The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Division 1/Parafencing National Championships + April NAC

Vet-50 Men's Épée

Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 9:30 AM

Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Birth Year

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

#	Name	Number of victories
#	Name	0	1	2	3	4	5	6
1	WHEELER Daniel	-	1%	7%	25%	38%	24%	5%
2	CRANOR Erich L.	-	2%	9%	24%	34%	24%	7%
3	HITCHCOCK David	-	1%	6%	23%	38%	27%	6%
3	GAINES Aaron	-	-	5%	20%	42%	33%
5	O'LOUGHLIN Chris S.	-	-	-	-	1%	27%	72%
6	HABIB Farooq	-	-	-	3%	21%	59%	17%
7	LEE Tobias (Toby) T.	-	2%	10%	26%	34%	22%	5%
8	SNIDER Jeffrey H.	1%	8%	28%	38%	21%	5%	-
9	BARREIRO Darren	-	1%	10%	32%	40%	16%
10	STEWART Robert	4%	21%	36%	28%	10%	1%
11	ROBERTS Peter	-	5%	38%	42%	14%	1%	-
12	LICHTEN Keith H.	-	-	-	2%	13%	41%	44%
13	BAILEY Creston P.	1%	14%	37%	34%	12%	1%
14	HARGROVE Charles	2%	12%	31%	35%	18%	3%
15	DEUCHER Joseph H.	-	-	5%	24%	44%	26%
16	PENGELLY Neil	1%	9%	31%	38%	18%	3%	-
17	MAYCHROWITZ Matt	-	3%	17%	36%	31%	12%	1%
18	KAUFMAN Joel H.	-	6%	26%	40%	23%	4%
19	PRIHODKO Andrew	-	6%	24%	38%	26%	6%	-
20	HUNTER Justin	3%	16%	34%	32%	13%	2%
21	YAKIMENKO Andrei	3%	17%	35%	31%	12%	2%
22	SUPONYA Sergey	-	2%	12%	32%	37%	16%
23	SPRINGER Michael	2%	12%	31%	35%	17%	3%
24	MEHALL Michael	-	-	-	4%	19%	42%	34%
25	LE DEVEHAT Yannick	1%	7%	21%	33%	27%	11%	2%
26	GREENBAUM Isaac	1%	9%	28%	37%	21%	4%
27	SPEICHER Eric V.	14%	34%	33%	16%	4%	-	-
28	HILLSTROM Nathan	30%	42%	22%	6%	1%	-
29	KRYLTSOV Greg	8%	38%	37%	14%	2%	-
30	HELGE James R.	-	1%	19%	45%	31%	4%	-
31	WILSON Jeffrey M.	-	1%	6%	19%	34%	30%	10%
32	GAO "George" Xiaojiang	52%	38%	9%	1%	-	-	-
33	GERSEN Jacob	1%	14%	35%	33%	14%	3%	-
34	CLAWSON Brian C.	3%	17%	32%	30%	14%	3%	-
35	EXUM Travis H.	-	-	1%	8%	29%	46%	16%
36	NEMAZIE David A.	-	1%	17%	44%	33%	5%	-
37	OKURA Ethan R.	5%	29%	39%	22%	6%	1%	-
38	GREGORY Dean	10%	29%	34%	20%	6%	1%	-
39	EDWARDS Tim	9%	32%	36%	18%	4%	-
40	KERTESZ Stefan G.	27%	42%	24%	6%	1%	-
41	GATES Darcy C.	-	3%	16%	34%	34%	13%
42	KUO Michael	63%	31%	5%	-	-	-	-
43	JEFFCOAT Timothy	10%	68%	20%	2%	-	-	-
44	ROGERS John D.	85%	14%	-	-	-	-	-
45	MCNAMARA Scott	11%	41%	35%	12%	2%	-	-
46	LOGUE Paul	59%	34%	7%	1%	-	-

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

Each cell in a fencer's row corresponds to a specific number of victories, starting from the left with no victories and increasing to the right, indicating victories in all bouts.
The shading of each cell represents the probability of that particular victory outcome for the fencer. Darker shades indicate higher probabilities, suggesting that the outcome is more likely based on past performances. On the other hand, lighter shades point towards less probable outcomes.
The boxed number in a cell represents the actual number of victories the fencer achieved in the pool, making it easy to compare predicted probabilities with actual outcomes at a glance.
By examining the gradient from lighter to darker cells, you can get an intuitive sense of where a fencer's victories are more or less expected based on their historical performance.

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.

Want to keep up with all things fencingtracker? Join our Discord community here.