Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | V V V D V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | FEDELI Francesco | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KIM Gene | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | SHIN Noah | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | DOELL Ethan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 6 | GE Felix Fei | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | LIM EUNSEONG | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 8 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | D V V V D D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | PAN Ethan | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | XU Nathan | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | SLAIN Owen | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 12 | FANG Haoyu | V V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | HUYNH Matthew | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | ZHAO Nathan | V V V D V D | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 15 | QIAN Zekai | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 16 | LATORRE Leonardo | D D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 18 | CHANG Parker | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | LIU Alex | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | PARK Andrew | D V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 21 | SIU Max | D D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | JIN Xueyuan George | V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | ZENG Albert | V V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 24 | ZHAI Derrick | D D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 25 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | V V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | V V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | CHIANG Aiden | V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | BAIER Leon | D V V D D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 29 | HUANG Dalynn | V D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | QIAN Henry | D D V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 31 | DANTON Ryan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 32 | LI Jayden | D D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 33 | KIM Andrew | V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 34 | MAZAHERI John | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 35 | HOFFMAN Zane | V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 36 | HOARE Gabriel | D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 37 | LEE Aeden | D V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 38 | SUSANTO William | V V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 39 | DIFRANK Avery | D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 40 | NEMI Vin | D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 41 | JORGE Elijah | D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 42 | KOVACH Graham | D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 43 | MAZAHERI Theodore | V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 44 | LI Andrew | D D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 45 | SCHWARTZ David | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | LIU Runze | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 47 | SIEBENALER Trevon | D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 48 | GRIGORYAN Erik | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 49 | REBNER Parker | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 50 | KUTATELADZE Danieli | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 51 | LIANG Andrew | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 52 | ROBERTSON Liam | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 53 | MORRISON Archer | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 54 | CHUNG Royce | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 54 | PATEL Aarav | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 54 | PHILIPP John | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 57 | CHIU Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 58 | HU Anthony | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.