MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | KRAVIT Connor B. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | MORSE Tyler | D V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | ZHANG YuJian | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 7 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 8 | MAAS Sean H. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 9 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 10 | HE Lawrence | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | SHAH Maximilian A. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | HA Daniel | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | BORODITSKY Ethan | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | GROSSMAN August | D D D D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 16 | WADE Grayson | D D D V D D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 17 | CONNELLY Asa D. | V V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 18 | ARIETTA Rudy | D V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | LEE Noah | V D V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 20 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | LIEF Isaac R. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 22 | MISHIMA Torata | V V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 23 | KOBI Samuel | V D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 24 | KOLKER Gregory A. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | V D V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 27 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 28 | LAI Coby | D V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 29 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | V D D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 30 | SCHADE Lucas | V D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | HALEY Aidan | D D D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 32 | SHUM Tyler | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | LI Jeffrey | V V D V V V | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 | |
| 34 | DOTSON Gus | V V D V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 35 | RICHARD Owen | V V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 36 | COTAJ Andrew | V D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 37 | CHEN Austin | V D V D V V | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 38 | HURDAL Leif G. | D V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | DIXON Thomas | D V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 40 | WHITEHURST JJ | V D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 41 | TAHOUN Aly | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 42 | SEELEY Charlie | D V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 43 | WIEDERHORN ethan | V D V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 44 | SIMPSON Patrick | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 45 | FELIX Arun J. | V D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 46 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 47 | FAN Russell | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 48 | BARSEMIAN Alexander | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 49 | GAO Daniel | D D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 50 | MARTINEZ Joshua | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 51 | BLANCHARD Jonah | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 52 | PARK Frederick | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 53 | MING Isaac | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 54 | TAN Connor | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 55 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 56 | ZHANG Bruce | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.