The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Capitol Clash SYC/RCC & Y8

Cadet Women's Épée

Monday, January 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 NIX Reagan - - - 2% 11% 38% 49%
2 DEPOMMIER Isabelle - - 1% 7% 26% 44% 22%
3 MONOVA Lilyana - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
3 LEE Gloria Y. - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 18%
5 ZHU Serene M. - - - 1% 9% 35% 55%
6 SEREGIN Katya - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
7 CHI Chelsea - - - 1% 6% 31% 63%
8 WANG Sophie Y. - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
9 GANSER Nicole - 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 8%
10 STERN Savannah - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
11 SHEFFIELD Skye - 1% 5% 19% 37% 30% 8%
12 BARDIN Kira - 4% 20% 37% 28% 9% 1%
13 NOH Rachel - 2% 12% 30% 35% 17% 3%
14 SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle - 1% 5% 21% 38% 30% 6%
15 XU Sunia (Tai Yang) - 2% 10% 26% 37% 23% 3%
16 LIN Laura 1% 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
17 SMOTRITSKY Liat - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 19%
17 ELTERMAN Kate - 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
19 WONG Caitlin - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
19 JIANG Serena - - 1% 5% 21% 44% 30%
21 BI Michelle - 5% 20% 34% 28% 10% 1%
22 NOVOJILOV Anastasia - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 22%
23 XU Jessica 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
24 ILYAS Ayah - - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7%
25 CHEN Alicia - 1% 8% 25% 37% 23% 5%
26 LI Azalea - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
27 PINNAMANENI Drithi - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
28 HALL Isabelle 13% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
29 PETROFF Eva 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
30 WRIGHT Madison 1% 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
31 DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
32 WANG Cecilia 7% 25% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
33 QI Julieanne - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 16%
34 MA Sophie - - 4% 16% 35% 34% 12%
35 DHAIYA Tanya 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
36 WANG Ziqiao (Claire) - - 4% 17% 36% 34% 10%
37 NGUYEN Ella - 2% 12% 33% 38% 15%
38 QIU Emily - - 2% 12% 29% 38% 19%
39 WOOLF Fredrika 1% 18% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
39 HALE Avery - 2% 12% 28% 34% 19% 4%
41 TAM Connie 1% 6% 26% 37% 23% 6% 1%
42 CHEN Alina 1% 6% 22% 36% 26% 8% 1%
43 DASILVA Mia 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3% -
44 WANG Chloe 6% 35% 39% 17% 3% -
45 NGUYEN Ashley L. - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
46 GOH Cayla 1% 9% 31% 38% 19% 3%
47 KOVALCHUK Erika S. - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
48 HOM Justina 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 8% 1%
49 LI Alice - 2% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3%
50 WANG Selina 7% 24% 34% 24% 9% 2% -
51 WEI Sherry 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
52 DESAI Ela 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
53 ZHANG Jane 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
54 BAWA Jenya - 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4%
55 RAFFERTY Catherine 5% 21% 35% 28% 10% 2% -
56 LI Caroline 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
56 LOBANOVA Varvara 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
58 SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 1%
58 GAN Shelby 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
60 LEVKOV Maita 41% 40% 15% 3% - - -
61 KANG Yenna 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
62 SONG Charlotte 8% 40% 38% 13% 2% - -
63 LIN Cynthia 10% 35% 36% 16% 3% - -
64 RICHARDS Axelle 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
65 ANEZIOKORO Zahra 5% 21% 36% 27% 10% 1% -
66 SHETH Anayaà 2% 14% 34% 33% 14% 3% -
67 HE Lizbeth 1% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
68 JEYOON Lauren 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
69 AVALOS Sofia 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
70 BO GENESIS - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 1%
71 KRISHNA Rithika 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
72 LY Hannah 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
73 BARNETT-PAO Nora 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
74 GAVASHELI Margarita 2% 13% 30% 33% 17% 4% -
75 ZHAN Clare 15% 35% 32% 14% 3% - -
76 KELLEY Elise 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
77 COMBS Hannah 66% 29% 4% - - -
78 REISNER Gabriella 7% 27% 36% 23% 6% 1% -
79 PRAVEEN Nehara 46% 41% 11% 1% - - -
80 CAO Carolyn 5% 26% 37% 24% 8% 1% -
81 D'ANGELO Olivia 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
82 XU Hua 32% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
83 GALINSKY Lana 43% 42% 13% 2% - - -
84 THIBAULT Azzy 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
85 PERKINS Zoe 3% 22% 41% 27% 6% 1% -
86 GOCHBERG Madeline 38% 42% 17% 3% - - -
87 SANTORO Chloe 18% 48% 27% 6% 1% - -
88 MATHEW Noe 15% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
89 TOSH Audrey 8% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
90 EL BADAOUI Salma 67% 29% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.