Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WONG Garrick G. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | PARRISH Evan | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | ZHAO Adam | V V V V D D | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | RAJ Jay | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 5 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | SHENG Dalton | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 7 | FEDELI Francesco | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 8 | MAO Lucas | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 9 | YOON Junhyeok | V V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 10 | VADEN Oliver | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | MARISI Gabriel | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 12 | BOESKIN Nolan | V V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 13 | PAN Ethan | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | LIM EUNSEONG | V D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 15 | YANG Ethan J. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | PAZ Luis | D D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | DOELL Ethan | V D V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | DHOKTE Neev | D D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 19 | XU Nathan | V V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | CAO Kellen | V V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 21 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | D V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | LEE Junehyuk | D D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 23 | GE Felix Fei | D V D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 24 | SHAW Spencer | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | BRIDGES Harrison | D V D D D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 26 | BRIDGES Henry | V D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 27 | YOU Chanmin | D V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 28 | MILLER Jonah | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 29 | CHIANG Aiden | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 30 | SU Daniel | V D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | BARRERA Marcelo | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | MORTON Luke | D D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 33 | SIGGINS Wally | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 34 | HU Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 35 | MARTIN Jayden | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.