University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 6.0 | 6 | - |
| 2 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 3 | ZHONG Maxwell | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 5 | GORDON William L. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | SISINNI Leonardo | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | PARK Andrew | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 8 | TSAY Jordan R. | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 9 | FUKUDA Brando | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | UPENDER West | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | LEHTINEN Axel | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | AGARWAL Savya | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 13 | CHAN Joseph | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 14 | ZHANG Jason | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 15 | WEI Winston | V D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 17 | HE Ian | V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 18 | YANG Tate | V D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | ANDRADE Cedric | V D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | HE Bourne | D V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | SONG Peipei Yiheng | V V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 22 | LIANG Ethan | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | TRUJILLO Jonah | D D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 24 | HUANG Nathan | D V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 25 | LUK Trusten | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | LEE Christopher | D D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | YEE Colin | D D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 28 | GUO Joey | D D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | DULAI Agam | D V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 31 | WILLIAMS Matthew | D V D D D D | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 32 | CHETWANI naman | D D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 33 | CHEN Owen | V V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 34 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | D V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 35 | SAFTA Aidan | V D V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 36 | MARTIN Lucas | V V D D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 37 | GANAPATHI Eshan | V V D V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 38 | KIM Andrew | V D V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 39 | FEDOR Lucian | D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 40 | HE Gary | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 41 | BANUELOS Dario | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 42 | DULAI Angad | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 43 | LI Austin | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 44 | DOUGLASS Liam | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 45 | LEONG Wilson Hua | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 46 | AHN Theodore | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | CHEUNG Henry | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | LO Ernest | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 49 | CRIDLAND Trent | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 50 | CHENG Maxwell | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 51 | ARCARA Evan | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 52 | KO Ian | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 53 | KONG Enoch | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 54 | KO Cameron | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.