The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Junior Olympics

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Charlotte, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YU Vinni - - - - 4% 30% 66%
2 WU Alexander - - - - 5% 29% 66%
3 KAO Castor T. - - - - 3% 25% 72%
3 XIAO Enoch A. - - - - 1% 17% 82%
5 AHN Jun - - 1% 7% 28% 43% 22%
6 GRIFFITH JACK - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
7 TIYA BIAYA K. - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 28%
8 ZHAI Jeffrey - - - 1% 13% 45% 41%
9 LI Raphael C. - - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
10 XIAO Ethan J. - - - 1% 7% 36% 57%
10 SIU Aiden - - - 2% 13% 42% 43%
12 LEE Aidan - - - 1% 9% 38% 53%
13 LEWIS Akhil - - - 1% 13% 44% 41%
14 HUTH Mitchell - - - - 4% 29% 67%
15 TANG Owen S. - - - 3% 18% 44% 34%
16 LI Eric - - 3% 23% 46% 27%
17 SONG Aiden S. - - - 1% 10% 51% 39%
18 KIM Yonjae - - - - 1% 13% 87%
19 CO Dylan - - 1% 9% 31% 42% 17%
20 BAS Liam - - - - 10% 56% 33%
21 LO Conrad - - - - 2% 32% 65%
21 STANLEY Mason B. - - - - 2% 20% 78%
21 LI Richard - - - - 4% 28% 68%
24 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - - 5% 29% 65%
25 JAIN Aditya - - - 4% 21% 44% 31%
25 CANLAS Nathan - - 1% 10% 30% 41% 18%
27 BANERJEE ANUP - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
28 ZHANG Aaron 1% 6% 25% 38% 25% 6% -
29 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - - 6% 29% 45% 21%
30 KLOTZ Isaiah - - 5% 20% 38% 31% 6%
31 WONG Antonio 1% 9% 34% 38% 16% 2%
32 DINSAY Kristjan - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 3%
33 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - - 4% 32% 64%
34 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) - - - - 5% 33% 61%
35 TRAUGOT Owen G. - - - 3% 16% 42% 38%
36 CULLIVAN Justice - - - - 3% 27% 69%
37 BURKE Spencer W. - - - - 2% 19% 79%
37 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 1% 12% 42% 44%
37 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - - 1% 5% 23% 43% 28%
40 DESHMUKH Arjun - - - 4% 24% 46% 26%
41 SINGH Dayaal - - - - 4% 31% 65%
42 LIN James G. - - - 2% 17% 60% 22%
42 PARK Sky - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
44 HOOSHI Dylan M. - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
45 GONG Benjamin - 1% 6% 21% 37% 29% 7%
46 KIM Ryan Y. - - - 2% 13% 41% 45%
47 REEVES Liam - 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4%
48 DIERKS Kian - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 24%
48 CHENG Jonathan - - 5% 25% 44% 23% 2%
50 SONG Leonardo T. - - - 1% 9% 48% 42%
51 WONG Garrick G. - - 2% 15% 37% 35% 11%
51 LI Owen - - - - 5% 29% 66%
53 KRYLTSOV Michael - - 6% 31% 51% 11% 1%
54 QIAN Jason H. - - 1% 11% 35% 44% 9%
55 NGUYEN Martin - 1% 8% 26% 39% 24% 3%
56 LEE Chris - - 1% 11% 38% 39% 11%
57 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - 3% 17% 43% 38%
58 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. - - - - 5% 42% 52%
59 STRUGAR Marcus A. - - 4% 19% 39% 31% 8%
60 ELKOUSY Laith H. - 1% 7% 24% 40% 26% 3%
61 MEJIA MATTHEW D. - 1% 7% 25% 41% 24% 3%
62 ROSE Ben - - 2% 11% 32% 40% 16%
63 RAJ Jay 1% 6% 25% 39% 24% 5% -
64 SONG Austin - 1% 14% 43% 32% 8% 1%
65 COELHO Cristiano P. - - - 1% 9% 38% 53%
66 BING Charles - - - 1% 14% 46% 38%
67 MIALL Steven A. - - 2% 12% 34% 38% 14%
68 GODZHIK Zachary - - - 3% 15% 41% 41%
69 LEE Jonah - - 1% 8% 40% 40% 11%
70 JANG Jaewon - - - 1% 11% 43% 45%
71 BRUK Peter J. - - - - 6% 32% 62%
