The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

March NAC

Cadet Men's Foil

Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Oregon Convention Center - Portland, OR, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - - 1% 12% 88%
2 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
3 LIN Michael - - - - 8% 37% 55%
3 SIU Aiden - - - - 1% 17% 82%
5 CO Dylan - - - - 4% 28% 68%
6 LIN James G. - - - - 7% 40% 53%
7 QIAN Jason H. - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
8 LEE Brendan - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
9 COELHO Cristiano P. - - - - 1% 17% 81%
10 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - - 1% 14% 86%
11 RASMUSSEN Sage - - - 3% 18% 44% 35%
12 TRAUGOT Owen G. - - - - 3% 26% 70%
13 LI Bradley - 1% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
14 WU Alber Y. - - 1% 5% 23% 42% 29%
14 LIU Ethan - - - 4% 19% 43% 34%
16 MATSAKH Philip - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
17 DERRICK Blake - - 4% 22% 48% 26%
18 PONS Diego - - 3% 15% 36% 35% 10%
19 WONG Garrick G. - - - 4% 25% 49% 21%
20 MIN Eric - - - 6% 32% 61%
21 ZHANG Aaron - - 5% 19% 37% 31% 7%
21 KETTELLE John - - 4% 18% 39% 32% 7%
23 BUDOVSKYI Borys - - - 2% 16% 48% 34%
24 LI Toby - 1% 6% 22% 37% 28% 7%
25 SENIC Lucas - - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
26 LEE Eugene - 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 4%
27 TANG Owen S. - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
28 LIN Youlong - - - 1% 13% 44% 41%
29 RAUTUREAU Hugo - 5% 23% 40% 25% 6% -
30 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. - - 3% 15% 38% 36% 8%
31 TALASILA Arush - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16% 1%
32 CHEN Ethan - - 7% 29% 41% 21% 1%
33 GUERRA Gabriel H. - - - 1% 13% 49% 37%
33 DESHMUKH Arjun - - - - 3% 26% 70%
35 KIAYIAS Aris - - 9% 51% 39%
36 CANLAS Nathan - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
37 TANG Albert - - - 4% 21% 44% 31%
37 KIM Daniel Y. - 1% 6% 24% 40% 25% 5%
39 NICOLETTI Luca - - - 3% 24% 52% 21%
40 CHEN Matthew - 1% 9% 28% 39% 20% 3%
41 SAH Steven - 1% 13% 36% 36% 13% 1%
42 WEI Qiancheng (Matt) - - - 3% 17% 44% 36%
42 ZHANG Jacob - - 3% 18% 41% 31% 7%
44 XU Andy P. - 1% 6% 23% 39% 26% 5%
45 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden - 1% 6% 24% 41% 26% 2%
46 LU Kevin - 2% 11% 29% 37% 19% 2%
47 VADEN Oliver - - 5% 28% 45% 21% 2%
48 CHEN Kyle P. - - 1% 12% 35% 39% 12%
49 FENG Michael - - 5% 27% 43% 23% 2%
50 LO Preston - - 1% 11% 38% 40% 10%
50 LING Xiangqian(Daniel) - - 3% 17% 39% 32% 8%
52 WANG Brian - - 2% 12% 34% 39% 13%
53 LIU Zixian (Aaron) - - 2% 18% 44% 30% 5%
54 CORTRIGHT Skipper - - - 2% 15% 44% 40%
55 LU Nathan 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
56 DINSAY Kristjan - - - 4% 17% 40% 39%
57 SUAREZ Adrian - 1% 7% 24% 40% 25% 4%
57 SONG Noel - - 1% 9% 31% 42% 17%
59 LING Eddie - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 21%
60 PARRISH Evan - - 3% 18% 40% 31% 7%
61 MAO Lucas - 3% 19% 39% 30% 9% 1%
62 YANG Charles - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
63 XIE Buster - 10% 36% 39% 14% 1%
64 RODRIGUEZ Tyler 1% 17% 37% 31% 12% 2% -
65 SISINNI Riccardo - - - - 4% 27% 69%
66 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) - - 1% 7% 29% 45% 19%
67 LI Richard - 4% 25% 42% 23% 5% -
68 XU Ethan - - 5% 22% 41% 27% 5%
69 LEE Jonah - - - 2% 11% 39% 48%
70 TANG August L. - - - 3% 17% 44% 37%
71 PARK Steve (Sangmin) - - 7% 31% 41% 19% 2%
72 CHOI Ethan - 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
73 PARK Rion - - 2% 14% 41% 40% 4%
74 LIU Derek - - 1% 7% 27% 43% 21%
74 BLACK Zachary 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 1%
76 ALLEN Henry G. - - 4% 24% 42% 25% 4%
77 LIU William - 1% 7% 31% 41% 19% 2%
77 LI Matthew - - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
80 MORROW Brenden - 2% 16% 40% 36% 7%
81 WU Alistair - - 2% 12% 34% 39% 13%
82 CHEN Hanson - - 3% 17% 38% 33% 9%
83 HUANG Jonathan - 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 2%
84 BORKOWSKI Olgierd - 1% 6% 23% 39% 27% 4%
