Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AWAD Royce | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 2 | LI Sonia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 3 | FOSS Persephone | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 3 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 5 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 5 | SHMULER Fiona | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% |
| 7 | BAIK Sarah | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 8 | KIM Audrey | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
| 9 | BROWN Aria | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 10 | GONG Joy | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 11 | VINOKUR Anita | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 12 | KWON Ava | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
| 13 | FUNG Iris | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 14 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 15 | PARK Haylie | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 20 | LEE Grace | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 21 | VATS Ishita | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | KWON Ava | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 5% |
| 23 | NARAYANAN Sinduja | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 24 | MYAT Chloe | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 25 | MACKAY Katherine | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 26 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 28 | LIANG Claire | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 30 | WANG MONA | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | MAK Jayden | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | |
| 32 | HO Sophia | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | NEMORIN Rei | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 34 | RIFKIN Lielle | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | HARRISON Allie | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | MERZLYAKOVA Maria | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 37 | BANDHU Saahiti | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | KIM Grace | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 38 | JONES Nima | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 6% |
| 40 | LEIGH Adalene | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | CAFAGNA Sofia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 42 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 43 | NEGROIU Mara | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | SHI Chuqing | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | KAKAR Sahana | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | HUANG Pierra | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | CHEN Victoria | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 49 | FONG Abigail | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | ZONG Eliane | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | HAGN Luna | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LIU Teresa | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | JOHN Sophia | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 54 | ZHAO Selena | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 55 | REDA Sophie | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 56 | MOTOVA Masha | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | BARNES Sarah | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MULLER Inara | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 59 | PITRUN Viktorie | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | CHANG Elle | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 61 | MERZLYAKOVA Alexandra | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | WANG Chloe | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | BUCCINO Sloane | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | BORDUCCI Madeleine | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | SMITH Genevieve | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | ELLIS Saffa | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LIAO Amber | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 68 | DEMRY Kylee | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | LEE Janice | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 68 | YIN Xizi | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 71 | GALLANT Justine | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 72 | WANG Yixin | 2% | 36% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 74 | YOUNG Sienna | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | DIBADJ Ava | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.