72 MATSAKH Philip - - - 5% 27% 48% 21%
73 LIN Youlong - - 1% 12% 37% 42% 9%
74 LEE Jacob - - 2% 12% 33% 40% 13%
75 SICHITIU Alexander - - 1% 8% 31% 42% 18%
76 PAI Lakshan K. - - 5% 24% 42% 26% 2%
77 GUERRA Gabriel H. - - - 4% 31% 47% 17%
78 WYMAN Julian - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
79 LYNCH Owen C. 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% < 1% -
79 JI Aidan Y. - - 6% 28% 40% 22% 4%
81 SENIC Lucas - 2% 12% 31% 35% 16% 3%
82 LI Matthew - - - 6% 25% 43% 25%
83 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - - 4% 21% 42% 30% 4%
84 XIAO EDWARD - - - 3% 16% 43% 38%
84 KETTELLE John - 5% 19% 34% 31% 11% -
86 LOVIN Vlad - - 2% 15% 40% 36% 8%
87 KIM Jackson - 1% 7% 24% 39% 26% 4%
88 DERRICK Blake 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8% 1%
89 WU Alistair - 2% 12% 32% 37% 15% 2%
90 NICOLETTI Luca - - 4% 24% 43% 25% 5%
91 TIKHAEV Alexander - 2% 12% 31% 36% 17% 2%
91 HUANG Eythan - 2% 14% 35% 36% 12% 1%
93 RASMUSSEN Sage - 1% 10% 30% 37% 18% 2%
94 MILLER Aidan A. - 1% 11% 31% 37% 18% 2%
95 OH SEAN - - 1% 11% 37% 42% 8%
96 MIN Eric - - 1% 8% 31% 45% 16%
97 PO Oliver - - - 2% 19% 50% 29%
98 NUNNINK Phillip W. - - 1% 9% 36% 44% 11%
98 LI Arvin - - 4% 21% 45% 26% 3%
100 JIANG Owen - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
101 DAVIDSON Elliot - 1% 5% 22% 41% 29% 2%
102 VALOUEV Aleksey - 1% 5% 19% 36% 31% 8%
103 PLASTARAS Trey 1% 10% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
104 BAE Kevin - - - 4% 23% 46% 27%
104 GAO William - - 4% 19% 39% 31% 6%
104 SISINNI Riccardo - - - 3% 17% 41% 38%
107 PARRISH Evan - 3% 15% 33% 34% 13% 1%
108 LI Samuel 2% 13% 31% 34% 16% 3% -
109 LUH Ethan K. - - - 5% 23% 44% 29%
110 EDISON Ansel 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3% -
111 YAO Bradley - 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% -
112 GOOR Julian - - - - 6% 31% 63%
112 LIU Ethan - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17% 2%
114 LIN Michael - - 2% 13% 40% 39% 6%
114 PONS Diego - 6% 26% 42% 22% 4% -
116 CHOI Ethan - - 6% 28% 45% 18% 2%
117 LEE Jayden J. 8% 32% 39% 18% 3% - -
118 REYES Omar - 2% 15% 37% 36% 10%
119 LING Eddie - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
120 MA Andrew - - 3% 21% 40% 29% 7%
121 DOCTOR Aidan L. - 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 2%
122 LIU Derek - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 2%
123 ROZALSKI Eli 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
124 LIPPMAN Sam - 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
125 WONG Evan 10% 32% 35% 18% 5% 1% -
126 LEE Brendan - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 4%
127 FUKUDA Diego - 1% 11% 36% 38% 13% 1%
128 WADLEY Brendan E. 1% 7% 26% 37% 23% 6% -
129 SIMA Congyu Josh - - 3% 18% 40% 32% 7%
130 LEE Eugene 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
131 WU Alber Y. - - 3% 23% 45% 25% 4%
132 SHENG Dalton 1% 6% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
133 MCISAAC Finn - 3% 15% 33% 34% 14% 1%
134 TAN Aidan - 2% 12% 32% 37% 16% 1%
135 SAGE Michael P. - - 5% 24% 43% 24% 4%
136 GATZA Logan - - 4% 20% 41% 31% 5%
137 LLIDO Soren - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
138 FREEDMAN Samuel E. - - - 3% 23% 56% 18%
139 RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen - 1% 12% 35% 37% 13% 1%
140 XU Andy P. - 3% 17% 36% 32% 11% 1%
141 CORTRIGHT Skipper - 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2%