85 ROZALSKI Eli - 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4%
86 WONG Evan - 2% 17% 39% 31% 9% 1%
87 YAO Bradley - - 1% 12% 42% 40% 4%
88 SHENG Dalton - 1% 7% 23% 38% 26% 6%
89 LOZANO Veyron Jericho 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
90 CHENG Logan 4% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
91 TAN Aidan - 1% 6% 26% 41% 23% 3%
91 GHEDINI Luca - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 10%
91 CHUANG Oscar - 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
91 WU Trevor - - 2% 15% 41% 37% 6%
95 ZHOU Ryan - 1% 14% 42% 34% 9% -
96 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas - 1% 9% 30% 40% 18% 2%
97 CHEN Bolin Liam - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 23%
98 PINCHENG Yao - - 7% 38% 42% 11% 1%
99 CHANG Nathan - 13% 36% 35% 13% 2% -
100 PARKER Isaiah 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
101 ZHAO Adam - - 2% 14% 37% 36% 11%
102 WU Lucas - 1% 8% 31% 44% 15% 1%
103 CHAN Ian - - 9% 49% 43%
104 NGUYEN Martin - - 3% 17% 45% 35%
105 WANDJI Noah 4% 22% 40% 27% 6% -
106 ZHONG Maxwell 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 5% -
107 FUKUDA Diego - 1% 8% 23% 35% 25% 7%
108 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. 1% 9% 36% 37% 15% 2% -
109 LE Jacob H. - 1% 9% 30% 42% 17% 1%
110 MARTIN Darius 1% 6% 24% 39% 24% 6% -
111 GUO Justin - - 1% 5% 23% 44% 27%
112 HAYES Stewart 2% 14% 36% 35% 11% 1% -
113 GUTH Joseph - 2% 11% 29% 37% 19% 2%
113 PALMA Nathan Anthony - 1% 9% 31% 39% 18% 2%
115 CHANG Eric Jonathan 7% 24% 34% 24% 9% 2% -
116 CHENG Ethan - - 4% 24% 42% 26% 4%
117 SUN Ryan 1% 6% 26% 41% 22% 4% -
118 LEE Christopher T. - 1% 8% 23% 34% 26% 8%
118 SIMONOV Timofey - - 4% 21% 47% 26% 2%
120 PAN Ethan 2% 15% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
121 ELKOUSY Zain al Din 1% 8% 28% 38% 20% 4% -
122 ZHANG Matthew - 1% 11% 34% 38% 15% 1%
123 RAUTUREAU Arthur - 7% 28% 42% 20% 3% -
124 ZHENG Marcus 4% 24% 42% 24% 5% - -
125 TANG Alexander L. - 7% 32% 41% 18% 2%
126 ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan - 9% 63% 25% 2%
127 CHOI Ethan 3% 19% 39% 30% 8% 1%
128 LI Aaron - 1% 6% 22% 37% 28% 7%
129 TAN Junghyun - - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14%
130 RAJ Jay - - 5% 24% 44% 23% 3%
131 HARROCH Faustin - 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% -
132 CHO Xzander - 1% 14% 45% 32% 7% -
132 LING Carson Jr - 5% 29% 40% 22% 4% -
134 ONG Nicholas 1% 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
135 GERRISH William 3% 20% 36% 28% 10% 2% -
135 BAE Eugene - 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
137 UPENDER West 1% 22% 42% 27% 7% 1% -
138 YU Eric 8% 31% 38% 18% 4% - -
139 TWEMLOW Sacha - 4% 16% 32% 31% 14% 2%
139 CHANG Bernard - 2% 10% 29% 38% 18% 3%
141 CHANG Jonathan - - 6% 27% 42% 23% 2%
142 LU Mengdi 4% 19% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
143 ORNELAS Matteo 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 2% -
144 DOELL Ethan - - 7% 37% 43% 12% 1%
145 TSAY Jordan R. - 5% 30% 42% 19% 3% -
145 TOOMRE Kai 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1% -
147 SHANNON Jack 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
148 HUA Aaron 1% 12% 35% 37% 13% 1% -
149 FEDELI Francesco 2% 14% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
150 FANG Haoyu 6% 31% 40% 19% 3% - -
151 ZHANG Jayden 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
152 PE Noah 13% 39% 35% 12% 1% - -
153 HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador - 3% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
154 YU William 1% 11% 35% 36% 15% 3% -
154 LEE Mason 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
156 BAI Brian 1% 16% 36% 32% 13% 2% -
157 KUE Temujin - 5% 30% 42% 19% 3% -
157 HAN Alexander 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 2% -
159 KIM Harrison - 1% 6% 22% 39% 29% 4%
160 ZHANG Raphael 5% 29% 40% 21% 5% - -
160 CHONG Tristan 1% 10% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
162 DAI Christopher 4% 24% 43% 25% 5% - -
163 MAZAHERI Fletcher 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
