Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | MANN JAKEROD | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 2 | DICKENS Robert W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 3 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% | |
| 3 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 5 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 7% | |
| 6 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% |
| 7 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 8 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 9 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 11 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 12 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 13 | LAPP Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 14 | ROBITZSKI David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 15 | SEIKEL Spencer | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 18 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 5% | |
| 19 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | YI Nathan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | PFEIL Shawn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | DORASZELSKI Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 23 | LENNON Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 100% | 93% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | SOKALSKI Edwin | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | WOOD William A. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | ACKLAND Matthew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | CZACHOROWSKI Mark | 100% | 66% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | CUCCIARRE Pace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 34 | FAKTOR Emily | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | KRALICEK Emmet | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | HUTZ Michael B. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | MURPHY Megan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BJERKNESS Riley | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | RITTER Brooklyn | 100% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | SAFKO Liubov V. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | STANEV POTTS Theodore | 100% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | PARK Patrick | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | MADANS David | 100% | 91% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | ALLEN Sarah | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.