142 OH Jaden - 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% -
143 WOO Christian - - - 5% 23% 49% 23%
143 JOHNSON Chance - 6% 29% 43% 19% 3% -
145 GUO Justin - - 4% 23% 43% 26% 4%
146 TRUBETSKI David 4% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2% -
147 WANG Brian 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
148 LIN Xilong - - 2% 16% 40% 34% 8%
149 LI Matthew - 1% 6% 27% 40% 22% 4%
150 FENG Michael 5% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
151 LO Preston 1% 9% 29% 36% 20% 4% -
152 PINCHENG Yao 2% 31% 44% 20% 4% - -
153 DORAN Wesley C. - - 2% 12% 35% 40% 10%
154 GAO Payton - 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
155 ARIZA Abraham J. 1% 7% 26% 37% 23% 6% -
156 GETSIN Anthony 6% 32% 38% 19% 4% - -
157 JITTAN daniel - - 2% 13% 37% 36% 11%
158 MAO Lucas 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
159 PALMA Matthew Dominic - 6% 26% 40% 23% 4%
160 GIRALDO Pablo E. - 1% 11% 39% 38% 11%
161 YI William - 3% 16% 36% 33% 11% 1%
162 CHEN Kyle P. 1% 10% 30% 37% 18% 3% -
163 DUSZA Zachery 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
163 JIANG Bowang - 1% 12% 38% 36% 12% 1%
165 ZHAO Bowen 1% 6% 23% 39% 28% 4% -
166 WANG Brayden 1% 14% 38% 34% 11% 1% -
167 WANG Winston - 1% 9% 31% 40% 18% 1%
168 SETLUR Bhrugu 1% 7% 32% 41% 17% 2% -
169 YOON DYLAN - - 5% 25% 43% 23% 2%
170 WANG Mason - 2% 13% 34% 35% 14% 1%
171 KOVACS Wyatt 2% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
171 SHANNON Jack 9% 35% 37% 16% 3% - -
173 LI Jett - 4% 23% 44% 25% 3% -
173 SAH Steven 1% 19% 42% 31% 7% - -
175 TANG August L. - 2% 9% 26% 36% 22% 5%
175 LIU William 6% 23% 36% 25% 9% 1% -
177 SONG Noel - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 4%
178 ZHAO Jason L. - - 1% 9% 30% 43% 16%
178 MILLER Jordan - 5% 27% 41% 23% 5% -
180 EDWARDS Maxon 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4% -
180 BAI Brian 5% 36% 39% 17% 3% - -
182 DAI Christopher 20% 50% 26% 4% - - -
183 HE Kyle 2% 17% 39% 30% 10% 1% -
184 LOVE Aaron - - 1% 8% 31% 46% 14%
184 LEVY Jacob 1% 13% 44% 33% 9% 1% -
186 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden - 1% 8% 30% 39% 19% 3%
186 CHUANG Oscar 4% 27% 42% 22% 4% - -
188 SRINIVASAN Vedant 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
189 LI Aaron - 3% 16% 34% 32% 12% 2%
190 KIM Harrison 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8% -
190 SCHIENEMAN Valentine - 12% 38% 38% 12% 1% -
190 YAP Nathan 1% 9% 29% 37% 19% 4% -
193 PAN Henry - 1% 11% 36% 42% 9% 1%
194 BLEIL Tyler 11% 37% 35% 14% 2% - -
194 KIM Daniel Y. - 3% 23% 41% 26% 6% -
194 LE Jacob H. 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 6% -
197 FAN Yuchen 9% 34% 36% 17% 4% - -
198 MATTOS Luis Felipe 31% 42% 22% 5% 1% - -
199 FORTUNE Alexander J. - - 2% 12% 33% 39% 14%
200 CHENG Ethan 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4% -
201 MAGALONG William 11% 37% 36% 14% 2% - -
202 ZHANG Jacob 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% 1%
203 BLACK Zachary 2% 18% 41% 33% 6% - -
204 XU Ethan 1% 9% 32% 44% 14% 1% -
205 ZHEN Ethan - 1% 8% 30% 41% 18% 1%
206 YUE Jackson 13% 40% 36% 11% 1% - -
207 SHAGIDANYAN German - 2% 14% 41% 33% 9% 1%
208 GNEUHS Sam 9% 30% 37% 20% 4% - -
209 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 2% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
209 HOLLIS Sean 6% 31% 45% 17% 2% - -
211 GRAY Caidan 10% 36% 39% 13% 2% - -
212 SUAREZ Adrian 6% 32% 44% 16% 2% -
