Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | JING Emily | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 58% |
| 3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 3 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
| 5 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% |
| 6 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
| 7 | HAYES Nadia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 8 | KIM Rachel | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 9 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 52% |
| 10 | YANG Iris | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 12 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 4% |
| 13 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 14 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 1% | 13% | 51% | 34% | |
| 15 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% | |
| 16 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 47% | 44% | |
| 17 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 19% |
| 18 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 19 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 20 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 10% |
| 21 | LIN Zhi Tong | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | SHEN Emilia | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% | |
| 24 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 25 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 10% |
| 26 | FENG Grace | - | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | YANG Emma | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 28 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 29 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 34% | 6% |
| 30 | SHA Yi Ling | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | YANG Audrey | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 32 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 4% |
| 33 | DENG Melissa | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 35 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% |
| 35 | FUNG Vera | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 38 | OH Ceana | 4% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | WANDJI Anais | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 40 | COOPER Piper W. | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 7% |
| 42 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 43 | CALISE Ella | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 44 | LI Eleanor | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 46 | MI Aileen | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 47 | FUNG Emma | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 49 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 50 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 51 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 52 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 54 | SHIM Grace J. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 56 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 57 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
| 58 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
| 59 | WANG SIQI | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | STRUGAR Steliana | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 61 | PEVZNER Nicole | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 62 | HSU Kaylin | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | SHMAY Anastasia | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | XIE Su | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | LIU Samantha | 59% | 35% | 6% | < 1% | - | - | |
| 66 | ZHOU Catherine | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 67 | SWANSON Alexa | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 68 | SUN Chloe | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
| 69 | YU Jane | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | TAYLOR Gabby | 26% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 71 | KO Claire | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | LUO Sandra J. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 73 | FENG Audrey | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 74 | LIU Eva | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 75 | ORVANANOS Anice | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 76 | CASTANEDA Keira | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 77 | LAI Sophia | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 78 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 9% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | LEE Allison | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 80 | MEI Sarah | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 81 | CANNON Lira J. | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 81 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 83 | CHANG Elizabeth | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | MU Allison | 2% | 14% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 85 | ZHANG Selena | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 86 | BEAVER Hannah | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 87 | PAULUS Isabella | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | GREEN Marisa | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | QUINN Anna | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 91 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 92 | SAIFEE Lamya | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 93 | VO Bao-Vy | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | SUN Emily | 1% | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 95 | RAO Sonia D. | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 96 | PANT Anisha | - | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 97 | KIM Sydney | 38% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 98 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 99 | CHOI Kailyn | 10% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 100 | SEAL Cameron I. | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | ROY Layla | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 102 | WHELAN Amelia | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 103 | WANG Xiaolan | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | GUO Audrey | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 105 | WANG CAROL | 5% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 106 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 106 | KIM Claire | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 106 | KRAATZ Kira | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 109 | FERGUSON Aliya | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 109 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 38% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 109 | FELICIANO Claudia | 25% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 112 | ZHANG Vicky | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.