4% 28% 42% 22% 4% -
53 POPPRE Michael N. 2% 17% 36% 32% 12% 2%
54 ASTLE Stephen 49% 40% 10% 1% - - -
55 HVIDING Ketil 17% 47% 28% 7% 1% - -
56 BEITTEL David F. 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
57 BRUCE II Ommer E. 11% 34% 35% 16% 3% -
58 SWANN William A. 15% 36% 32% 13% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.