The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Morris Cup RYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Épée

Sunday, April 7, 2024 at 12:30 PM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BOUDREAUX James - - - 2% 19% 63% 16%
2 MIDYANY Evan - - 1% 11% 38% 38% 11%
3 AHMED Mohsen - 1% 8% 29% 42% 21%
3 TRAN Spencer - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
5 BAJAJ Nakul - 3% 21% 41% 30% 5%
6 YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki - 1% 11% 32% 39% 16%
7 DUKO Phillip - 1% 7% 24% 42% 26%
8 KIM Henry - - 1% 5% 21% 41% 32%
9 SOLARZ Arthur - 1% 5% 20% 38% 30% 7%
10 MILINKOVIC Maksim 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 4%
11 LIU Ethan - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6% -
12 TU Jinqi - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 23%
13 LONG Kevin - 6% 25% 38% 25% 6%
14 O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar - 2% 12% 32% 38% 15%
15 ZENG Andrew - - 1% 7% 29% 48% 15%
16 HELMY Richard - 7% 29% 38% 21% 4%
17 GAO Victor - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
18 BRADSHAW Carter - - 2% 13% 42% 43%
19 ORESKOVIC Olivier - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
20 DOUBOV Andrew - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
21 OPERT Emmett - - - 1% 9% 36% 55%
22 GREENFIELD Caleb - 1% 8% 28% 42% 20%
23 BHARGAVA Siddharth - 1% 7% 25% 41% 25%
24 ALEXANDER Christopher - 1% 10% 32% 42% 15%
25 PARIGIAN Alexander - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
26 DEGRUCCIO Johnny 1% 9% 31% 38% 18% 3%
27 LI Morgan 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
28 MOZZER Nolan 7% 28% 38% 22% 5% -
29 LEVESQUE Gabriel 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% -
30 PAN Anthony 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8%
31 CRESPO Nathaniel Justus 1% 11% 31% 35% 18% 4% -
32 NG Nico 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3% -
33 KIM Zac - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 2%
34 KRUPENKO Gael - 1% 5% 20% 37% 29% 7%
35 LY Samuel - - 1% 5% 23% 44% 27%
36 LI Ray 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
37 CAO Gavin 2% 12% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
38 BHANDARE Veer 6% 30% 38% 20% 5% 1% -
39 LI Jade - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
40 DURKIN Hudson - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
41 ARMSTRONG Payson - 12% 35% 37% 15% 1%
42 WITHERELL Logan 3% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
43 DANILOV Artur - 10% 31% 36% 19% 4%
44 CHEN Daniel - 2% 13% 31% 35% 16% 2%
45 CHANG Ian 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2% -
46 LEE Henry 1% 9% 27% 34% 22% 6% 1%
47 HE Yurui 2% 14% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
47 ROBINSON Garrett 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 2% -
49 DYCKMAN Benjamin 1% 10% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
50 ROSIELLO Francesco 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
51 AGUIRRE Pablo 1% 11% 30% 35% 19% 4% -
52 NOOL Alexander 1% 8% 25% 34% 23% 8% 1%
53 LAVIN Ethan - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
54 CHEN Edward 4% 21% 38% 29% 8% 1%
55 GUMEDELLI Mohnish 1% 7% 26% 39% 24% 4%
56 LUR'YE Killian 9% 38% 36% 14% 3% -
57 SHAPIRO Samuel 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
58 MIDYANY Ryan - 5% 23% 40% 27% 6%
59 YU David 6% 38% 38% 15% 3% -
60 LUO Alexander - 3% 17% 34% 31% 12% 2%
61 CUELLAR Markus 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -
62 RADZIKOWSKI Sam - 7% 27% 39% 22% 4%
63 WANG-SONG Evan 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
64 WANG Marcus 8% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
65 FRIZZELL Kai 1% 12% 31% 34% 17% 4% -
66 OCONNOR Paul 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
67 HANNA Alexander 17% 43% 29% 9% 1% - -
68 ZHANG Jonathan - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
69 HONG Ethen 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
70 CHO Adrian 17% 40% 31% 10% 1% -
71 KIM Louie 76% 22% 2% - - -
72 WU Matthew 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
73 FENG Xinmin 30% 42% 22% 5% 1% -
74 CHUNG Jesse 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
75 LEE Kalvin 32% 42% 20% 4% - -
76 TSIEN Richard 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
77 FOGEL Jake 9% 32% 37% 18% 3% - -
78 LEE Harrison - 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2%
78 POWELL Horatio 9% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
80 LEE Ryan 46% 39% 13% 2% - - -
81 PREVOST Landon 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
82 TURLIK Midas 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% -
82 MCGANN Grant 57% 35% 7% 1% - -
84 NABI Mikhail 68% 28% 4% - - -
85 AU Joshua < 1% 6% 28% 40% 21% 4%
86 GRANT Aidan 20% 41% 29% 8% 1% -
87 MALLAKIS Efstathios 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
87 SHI Evan 44% 40% 13% 2% - - -
87 ROBINSON Blake 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
90 BRESLAV Asher 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
91 MAZEL Antonin 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.