Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Eva | V D V V D | V V V V V V | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 2 | SEIDL Cassidy M. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | MING YUE | D V V D V D | V V V V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 3 | GE Yu Ming | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 5 | GREEN Marisa | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 6 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | V D V V V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 7 | SAKALLA Serene | V V D V D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | HUANG Sophie | V V D D V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 9 | CHENG Isa | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | LI Katerina | V D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 11 | TURNER Stephanie E. | V D V V V D | V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 12 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | SIMONOV Dasha | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 14 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | V V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | DIPAOLO Julia | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | LIU Caydence | D D V D V D | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | WANG Chloe | V V V V V D | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | MEYER Claudia | V D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | WEI Angela | V V D V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 20 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | V V V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 21 | KIM Claire | V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | FENG Audrey | V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | BASILE Gianna | V V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 24 | LAZAR Carolina | D V V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 25 | OLSEN Jen | V D V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 26 | CHARALEL Jessica | V V V D D V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 27 | WANG Yudi | D D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 28 | HWANG Chanel | D V V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 29 | LENZ Zoe N. | D V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 30 | FONG Ellis | D D V D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 31 | ANAR Yesugen | V D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 32 | LAO Sophia | D V D D D D | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 33 | CHEN Colyi | D V V D V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 34 | SHAH Suhani | V D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 35 | WANG Melissa | D D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 36 | LI Xiang (Shining) | V V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 37 | CHEN Sophie | D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 38 | SNYDERS Evelyn | D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 39 | COMO Gabriella | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 40 | TSE Isabel | V D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 41 | LEE Allison | D D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 42 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 43 | LIU Long | D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 44 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 45 | WU Kristen | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 46 | WANG Annie | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 47 | DALBERG Meadow | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 48 | CHOI ERIN | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 49 | ANAR Yesui | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 50 | WANG Yilin | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 51 | NETTLETON Ava | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 52 | FANG Adela | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 53 | PARK-YOO Shia | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.