The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Division 1/Parafencing National Championships + April NAC

Veteran Men's Épée

Friday, April 26, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 MACZIK Adam W. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.1 6 +0.9
2 CHENG Thomas V V D V V V V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
3 SNIDER Jeffrey H. V V D D V V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
3 HITCHCOCK David V D V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
5 GAINES Aaron V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
6 DEUCHER Joseph H. V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
7 SUPONYA Sergey D V V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
8 LIOU Solomon D V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
9 MEHALL Michael V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
10 ZUCKER Noah L. V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
11 CHANDLER Paul F. D V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
12 YAKIMENKO Andrei V D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
13 PHO Eric V V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
14 STEPHAN Jens D V V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
15 PRIHODKO Andrew V V D V D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
16 CRANOR Erich L. V V V D D D V V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
17 O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. V V V V V V V D 5.9 6 +0.1
18 HABIB Farooq V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
19 TAYLOR Daryl J. V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
20 LEE Tobias (Toby) T. D V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
21 HELGE James R. V V V D V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
21 LOEFFLER Carl E. V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
23 CLAWSON Brian C. V V D V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
24 SCHINDLER Sergey M. D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
25 HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. V V V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
26 SUVEG Bela D V V D V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
27 HARGROVE Charles V V V V D D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
28 GREENBAUM Isaac V V V D V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
29 BARREIRO Darren V V D D D V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
30 STEWART Robert D V D D D V V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
31 SWANSON Dave D D V V D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
32 LIN Kimball D D V D D V V D 2.1 1 -1.1
33 SPRINGER Michael V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
34 STOCK Jordan V V V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
35 PENGELLY Neil V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
36 MAYCHROWITZ Matt V V V V V D D 4.1 5 +0.9
37 LYTLE Evan V V V D V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
38 WHEELER Daniel V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
39 JOHNSON Jeff D V V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
40 CARTER Austin L. D V V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
41 DEPOMMIER Remi V D V V V D V D 4.0 4 -
42 LE DEVEHAT Yannick D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
43 EDWARDS Tim V V V D D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
44 JUGAN Bruce M. D V V V D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
45 KAUFMAN Joel H. D D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
46 GATES Darcy C. V V D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
47 VARNEY John R. V D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
48 KERTESZ Stefan G. D D V V V V D 1.5 3 +1.5
49 HUGHES Michael D. V V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
50 FANGMAN Daniel L. V D V D V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
51 ROBERTS Peter V V D V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
52 OKURA Ethan R. V D V V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
53 RESS Michael A. V V D V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
54 LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. V D D D V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
55 MCNALLY Thomas J. V D D V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
56 HUNTER Justin V V D D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
57 SHULL Marc D D V V D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
58 MARSH Timothy G. D V D D D V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
59 GREGORY Dean D D D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
60 GLASS Timothy C. D D D V V D V D 4.3 2 -2.3
61 JEFFCOAT Timothy D V D D V D V D 0.8 2 +1.2
62 GERSEN Jacob D V D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
63 SLOAN Ryan D D D D V V D 0.8 1 +0.2
64 PIERRO Roger D V D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
65 ROUSE Joe T. V D V V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
66 LIPTON Michael D. V D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
67 KRYLTSOV Greg V V D V D D 1.3 3 +1.7
68 KING Richard (Dick) M. V D D V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
69 GAO "George" Xiaojiang D D V D V V D 0.7 3 +2.3
70 MORET Eric N. V V V D D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
71 KIM Jeff V D D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
72 CAFASSO martin D V D D V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
73 FRANK Fred V D V D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
74 FLINT James E. D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
75 SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. D V D V D D 3.3 2 -1.3
76 MASE James B. D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
77 BECK Brian C. V D D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
78 JENSEN David D D D V D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
79 HVIDING Ketil D D D V V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
80 SPEICHER Eric V. D D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
81 FRANGER Jeff D D D V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
82 SWANN William A. D D V D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
83 KASKAN Peter E. D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
83 KRUGER Mark D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
85 HILLSTROM Nathan D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
86 LEONARDINI Barry M. D V D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
87 NEWSOME James L. D D D D V D 3.0 1 -2.0
88 SCOTT George R. V D D D D D D 3.4 1 -2.4
89 MCTIGUE J. Michael V D D D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
90 LOGUE Paul D D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
91 WHITELOCK James R. D V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
92 SCHWARY Irv D D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
93 BLAKLEY Dwain D D V D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
94 ELLINGTON Jeff B. D D D V D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
95 KUO Michael V D D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
96 LANDIS Geoffrey A. D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
97 STAFURIK John (Jack) W. D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
98 CARTER Tony D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
98 POWELL Troy D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
100 BARANOWSKI Philip D D D D D D D 2.7 0 -2.7
101 NEALE James H. D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
102 TOMASI John D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
103 SILKEY Jason D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
103 REED David D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
105 ROGERS John D. D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
106 GALLIVAN James D D D D D D D 0.0 0 -

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.