Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BROWN Lola | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | PARK Lina | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 3 | DENG Melissa | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | WONG Angellena | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 5 | SHMUKLER Maria | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 6 | MARISI Gianna | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 7 | LIU Samantha | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 8 | PARK Zena | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 10 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | CHERNYKH Elina | V D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | ALKADI Mai | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 13 | PINEDA jade luna | D V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | LI Olivia | D D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | WU Chingfei Amber | V D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | CHOI JULIE | D V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | KATS Ekaterina | V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 17 | LEE Jeemin | V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | WATSON Evelyn | D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 20 | SINGH Evangelina | D D V V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | V V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | WANG Dina C. | V D D V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 24 | BAULIN Zoya | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 25 | CHU Felicity | D D V V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 26 | HU Sophie | D D V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | WANG Sophia | D D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 28 | GE Lena Lan | D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 29 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | D D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | LIU Elinda | V D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 31 | KUTATELADZE Anna | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 32 | OWEN Alexandra | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | HAFEZ Sahar | V D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 35 | HALLER Naomi | D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 36 | DUVVA Sanika | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | YOTHER Anna | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 38 | KIM Alison | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 39 | SCHWARTZ Sophie | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.