University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Joy | - | - | - | - | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 2 | LUO Miranda | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 3 | CHAN Mila | - | - | 1% | 16% | 46% | 37% | |
| 3 | LIU Ariana | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 5 | PENG Charlotte | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 6 | THERON Zoe | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 7 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 7% |
| 8 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 9 | LEE Zoe | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% |
| 10 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
| 11 | HSIAO Ariya | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 2% |
| 12 | HOM Avery | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 7% |
| 13 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% |
| 14 | KIM Erin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 15 | CHAN Ella | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 18% | 3% | |
| 16 | DING Madison | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | |
| 17 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 33% | 7% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
| 19 | MA Isabelle | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 20 | LIU Isabelle | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | HSU Emily | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% | |
| 22 | YU Sophie | - | - | 4% | 26% | 48% | 23% | |
| 23 | CHO Karis | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 2% |
| 24 | HOFFMAN Isabelle | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 25 | OTAEGI Elorri | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | TAN Shouyin | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 27 | ARYA Leela | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | TAI Taphanie | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | LI Sophia | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 31% | 5% |
| 30 | AHN Hayley | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Queeny | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MANANSALA Zara | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | YU-TAN Claire | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | TANG Amelia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 35 | HO Chloe | 12% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | BHANGOO Paloma | 46% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | DVOIRIS Maya | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | LEE Abigail | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 39 | KULKARNI myra | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SARANGAN Ovia | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | STERNAD Pia | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | HOFFMAN Amelia | 24% | 50% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | HSU Rachel | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 44 | LIM Stella | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | WANG Ellen | 19% | 44% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | PARK Seojeong | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | YU Xintong | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | HUGHES Bailey | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 49 | ZHAN Catherine | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | YANG Byanca | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | JOESUF Aurielle | 3% | 24% | 51% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | ARAKELYAN Marina | < 1% | 13% | 43% | 37% | 6% | - | - |
| 53 | MARCHIEL Ava | < 1% | 20% | 43% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.