The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

The Durkan Spring Div 2 ROC

Div II Men's Foil

Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 8:00 AM

South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HEISE Dominic V. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.8 6 +0.2
2 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 ZHANG Henry C. D V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
3 DESANDO Michael R. V D V V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
5 LAURICELLA Douglas V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
6 BICKFORD Michael S. V V D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
7 ZELTSER Lawrence M. V D V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
8 SANTULLI Tristan D D D D V D V V V D 2.4 1 -1.4
9 MAGIDSON Gabriel V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
10 TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. V V V V V D V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
11 PYO Michael M. V V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
12 MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. V V V D V V V V D 2.3 5 +2.7
13 IVARSSON Oliver V V V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
14 ORTIZ Zachary M. D V D V V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
15 ENGEL Henry R. D V V D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
16 ALDRICH Peter D V D D D V V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
17 BRYANT Max V D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
18 MACRAE Harrison A. V D D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
19 KWON Ethan V D V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
20 YEE Charles E. V V V V D D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
21 CUTOLO Connor V V V D D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
22 PUGLISI Will D V V V D V D 3.0 3 -
23 REZNICK Nicholas J. D D V D V V V D 4.8 3 -1.8
24 MATHEWS Rocco J. V D V V D D V D 4.4 3 -1.4
25 WASDEN Andrew B. V D V D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
26 LEE Maxwel W. V D D V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
27 CAI Oliver K. D D V V V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
27 WANG Gerald Y. D V V D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
29 BRODERICK Padraig D V V D D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
30 DAUM Charlie V D V V D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
31 STURGIS Zachary C. D D D V V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
32 PRIETO Julian D D D D V V D 1.5 1 -0.5
33 NAGER Noah V V V V V D D 4.8 5 +0.2
34 MEYERS Lee P. V V V V D D 2.9 4 +1.1
35 KLEIN Sebastian W. V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
36 FURST Matthew C. V V V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
37 ESTEVES Dionel L. D V V V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
38 OZSOLAK Alex V D V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
39 ORR Aidan V V D V V D D 4.0 4 -
40 HORSLEY Alexander V D D V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
40 ZHAO Jesse V V V D D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
42 HEALY Tyler D V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
43 SOLIMAN Paul S. V D D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
44 WASDEN Alexander D V V D V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
45 STRAYER Andrew D D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
46 BELLUOMO David C. V V D V D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
47 DESOLA Aidan J. V D D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
47 SCHICKER Glenn V V D V D D D 4.4 3 -1.4
49 DYCKMAN Andrew P. V V D D D D 1.3 2 +0.7
50 TANG Anthony D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
51 BROWN Alexander R. D V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
52 SCHOFIELD Benjamin J. D D V D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
53 BAMSEY Connor G. D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
54 KIZHNER Fillip D D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
55 MAGIDSON Josh D V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
56 VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. D V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
57 WERWA Griffith D V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
58 VLACK Felix D D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
59 ARANA Massimo V D D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
60 SPILBERG Michael D D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
61 CALMAN Max N. D D D D D D V D 0.6 0 -0.6
62 FRITZ Ayden R. D D D D D V D 2.8 0 -2.8
64 PICARD Justin D D D D D D V D 1.1 0 -1.1
65 POLEN William I. D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
66 GOLISANO Tyler A. D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
66 CHEUNG Kevin D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
68 TROG Matthew D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.