The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Premier Challenge ROC(D1A, DV2, VET), RJCC & PARA

Junior Men's Saber

Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 4:00 PM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SHIRPAL Oleksandr V V D D D V V V V V V V V 5.0 3 -2.0
2 HUANG Alex F. D V V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
3 CHEONG Heonjun V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
3 DEPEW Spencer V D V V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
5 LIM Brandon V V V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
6 NG Jonathan V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
7 WANG ANDREW CHANG V V V D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
8 BYON Adrian V D D V V V V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
9 GLOZMAN Justin V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
10 TSAO Oliver V V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
11 TENG MATTHEW V V V D V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
12 WANG Will D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
13 LAUB William D V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
14 WANG Jerry V D V D V V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
15 MCDONALD Finn D V D V V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
16 HUANG Alexander C. V V V D D D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
17 GINSBERG Jordan V V V D V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
18 LEE Andrew D V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
19 FREDRICK Jameer V V V V V D V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
20 GONG Jerry V V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
21 NGO Maximus V V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
22 FIELDS Matthew S. V V D V V D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
23 EYBELMAN Ariel V D V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
24 LIU Kevin V V D V V D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
25 CHEN Jonathan D V V V D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
26 POSY Daniel D V V V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
27 CLARK Aram V D D V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
28 RYAN Kai V V V D D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
29 ZEWDA Kebron V V V D D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
30 MCCARTHY Devan V D V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
31 CUSUMANO Neal V V V V D D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
32 ALAVE Kyle V V D V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
33 ZHAO Lucas V V V V V D D 4.6 5 +0.4
34 BYON Julian V V V V V D D 4.9 5 +0.1
35 WEN Edward V V V V V D V D 4.3 5 +0.7
36 LEE Anderson V V V V D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
37 LIN Steve V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
38 KO Zuriel D V V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
39 ZHEXUAN yu V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
40 BODKIN Jake M. D V V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
41 PIWOWAR Alex D V D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
42 RIDKY Sam D V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
43 SCHIMEL Luke V V D V D V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
44 PRIEUR Christian F. V D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
45 SIMMONS John M. V D D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
46 VEDRE Neil D V V D V V V D 1.7 4 +2.3
47 HE Bowen D V V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
48 GONG zihao V V D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
49 FELDMAN Drew V V D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
50 DIMATTEO Michael D V D V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
51 HOPPA Luke H. D D V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
52 WANG Michael V D D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
53 BOULAIS Andrew D. D V D V V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
54 LIGH Checed D D V V V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
55 AO Christopher D V D V V D V D 3.0 3 -
56 MEHAN Nicholas D V D V V D V D 4.6 3 -1.6
57 ONG Chinli D V D V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
58 LI Maxwell V V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
59 SUBA Lucas D V D V D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
60 BADUSHOV Anton D V D V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
61 JONES Elijah D D V V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
62 FADEL Alexander D D D V D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
63 MATTINGLY Ian D D V D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
64 OH Aster V D D D D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
65 KALOUDIS Sean V V D D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
66 MANESCU Miron D V V V V D D 3.1 4 +0.9
67 BERGER Jacob D D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
68 HERR Gabriele V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
69 BARROWS Hunter D V V V D D 1.4 3 +1.6
70 LIEUWMA Nicolas V D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
71 HO Jacob V D V V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
72 MARGULIS Jared V V D D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
73 SUN Andrew V D V D V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
74 LIU Isaak V V D D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
75 O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan V V V D D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
76 LIN Philip T. D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
77 CHAKRAVORTY Sohan D D V V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
78 QUAIL Jonathan D D V V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
79 BHATIA Ekam D V D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
80 CLARK Gabriel D D D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
81 HENDERSON Lucas D D D V V D D 3.3 2 -1.3
82 SUGIURA Samuel V D D D D V D 3.8 2 -1.8
83 WANG Max D D V D V D D 3.9 2 -1.9
84 LUAN Mark D D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
85 SASSI Ilyas V D D V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
86 IVRON Yonatan D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 WANG Yifan D V D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
88 CHENG Hong D D V D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
89 TSAO Alister V D V D D D D 2.0 2 -
90 SAKAYEDA Jacob V V D D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
91 CUNLIFFE Sebastian V D D D D V D 0.8 2 +1.2
92 WEISS Toby V D D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
93 RINDISBACHER Peter D D V D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
94 ARPAD Mehmet D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
95 PORTER Dupree D D D V D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
96 PAVLENISHVILI Luke D D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
97 JIANG Terence D D D V D D D 1.0 1 -
97 RAMIREZ Nicholas D D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
99 JIN David D D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
100 GINGERY Julian D D D V D D D 1.0 1 -
101 JACQUES Hugo D D D D V D D 0.6 1 +0.4
102 SHELMIDINE Cole D D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
102 MAMKIN Nathan V D D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
104 CHEN Ryan D V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
105 WOLMART Zander D D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
106 BANSAL Krishiv D D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
107 WASCO Andrew D D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
108 ARPAD Ahmet D V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
109 MA ziteng D D D D V D D 0.3 1 +0.7
110 KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
111 ROSADO Sebastian D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
112 JANUS Maksymilian D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
113 YANG Byron D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
114 JAIN Karan D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
115 ANTICO Lorenzo Sebastian D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
115 VARKI Simon D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.