Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | NING Emma | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | LUONG Shirley | D D D V V | V V V V D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 3 | SCALA Emma | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 5 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
| 7 | TYLER Syd | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 8 | MEHROTRA Anya | D D D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 9 | FALINSKA Julia | V V D V V V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 10 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 11 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 12 | SZPAK Lara K. | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | V V D D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | RUSSELL Renata | D D D D D | V V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 17 | MYLER AnneMarie | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 18 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 19 | WANG anne | V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | AHUJA Arianna | D V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | D V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 23 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 24 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | V D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 25 | SEMIKIN Julia | V D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 26 | WALLACE Katherine C. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | GUPTA Ananya B. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | D V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 29 | KIM Natalie S. | V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 30 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | D V D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 31 | BECKER Carson E. | D V D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 32 | BOTNER Olivia | D D D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 33 | WEISS Rachel | V D V D V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 34 | LOMBARD Ella | V D V V V D | D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 35 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | D V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 | |
| 36 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | V V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 37 | ROBERTSON Lily | V D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 38 | BERDICHEVSKY Adelle M. | D V V D D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 | |
| 39 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 40 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | D D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 41 | KIM Erika S. | D D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 42 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | V D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 43 | SCHULTZ Gillian | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 44 | BURN Lauren M. | D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 45 | WU Fan | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 46 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 47 | DRAYTON Hannah | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 48 | HONG Elaine | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 49 | BOLES Savvianna | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 50 | OH Kaitlin Y. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 51 | SAMANDAS Jackelyn | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 52 | WU Meiye (Mia) | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.