213 ZHOU Ryan 16% 46% 31% 6% 1% -
214 KANDAGADLA Rishi 38% 45% 15% 2% - -
215 KIM Andy 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 2% -
216 ANDRIC Borna 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% -
217 KIM Brian - 2% 18% 45% 28% 6% -
218 WILLIAMS Connor J. - 1% 13% 38% 36% 11% 1%
219 WU Lucas - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
219 WANG Rory 1% 10% 36% 38% 14% 2% -
221 SEMP Iain - 19% 45% 28% 6% - -
222 CHEN Matthew 4% 21% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
223 SMITH Grant D. 1% 7% 26% 38% 24% 5% -
223 YANG Dylan - 31% 50% 17% 2% - -
225 WILKINS Mateo 1% 10% 30% 37% 18% 3% -
226 GOGOI Vir K. 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 4% -
226 GUEVARA Isaac 1% 40% 46% 12% 1% - -
228 BADLANI Dev - 1% 9% 30% 39% 18% 2%
228 BOYKO Miles 1% 10% 31% 37% 17% 3% -
228 SHAPIRO Leon 2% 14% 32% 33% 15% 3% -
228 TAN Xinlai 8% 36% 38% 15% 3% - -
232 AKYAMAC Bora - 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
233 NICOLSON William 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
234 HARROCH Faustin 27% 47% 22% 4% - - -
235 CHANG Nathan 28% 45% 22% 4% - - -
236 POWELL Sean 46% 40% 12% 2% - - -
237 JOHNSON Soren 14% 43% 34% 8% 1% - -
238 BRAIZINHA Thomas 8% 29% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
238 ARATA Connor 8% 33% 40% 16% 3% - -
240 GRIEB Oliver 10% 36% 39% 13% 2% - -
241 MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% - -
241 MOE Annan 6% 27% 40% 22% 4% - -
243 PALMA Nathan Anthony 1% 24% 43% 25% 6% 1% -
243 LEUNG Jin 18% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
245 ZHAO Adam - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
246 MILLER Dillon 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
246 STRINGER David - 5% 21% 37% 29% 7% -
246 POLONI Giovanni 10% 35% 39% 14% 1% - -
249 BATRA Dev 11% 52% 31% 5% - - -
249 WAKEHAM Paul 12% 39% 34% 13% 2% - -
251 LEE Christopher T. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
251 ZHONG Maxwell 6% 35% 40% 17% 3% - -
253 KUE Temujin 5% 27% 43% 22% 3% - -
254 REICHEL Ezra 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
255 LIGOS Alex M. - 1% 9% 35% 44% 11% 1%
256 PEDERSEN Charles 10% 54% 30% 5% - - -
257 PARK Rion - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
258 LING Carson Jr 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
259 JANNEY Jonathan 3% 20% 39% 29% 8% 1% -
260 ORNELAS Matteo 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% - -
261 NAIDL Josiah 27% 42% 24% 7% 1% - -
262 FINLEY Dylan 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
263 MORROW Brenden 1% 8% 25% 36% 23% 6% -
264 WANG Ethan 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4% -
265 TANG Albert - 1% 9% 27% 38% 21% 3%
265 VISHAWADIA Jaimin 2% 22% 49% 23% 4% - -
267 KONG Luculentus X. 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3% -
268 WEISS Mateo 14% 41% 35% 10% 1% - -
269 TSAY Jordan R. 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
269 EMENHEISER Conrad - 5% 23% 37% 27% 8% 1%
271 ORLOV Dmitriy 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
272 HUTH Trevor 5% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1% -
272 TAM Kyle 42% 41% 15% 2% - - -
272 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn 5% 25% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
272 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 23% 44% 27% 6% - - -
276 BARRETT Austin 9% 29% 37% 20% 4% - -
