The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

UGA Open 2024

Senior Mixed Épée

Sunday, January 21, 2024 at 12:45 PM

Gainesville, GA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) V V V V D V V V V V V V 5.7 5 -0.7
2 MALLOY Patrick G. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 LANGE Eric A. V V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
3 WANG Maxwell L. V V V D V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
5 FULLERTON Houston T. V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
6 TIYA Biaya K. V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
7 NORMAN Christian V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
8 MCFARLAND Kai D V V D D D V V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
9 HUTTO Joshua V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
10 JACKSON James V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
11 THOMPSON Daniel M. V V D V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
12 WOOLLEY Blake M. V V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
13 TEITENBERG John F. D V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
14 WANG Bryan V V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
15 SUNDQUIST Matthew V D V V D V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
16 LEWIS Jared V V D V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
17 JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
18 YANAMANDRA Sidhansh D V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
19 CHUNG Joshua V V D V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
20 WAGNER Lyndsay K. V V V D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
21 SARIKONDA Akhil V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
22 JAAFAR Omar V D V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
23 KULIKOWSKI Adam J. V V D D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
24 ZIMINSKY Karel M. V D V V V D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
25 NGUYEN Hubert D V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
26 KUCIA Michael J. D D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
27 SINGH Arnav V V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
27 MODULLA Yathin R. D V V V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
29 LIN Kason D V V D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
30 KIM Daniel D V V V D D V D 4.4 3 -1.4
31 ANDERSON Mathew T. D V D V V D V D 5.3 3 -2.3
32 REDDY Daksh V D D V D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
33 WANG Aidan D V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
34 ATON Dave D D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
35 RACHEL Dylan D V V V D D 3.7 3 -0.7
36 WILLIAMS Eli D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
37 MCDANIEL Eamon V V D D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
38 ZHOU Alec Q. V D D D V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
39 DAVIDENKO Alexander D V V D V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
40 SOTTILE Cole D V V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
41 CHA Patrick D V V D D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
42 FREY Wayne N. V D V D V D D 4.2 3 -1.2
43 LU Ethan V V V D D D D 4.0 3 -1.0
44 MCCUBBINS Tyler V D D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
45 KONG Chuizheng V D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
46 MCFARLAND John G. D V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
47 PARK Andrew D D V V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
48 GARBER Robert A. D D V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
49 PULLEN Ayah D D V V D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
50 LABROZZI Aidan D D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
51 NGUYEN Audrey V V D D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
52 TURK Reggie V D D D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
53 PATEL Krishiv D D V D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
54 ARZT Nicholas V D V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
55 ADIBZADEH Mehrdad D D V D V D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
56 LEE Aaron D D D V D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
57 LIU Elinda D D D V D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
58 KRIEGER Jack D D V D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
58 ZHOU Alex D D D D V D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
60 NAM Nathaniel D D D V D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
60 SOPER Adam V D D D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
62 PETE Landon D D D D D V V D 1.1 1 -0.1
63 JEONG Arisu D D D D D D V D 1.1 0 -1.1
64 MIHILL Margaret D D D D D D V D 0.9 0 -0.9
65 BERNSTEIN Matthew B. D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
66 LEE Daehyeon V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
67 WILFORD Madigan D V D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
69 HAWKINS Sophia D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
70 DOUGLAS John D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
71 MOSS Riley D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
73 RODGERS Kaden D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
74 EDWARDS Darby D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.