Peoria Academy School - Peoria, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Marcus | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 2 | HICKEY Connor | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | NI Aaric | V D V V D V | V V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 3 | FRASER Rhys | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 5 | ZHOU Justin | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | WENGER Liam | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 7 | HONG Derek | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 8 | ZMUDA Aiden | V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | BALES Gabriel | V V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 10 | DEPP Edward | V V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 11 | TAN Charlie | D V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | LATORRE Leonardo | V V V D V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 13 | KAGAN Noah | D D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | V V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | SYMMANK Callen | D V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | TURNER Jackson | D V D D D D | V V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 17 | TWEMLOW Sacha | V V V V V V | D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 18 | YOUNG Jack | V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 19 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | V V V V D D | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 20 | XU Rambert | V D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 21 | WENGER Rowan | V V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 22 | MCMILLIAN Harrison | D D V V V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 23 | DAVIS Benjamin | D D V V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 24 | MURPHY Jonathan | D V D D V V | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 25 | CHASE Crosby | D D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | TAGORE Reyansh | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | GREULICH Nikolas | D D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | ZHENG Lerui | D V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 29 | CHEN Varick | V D V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 30 | HASTINGS Alex | V D D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 31 | DIFRANK Tae | D D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | BLACK John | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | NG Gavin | V D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 34 | LI Andy | D D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 35 | FRASER Alistair | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 36 | ZHANG Hanson | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 37 | CHAN William | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 38 | CRONK Trevor | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 39 | KOPELMAN Henry | D D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 0 | -3.2 |
| 40 | MCGRATH Milo | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 41 | TAGORE Ayansh | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.