276 QIU Zhaocheng 1% 13% 37% 36% 12% 2% -
278 BROWN Darius D. 3% 18% 34% 31% 12% 2% -
278 CAJERO Luis O. 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% - -
280 UZGIRIS Kovas 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
280 TALASILA Arush 1% 7% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
282 JIMENEZ Naveen 6% 31% 41% 19% 3% - -
283 RUBIN Max 5% 26% 42% 22% 4% - -
284 WOHLERS Trevor 1% 37% 44% 16% 2% - -
284 LAM Nicolas 5% 26% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
284 SMOLICH Marat 4% 27% 46% 19% 3% - -
287 GIDDENS James 2% 28% 44% 23% 4% - -
288 YU Stephen 19% 42% 29% 9% 1% - -
289 LI Ayren 5% 25% 40% 24% 6% - -
290 DUNLAP Ian 22% 44% 28% 6% - - -
291 TANG Alexander L. - 17% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
292 VANOYEN Dominick 20% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
292 LOCKWOOD Jacob 19% 44% 30% 7% 1% - -
292 ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan 8% 29% 37% 21% 4% - -
295 ZAPPALA Nikolai 45% 41% 13% 2% - - -
296 LINDEMANN Marc 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% - -
296 CLARK Benjamin 9% 37% 39% 14% 2% - -
298 MANDZY Theodor 3% 35% 40% 18% 3% - -
299 FLYNT Hayden 10% 37% 40% 12% 1% - -
300 GREENLEAF Paul 11% 38% 35% 14% 2% - -
300 GREENEBAUM Oliver 32% 43% 21% 4% - - -
302 BORG Matthew 12% 36% 35% 15% 3% - -
303 CHOI Ethan 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
304 HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott 18% 57% 22% 3% - - -
305 PRUT Anton 26% 50% 21% 3% - - -
306 NAZARIO Dominic 19% 47% 28% 5% - - -
307 KIM Jonah 10% 31% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
308 TSAO Lukas < 1% 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
309 LIU Ryan 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% - -
310 KLYCZEK Andrew < 1% 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% -
310 KAPOOR Aayan 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
312 JOHNSON Ryder 46% 41% 12% 1% - - -
313 PETERSON Lucas 30% 44% 21% 5% - - -
314 MILLER Jonathan 36% 44% 18% 2% - - -
315 SHANKS Aidan T. 3% 20% 39% 30% 8% 1% -
315 CANADY Isaac 41% 44% 14% 1% - - -
315 WEST Abraham 65% 32% 3% - - - -
315 HUNTER Phillip 58% 34% 7% 1% - - -
319 SHEHORN Connor 10% 34% 36% 17% 4% - -
319 BERSCHEID Arthur 31% 43% 21% 5% - - -
319 PHAN Henry 74% 23% 3% - - - -
319 LUI Justin 43% 41% 14% 2% - - -
323 KUO Jayden 70% 27% 3% - - - -
323 YORK Lucas 29% 45% 22% 4% - - -
325 YANG Ethan J. 25% 48% 23% 4% - -
326 MARTIN Dexter 88% 12% 1% - - - -
326 FRASER Rhys 36% 44% 17% 2% - - -
326 BASKIN Lukáš 23% 45% 27% 5% - - -
329 ZAIDI Adil 44% 43% 12% 1% - -
330 CHOI Benjamin 17% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
330 PECK Quinn 35% 43% 18% 3% - - -
330 WILLIS Tiernan 94% 6% - - - - -
330 ATKINSON JOSIAH 44% 43% 12% 1% - - -
334 MILES Greyson 57% 34% 8% 1% - - -
334 NAM Thomas 43% 41% 14% 2% - - -
334 MCARTHUR Kemp 57% 35% 7% 1% - - -
337 COLEMAN Marcus 84% 15% 1% - - - -
337 SHAMBARGER Graham 43% 44% 13% 1% - - -
337 SORRENTINO Salvatore 9% 33% 38% 17% 3% - -
337 ROTHMAN Matthew 41% 42% 14% 2% - - -
337 CHENG Mason 75% 23% 2% - - - -
342 CARROLL Robert 94% 6% - - - - -
342 THIYAGARAJAA Ari 43% 44% 12% 1% - - -
344 STAMMERS Milo 57% 35% 7% 1% - - -
344 KARAMAGA Ganza 34% 46% 17% 3% - - -
346 SCOTT Chase 67% 29% 4% - - - -
347 GORAYA abdullah 85% 14% 1% - - - -
348 ALLEN Augustus 97% 3% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.