Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
| 2 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
| 3 | JING Emily | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 5 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 6 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 30% | |
| 7 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 8 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 9 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 11 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 12 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 45% | 29% |
| 13 | SHEN Lydia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 14 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 7% |
| 15 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
| 16 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% | |
| 17 | XU Christine | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 34% | 6% | |
| 18 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
| 19 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% | |
| 20 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | ORVANANOS Anice | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 22 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | LIU Sophia | 4% | 42% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | LI Rachel Y. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | HUANG Natalie | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | WU Celine | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 3% | |
| 29 | SENIC Adeline | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 30 | XU Madison | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 31 | XUE Alanna | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 32 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | YE Eileen | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
| 34 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 35 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | EYER Hailey M. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 4% | 35% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | LI Meilin | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 39 | GU EMILY | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 40 | FU Qihan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 41 | HUNT Abigail S. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | SU Michelle | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% | |
| 44 | YU Lauren C. | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 1% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 8% | - | |
| 50 | RASO Olivia | 2% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | KOKES Gwendolen | 13% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | TOBIN Brean | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | BASSON Bayley D. | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 54 | LEE Lavender | - | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 55 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SEPULVEDA Paris N. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 57 | DAVIES Ellie | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 59 | ZHOU Olivia | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | LIN Victoria T. | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | BHAN Zala | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | WANG Yudi | 10% | 50% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | ZHU Elise | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 64 | LEE Carina | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | ROHRING Anna L. | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.