Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LINDER James (Luke) L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 2 | SCHMITT Trenton R. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 3 | LORTKIPANIDZE Nickoloz | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 3 | CHEN Alan | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 5 | JOHNSON Andrew J. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 6 | KIM Stephen E. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 7 | CHAN Zachary D. | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 9 | PARK Donghwan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 10 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 11 | NADILE Henry V. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 12 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 9% | |
| 13 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
| 14 | LIM Ryan Y. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 15 | MOON Sean H. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 16 | BOLTON Braydon A. | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | DEMAREST Iain | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 18 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Akhil | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | KIM Sean G. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 21 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | - | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 22 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 57% |
| 23 | MIKA Casper | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 24 | MERCHANT Marcel J. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 25 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 4% | 24% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 28 | CHANG Eliot A. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 29 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | LEE Kyle | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 31 | LIN John A. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 32 | MCFADDEN Shae Q. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% | |
| 34 | TONG Qilin | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | ATTIG Will T. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | BAILEY Asher | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 36 | VAULES Charles W. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 4% |
| 38 | LAI Adam J. | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 7% |
| 39 | GREENWOOD Thomas R. | - | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 40 | DENNER Lysander H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 41 | LIMB Matthew G. | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | DODRILL Grant | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | KANG Brandon M. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | HARLEY Colby A. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 45 | CAI Lawrence (Larry) | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | WOOD Elden S. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 47 | DINU Nicholas D. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 48 | SMITH David C. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | RAI Avin | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% |
| 50 | OWENS William | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | HAMMER Peter A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 52 | GUAY-TARDIF Xavier | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 54 | LIANG Connor | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 55 | SOHN Kevin J. | 8% | 62% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | AURAY Phileas | 2% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | HOLMES Aiden G. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 58 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 59 | NOBLE Daniel | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 60 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 7% | 30% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 61 | CHANG Howard | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 62 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 63 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 64 | WUN William | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 65 | DENNER Maximilian P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 45% | 21% |
| 66 | CHENNURU Nischal | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 67 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 68 | STONE Jack V. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 69 | KIM Benjamin H. | 3% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 70 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 71 | LINSKY Matthew | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 73 | DESAI Drewv D. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 76 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 77 | BROWNE JR Rolston D. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 78 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 79 | HU William | 21% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | BARNETT Peter | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 3% | |
| 81 | GILMORE Thomas W. | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 82 | GINIS Nathan | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 83 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 6% | |
| 84 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 85 | DANNULL Lukas J. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 86 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | 18% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | YOUNG Nash | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 47% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | MARSEE James | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 90 | MYERS Kaleb S. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 91 | YATES Colum C. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 92 | HUSSAIN Faaris Zulfiqar | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 93 | PASTOR-JOBIN Matis | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 94 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 95 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 96 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 96 | LASORSA Matthew | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 98 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 99 | MURZYN III CJ | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 100 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 101 | CZAHA Balint | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 102 | TREJO Oliver | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 103 | FLORES Peter D. | 12% | 46% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | LO Joshua H. | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | HEATHCOCK Colin | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 106 | MILLER Levi H. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 107 | LIN William | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 108 | ROPER Evan C. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 109 | WANG Jonathan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 110 | VAN DER MERWE Fabian | 6% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 111 | KEEFE Duncan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 112 | LUO ZIRUI | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 113 | PEDERSEN Leif | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 114 | TONG ZACHARY | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | HUANG Ian | 21% | 44% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | DU Gavin J. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 117 | PIHLSTROM Richie | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | ZHOU Miles | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 119 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 119 | LI Joshua L. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 121 | HINGNEKAR Aniket | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 121 | LUEBBE Macklan C | 36% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 123 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 123 | GAFFNEY John M. | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | GUZZO Vito | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 126 | KLAR Isaac A. | 1% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 127 | KOKKIN Jack S. | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 128 | NARANJO David E. | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.