164 GE Felix Fei 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
165 CHUN Dashel 3% 21% 41% 28% 7% 1% -
165 BI Ryan 1% 9% 30% 38% 18% 4% -
167 WANG Elijah (QiChen) 7% 34% 43% 14% 2% - -
168 SICAT Justin 4% 30% 41% 21% 4% - -
169 AGRAWAL Niki 10% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
169 WANG Li 1% 14% 37% 34% 12% 2% -
171 CHOI Benjamin 3% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1% -
171 BIELER Mason 2% 16% 38% 31% 10% 1% -
173 TURNER Finian 34% 50% 14% 2% - - -
174 CHANG Jeremy 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2% -
175 BORG Matthew 1% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3% -
176 MCKEE Calvin 18% 41% 31% 10% 1% - -
177 LI Samuel - - 2% 16% 38% 36% 8%
177 TEH Tang-Ngu 21% 47% 28% 4% - - -
179 KIM Jonah 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
180 FOY Grant 4% 27% 49% 18% 2% - -
181 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn 3% 17% 33% 30% 13% 3% -
182 CHOI Elliot 33% 53% 13% 1% - - -
183 BAI Austin 5% 27% 41% 23% 4% - -
184 MA Oliver 31% 52% 16% 2% - - -
184 YIN Zixin(Gavin) 37% 47% 15% 2% - - -
186 DHOKTE Neev - 7% 45% 37% 10% 1% -
187 MIRON Ioachim 19% 43% 30% 8% 1% - -
188 PARK William 5% 44% 38% 12% 1% -
189 ANWEILER Nathan 28% 44% 23% 5% - -
190 ZHANG GAVIN J 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% -
191 CHIANG Aiden 26% 65% 8% - -
192 SISINNI Leonardo 1% 10% 28% 34% 21% 6% 1%
193 MARTIRE Luca 13% 44% 34% 8% 1% - -
194 FUKUDA Brando 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
195 NEICE William 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 3% -
195 LYU Mingye 6% 28% 40% 21% 5% - -
197 WONG Jacob W. 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
197 CHA James 33% 46% 18% 3% - - -
199 UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan 1% 14% 47% 30% 7% 1% -
200 HE Bourne 43% 40% 14% 2% - - -
201 PETROV Mikhail 34% 45% 18% 3% - - -
201 LU Jingyi 2% 17% 36% 32% 12% 2% -
203 GOWDA Sumeru 28% 46% 21% 4% - - -
204 SHIN Noah 16% 37% 32% 13% 2% - -
205 PARK David 12% 41% 35% 11% 1% - -
205 LI Edison M. 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1% -
207 HOU Gaven 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
207 HOLCOMB Alexander 30% 44% 21% 5% - - -
209 YUE Jackson 2% 18% 39% 30% 9% 1% -
210 TAM Kyle 1% 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
210 XU Nathan 7% 30% 38% 20% 5% 1% -
212 YU Kinton 2% 19% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
213 LIANG Ethan 36% 44% 17% 3% - - -
214 ZHANG Lucas 4% 24% 40% 25% 6% 1% -
215 ONIK Ari N. 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
216 DIAZ Gabriel 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
217 XIE Yimo 15% 43% 35% 6% - - -
218 QIAN Zekai 19% 42% 29% 9% 1% - -
218 FRASER Rhys 20% 40% 29% 10% 2% - -
220 ZHANG Andrew 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
221 SUN Neo 40% 53% 7% - - - -
222 GAO Andrew 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
223 LEE Christopher 22% 59% 17% 2% - - -
224 BLACK Henry 25% 51% 22% 2% - - -
225 HE Ian 26% 42% 24% 7% 1% - -
225 KRZYWON Dylan 45% 42% 12% 1% - - -
227 REID Wesley 70% 26% 3% - - - -
228 LAM Kirin 44% 44% 11% 1% - - -
229 YANG Arthur 14% 43% 33% 9% 1% - -
230 MANIKTALA Suvir 46% 41% 12% 1% - - -
230 PLUMMER Waylon 6% 28% 41% 21% 4% - -
232 SHAW Spencer 45% 40% 14% 2% - - -
232 KIM Seoheul 30% 47% 21% 2% - - -
234 CHANG Joseph 61% 32% 6% 1% - - -
234 CAO Sean 47% 47% 6% - - - -
236 BHANOT Arjun 67% 32% 1% - -
237 SUNDSTROM Wren 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
237 YANG Tate 23% 46% 25% 6% 1% - -
239 SCHUMANN Benjamin 47% 45% 7% - - - -
239 BANUELOS Dario 87% 13% 1% - - - -
241 TRUJILLO Jonah 81% 18% 1% - - -
242 WEI Winston 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
242 COLLIGAN Apollo 74% 23% 3% - - - -
242 WANG Albert 47% 45% 8% - - - -
245 ZMUDA Aiden 28% 45% 22% 4% - - -
245 GUO Joey 45% 41% 13% 2% - - -
245 OLLILA Gideon 48% 41% 10% 1% - - -
248 PUNG Corbin 61% 35% 4% - - - -
249 LUZIER Ben 86% 13% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.